headers
Peter Bittner | 1 Jul 2009 07:33
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Fw: Re: OpenDocument status

Hi Christian,

2009/6/30 Christian Weiske <cweiske <at> cweiske.de>:
> Hi Peter,
>
> From the lack of response I begin to wonder if you are subscribed to
> pear-dev anymore?

I don't know. I have not received any feedback, neither directly or
through the mailing list. I have not received any mailing from the
list either, though, at all since June 9.

If anyone would just suggest how I should proceed with the changes I
have made to the code so far, I'd know what to do for the moment.

Let me know what you think about this,
Peter
Cheers, Peter

--

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 501 comments |
headers
Christian Weiske | 1 Jul 2009 09:57
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Fw: Re: OpenDocument status

Hi Peter,

> > From the lack of response I begin to wonder if you are subscribed to
> > pear-dev anymore?
> I don't know. I have not received any feedback, neither directly or
> through the mailing list. I have not received any mailing from the
> list either, though, at all since June 9.
> 
> If anyone would just suggest how I should proceed with the changes I
> have made to the code so far, I'd know what to do for the moment.
I made some greater changes now to OpenDocument - adding support for multiple document types api-wise (no
other doc types than text are implemented yet), and wrote a completely new storage system that allows us to
open and save zipped (e.g. odt) or opendocument XML files (one big xml as said in the specs). I also moved the
element classes into OpenDocument/Element/.

This are heavy changes, and your patches will probably not be applyable anymore - sorry for that.
Could you post your patches somewhere and describe, which parts you made better?

-- 
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske

--

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson | 1 Jul 2009 10:38
Picon

Re: php 5.3 on windows does not work with go-pear.phar

Damn hyperactive send button, as to what we can do till then, tell people to
use go-pear e.g. not the phar. We still provide that afaik.

I will give this some thought, am about to step on a plane in 10 mins to
head to Dublin and Cork so I might be held up on further discussions till
Saturday but I will do my best to stay in touch.

- Helgi

On Jul 1, 2009 9:07 AM, "Christian Weiske" <christian.weiske <at> netresearch.de>
wrote:

Hi,

Several users reported that the windows package of php 5.3 does not work
with the phar:
- http://pastebin.com/d79a424b3
- http://pastebin.com/d49c8cc02

phar "C:\Users\Sebastian Bergmann\php\PEAR\go-pear.phar" does not have a
signature
Warning: require_once(phar://go-pear.phar/index.php): failed to open stream:
phar error: invalid url or non-existent phar "phar://go-pear.phar/index.php"
in C:\
Users\Sebastian Bergmann\php\PEAR\go-pear.phar on line 1236

What can we do?

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson | 1 Jul 2009 10:38
Picon

Re: php 5.3 on windows does not work with go-pear.phar

Hi,

Ask tias to fix it since he is the main dev on go-pear :) maybe greg can
chime in as to what is happening with phar in 5.3 - it might be an
accidental openssl siganture verification being triggered and I know our
phars haven't been made to use that, yet (mainly due to php_archive not
supporting that I am sure and the openssl improvements are mostly/all 5.3
only)

- Helgi

On Jul 1, 2009 9:07 AM, "Christian Weiske" <christian.weiske <at> netresearch.de>
wrote:

Hi,

Several users reported that the windows package of php 5.3 does not work
with the phar:
- http://pastebin.com/d79a424b3
- http://pastebin.com/d49c8cc02

phar "C:\Users\Sebastian Bergmann\php\PEAR\go-pear.phar" does not have a
signature
Warning: require_once(phar://go-pear.phar/index.php): failed to open stream:
phar error: invalid url or non-existent phar "phar://go-pear.phar/index.php"
in C:\
Users\Sebastian Bergmann\php\PEAR\go-pear.phar on line 1236

What can we do?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Alexey Borzov | 1 Jul 2009 12:00
Picon
Favicon

Re: [PEAR-BUG][Reminder] Reminder about open bugs in HTML_Common

Hi,

There is something fishy with the bug reminders, this bug I'm reminded about was 
closed almost 3 months ago.

PEAR QA wrote:
>  PEAR Bug Database summary for HTML_Common - http://pear.php.net/bugs
> 
>   ID  Status     Summary
> 
> 15787 Open      _parseAttributes with strings trimmed blank of attribute
> values. 
> 
>   Further comments can be seen at http://pear.php.net/bugs/15787
>   Edit this bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=15787&edit=1

--

-- 
PEAR QA Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
till | 1 Jul 2009 13:50
Picon

Fwd: [PEAR-BUG][Reminder] Reminder about open bugs in Mail_Queue

Can anyone briefly explain -- all these are "closed"? They were also
closed yesterday, so way before the email was assembled.

Till

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: PEAR QA <pear-qa <at> lists.php.net>
Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Subject: [PEAR-BUG][Reminder] Reminder about open bugs in Mail_Queue
To: Lorenzo Alberton <l.alberton <at> quipo.it>
Cc: Till Klampaeckel <till <at> php.net>

 PEAR Bug Database summary for Mail_Queue - http://pear.php.net/bugs

 ID  Status     Summary

14921 Assigned  Delay in sendMailsInQueue().

 Further comments can be seen at http://pear.php.net/bugs/14921
 Edit this bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=14921&edit=1

15049 Open      Count emails in queue.

 Further comments can be seen at http://pear.php.net/bugs/15049
 Edit this bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=15049&edit=1

15303 Feedback  Unserialize throws error.

 Further comments can be seen at http://pear.php.net/bugs/15303
 Edit this bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=15303&edit=1
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
till | 1 Jul 2009 13:51
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR-BUG][Reminder] Reminder about open bugs in HTML_Common

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Craig Constantine<cconstantine <at> php.net> wrote:
> Subject: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR-BUG][Reminder] Reminder about open bugs in
> HTML_Common
> From: Alexey Borzov <borz_off <at> cs.msu.su>
> To: PEAR QA <pear-qa <at> lists.php.net>, PEAR Announce <pear-dev <at> lists.php.net>
> Date: Wed Jul  1 06:00:19 2009
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is something fishy with the bug reminders, this bug I'm reminded
>> about was closed almost 3 months ago.
>
> me too...
>
> I'm received reminders for packages that I'm no longer a lead nor even an
> active dev. Yes, I checked that the bugs are also not actually assigned to
> me.
>

Oops, ok. Sorry for the double-post. Same here, basically.

Till

--

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
till | 1 Jul 2009 13:53
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Re: php 5.3 on windows does not work with go-pear.phar

2009/7/1 Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson <dufuz <at> php.net>:
> Hi,
>
> Ask tias to fix it since he is the main dev on go-pear :) maybe greg can
> chime in as to what is happening with phar in 5.3 - it might be an
> accidental openssl siganture verification being triggered and I know our
> phars haven't been made to use that, yet (mainly due to php_archive not
> supporting that I am sure and the openssl improvements are mostly/all 5.3
> only)
>
> - Helgi

If I remember correctly, the patch to fix this didn't make it in
5.3.0, but will be in 5.3.1.

Till
>
> On Jul 1, 2009 9:07 AM, "Christian Weiske" <christian.weiske <at> netresearch.de>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Several users reported that the windows package of php 5.3 does not work
> with the phar:
> - http://pastebin.com/d79a424b3
> - http://pastebin.com/d49c8cc02
>
> phar "C:\Users\Sebastian Bergmann\php\PEAR\go-pear.phar" does not have a
> signature
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
till | 1 Jul 2009 14:03
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Re: [STANDARDS] revision to the standard that would make me happy

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Christian Weiske<cweiske <at> cweiske.de> wrote:
> Greg,
>
>
>> >> So we don't lose any of the rigor, and gain flexibility.  Does this
>> >> modified sales pitch change your mind? :)
>> >
>> > I believe above stands as my answer.  I'm happy to be swayed by a
>> > majority of non-PEAR developers showing me how I'm wrong, though.
>>
>> ...and this is why regrettably I must say I can't support either the
>> standard or its advocate, Travis, for re-election to PEAR Group.
>> Someone making decisions for PEAR should be advocating *for* PEAR, not
>> against it.
> indeed.

Err, guys?!

Let's not overreact and turn this into a game of politics. PEAR is not
an island. Yeah, hard to believe but PEAR co-exists with many, many
other projects. The download figures we got are nice, but e.g. I bet
phpclasses exceeds them by far. ;-) Aside from whatever the standard
looks like, Travis is trying to come up with something that would be
also adopted outside of PEAR. This does not mean that he is *against*
something.

Big picture.

Till
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Daniel O'Connor | 1 Jul 2009 14:29
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Re: php 5.3 on windows does not work with go-pear.phar

2009/7/1 till <klimpong <at> gmail.com>

> 2009/7/1 Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson <dufuz <at> php.net>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ask tias to fix it since he is the main dev on go-pear :) maybe greg can
> > chime in as to what is happening with phar in 5.3 - it might be an
> > accidental openssl siganture verification being triggered and I know our
> > phars haven't been made to use that, yet (mainly due to php_archive not
> > supporting that I am sure and the openssl improvements are mostly/all 5.3
> > only)
> >
> > - Helgi
>
> If I remember correctly, the patch to fix this didn't make it in
> 5.3.0, but will be in 5.3.1.
>

*cough* Pear blog, anyone?
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane