headers
Troy Cregger | 1 Mar 2007 16:01

Re: [PEAR] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Structures_LinkedList-0.1.3 (alpha) Released.


Nice! I've missed C data structures (and STL) since I started working
with PHP.

Quetion... This package isn't compatible with PHP4 is it?

Thanks.

PEAR Announce wrote:
> The new PEAR package Structures_LinkedList-0.1.3 (alpha) has been released at http://pear.php.net/.
> 
> Release notes
> -------------
> * Correct some syntax warnings thanks to Christophe Gesche's codechecker
> 
> Package Info
> ------------
> A singly-linked list offers the ability to insert or delete
>  nodes at any point within the list. A doubly-linked list also offers the
>  ability to request previous nodes in the list.
> 
> Related Links
> -------------
> Package home: http://pear.php.net/package/Structures_LinkedList
>    Changelog: http://pear.php.net/package/Structures_LinkedList/download/0.1.3
>     Download: http://download.pear.php.net/package/Structures_LinkedList-0.1.3.tgz
> 
> Authors
> -------
> Dan Scott <denials <at> gmail.com> (lead)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Igor Feghali | 1 Mar 2007 16:08
Picon

Re: GSoC 2007 ideas

Hi Christoph !

So the proposal would be porting SQLAlchemy to PEAR or develop our own package ?
Note that GSoC lasts 3 months so I have to propose something
reasonable that can be done in that period of time.

Regards,
Igor.

On 2/16/07, Christoph Schiessl <c.schiessl <at> gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Great news! I think the package we need most is a sophisticated
> solution for data persistence. The best persistence package I know is
> SQLAlchemy (www.sqlalchemy.org), written in Python. Read through the
> tutorial... it's amazingly easy to use and still powerful and
> flexible enough for almost any problem you might want to solve.
>
> Best Regards,
> Christoph Schiessl
>
> On Feb 16, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Igor Feghali wrote:
>
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > GSoC 2007 is already announced
> > (http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2007/02/speaking-of-
> > summer.html),
> > but not accepting applications yet. I will apply again this year and
> > because of the great experience I had last year with you (that still
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Bertrand Mansion | 1 Mar 2007 16:33

Re: GSoC 2007 ideas


Le 1 mars 07 à 16:08, Igor Feghali a écrit :

> Hi Christoph !
>
> So the proposal would be porting SQLAlchemy to PEAR or develop our  
> own package ?
> Note that GSoC lasts 3 months so I have to propose something
> reasonable that can be done in that period of time.

I have a "data persistence" package ready to be proposed anytime soon  
in PEAR. It is not as robust and full featured as SQL Alchemy but I  
think it can be easily hold the comparison against other solutions  
like Propel, Zend_DB, etc.
It's fast and very easy to use. It only has drivers for Sqlite and  
MySQL at the moment (I don't have access to other databases) but  
writing a driver is very easy. It relies on many PHP5 only features.

--

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
David Coallier | 1 Mar 2007 16:35
Picon

Re: GSoC 2007 ideas

I would probably want to see something along those lines:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/daophp5/

And I don't want anyone to say anything about DB_DO, I know about it,
and I do not want something that builds queries. I want a real good
DAO for pear. Something reliable, simple, fast, working.

$0.02

On 3/1/07, Igor Feghali <igor.feghali <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Christoph !
>
> So the proposal would be porting SQLAlchemy to PEAR or develop our own package ?
> Note that GSoC lasts 3 months so I have to propose something
> reasonable that can be done in that period of time.
>
> Regards,
> Igor.
>
> On 2/16/07, Christoph Schiessl <c.schiessl <at> gmx.net> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Great news! I think the package we need most is a sophisticated
> > solution for data persistence. The best persistence package I know is
> > SQLAlchemy (www.sqlalchemy.org), written in Python. Read through the
> > tutorial... it's amazingly easy to use and still powerful and
> > flexible enough for almost any problem you might want to solve.
> >
> > Best Regards,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Bertrand Mansion | 1 Mar 2007 16:40

Net_URL_Mapper or Net_URL_Router (was:Re: [PEAR-DEV] [PEPr] Proposal finished Networking::Net_URL_Mapper)


Le 25 févr. 07 à 10:00, PEPr a écrit :

>
> PEPr has automatically finished the proposal on  
> Networking::Net_URL_Mapper.
>
> Sum of Votes: 6 (2 conditional)
> Result:       This proposal was accepted
>
> Further details on the status of the proposal and the votes can be  
> found here:
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=428

Hi,

Obviously this package didn't drive a lot of interest although I  
believe it is a very useful addition to any programmer's toolset.  
Anyway, I consider not enough people voted for it to be added to  
PEAR. It's probably my mistake since documentation is a bit scarce at  
the moment.

If I look at the conditional votes, 2 people ask me to rename it  
Net_URL_Router. So I guess that's only 4 votes in the end, then this  
package is not accepted. I don't want to rename it Router actually,  
this package doesn't route your request, unlike Zend stuff or RoR  
routes, it just maps your pathinfo to a defined set of rules and  
returns a result. It works a bit like Console_GetArgs, you define  
rules and the pathinfo is the argument that will be parsed.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 10 comments |
headers
Arnaud Limbourg | 1 Mar 2007 16:47

Re: Net_URL_Mapper or Net_URL_Router

Bertrand Mansion wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Obviously this package didn't drive a lot of interest although I believe 
> it is a very useful addition to any programmer's toolset. Anyway, I 
> consider not enough people voted for it to be added to PEAR. It's 
> probably my mistake since documentation is a bit scarce at the moment.
> 
> If I look at the conditional votes, 2 people ask me to rename it 
> Net_URL_Router. So I guess that's only 4 votes in the end, then this 
> package is not accepted. I don't want to rename it Router actually, this 
> package doesn't route your request, unlike Zend stuff or RoR routes, it 
> just maps your pathinfo to a defined set of rules and returns a result. 
> It works a bit like Console_GetArgs, you define rules and the pathinfo 
> is the argument that will be parsed.

The name is fine and describes what the package does. I think there 
might be a lack of visibility of proposals currently put to voting, they 
lack visibility. Maybe they should be shown somewhere on the main page 
of pearweb ?

> So, is it possible to mark it as rejected or to extend the vote period ?

I'm not sure PePr allows that. The easiest could be to do another proposal ?

> Thanks in advance,

Arnaud.

--

--
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Arnaud Limbourg | 1 Mar 2007 16:50

Re: GSoC 2007 ideas

Bertrand Mansion wrote:
> 
> Le 1 mars 07 à 16:08, Igor Feghali a écrit :
> 
>> Hi Christoph !
>>
>> So the proposal would be porting SQLAlchemy to PEAR or develop our own 
>> package ?
>> Note that GSoC lasts 3 months so I have to propose something
>> reasonable that can be done in that period of time.
> 
> I have a "data persistence" package ready to be proposed anytime soon in 
> PEAR. It is not as robust and full featured as SQL Alchemy but I think 
> it can be easily hold the comparison against other solutions like 
> Propel, Zend_DB, etc.
> It's fast and very easy to use. It only has drivers for Sqlite and MySQL 
> at the moment (I don't have access to other databases) but writing a 
> driver is very easy. It relies on many PHP5 only features.

Sounds interesting !

Arnaud.

--

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Lukas Kahwe Smith | 1 Mar 2007 16:58

Re: GSoC 2007 ideas

David Coallier wrote:
> I would probably want to see something along those lines:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/daophp5/
> 
> And I don't want anyone to say anything about DB_DO, I know about it,
> and I do not want something that builds queries. I want a real good
> DAO for pear. Something reliable, simple, fast, working.

Speaking of which:
http://svn.phpontrax.com/browser/trunk/trax/vendor/trax/active_record.php

That was posted to my blog a few days ago.

regards,
Lukas

--

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Mark Wiesemann | 1 Mar 2007 18:19
Picon

GSoC 2007 / Structures_DataGrid

Hi,

I'd like to propose an idea for the Google Summer of Code 2007. 

Structures_DataGrid already offers some nice features, but is currently
limited to displaying data. An editing feature for the package would be
a nice (and often requested) addition.

This new feature would require the following tasks:
- make all DataSource drivers able to write data back (e.g. with MDB2
into a database table)
- make all DataSource drivers able to filter data (e.g. a record
identified by a primary key)
- make the core Structures_DataGrid able to work with GET/POST data that
comes (e.g.) from a form
- make one or more new renderers that allows editing (starting with a
HTML renderer that uses HTML_QuickForm [and maybe other PEAR packages],
maybe followed by XUL)

This is a first and quick list of ideas of it. Comments about the items
and the general usefulness for GSoC 2007 are welcome.

To avoid confusion: This is not a really 'open' proposal. Olivier
Guilyardi and I are planning such an editing feature for quite some time
now. And we think that GSoC would be a good opportunity and motivation
for finally working on it. Therefore, the plan is that Olivier would be
the mentor and that I would be the student.

It would also be nice to get some advice about the next steps. For
example: Who would submit the proposal? (Of course, we will provide a
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dan Scott | 1 Mar 2007 19:07
Picon

Re: Re: [PEAR] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Structures_LinkedList-0.1.3 (alpha) Released.

Thanks!

To answer your question, no; this package is very much dependent on
PHP5. Sorry :(

Dan

On 01/03/07, Troy Cregger <tcregger <at> kennedyinfo.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Nice! I've missed C data structures (and STL) since I started working
> with PHP.
>
> Quetion... This package isn't compatible with PHP4 is it?
>
> Thanks.
>
> PEAR Announce wrote:
> > The new PEAR package Structures_LinkedList-0.1.3 (alpha) has been released at http://pear.php.net/.
> >
> > Release notes
> > -------------
> > * Correct some syntax warnings thanks to Christophe Gesche's codechecker
> >
> > Package Info
> > ------------
> > A singly-linked list offers the ability to insert or delete
> >  nodes at any point within the list. A doubly-linked list also offers the
> >  ability to request previous nodes in the list.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane