yoram bar haim | 1 Feb 2012 09:13
Favicon

[PHP-DEV] Re: One more critical problem in 5.4

Just to make everything clear, I'm not sure if it was my mistake change 5_4 
branch, but currently 5_4 branch (after 322964 commit) solves the header 
problem.
Thanks for the work.

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
>
>> Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
>
> I committed a possible fix to trunk.  It's pretty much along
> the patch from you, I just hat to fix crashes in the cli server
> and need to do some more testing before merging into PHP_5_4.
>
> Thank you for your reports!
> Mike

--

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Lior Kaplan | 1 Feb 2012 10:57
Favicon

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: One more critical problem in 5.4

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
> 
> I committed a possible fix to trunk.  It's pretty much along
> the patch from you, I just hat to fix crashes in the cli server
> and need to do some more testing before merging into PHP_5_4.

Hi Mike,

According to my testing revision 322931 and 322964 fix the issue on the
5.4 branch. I also tested that display_startup_errors=1 doesn't make
apache to crash (as this was the original report).

Thanks for the fixes (:

Kaplan

--

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

jpauli | 1 Feb 2012 11:03
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: One more critical problem in 5.4

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Lior Kaplan <lior.k <at> zend.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
> >
> > I committed a possible fix to trunk.  It's pretty much along
> > the patch from you, I just hat to fix crashes in the cli server
> > and need to do some more testing before merging into PHP_5_4.
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> According to my testing revision 322931 and 322964 fix the issue on the
> 5.4 branch. I also tested that display_startup_errors=1 doesn't make
> apache to crash (as this was the original report).
>
> Thanks for the fixes (:
>
> Kaplan
>
>
Seems like the last blocking bug for RC7 has been fixed :)
Stas : planning an RC7 release ?

Thx all for your great work ^^

Julien

>
(Continue reading)

Michael Wallner | 1 Feb 2012 11:31
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: One more critical problem in 5.4

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:57:08 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 03:58 -0500, Michael Wallner wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0200, yoram bar haim wrote:
>> 
>> > Sorry, problem is not solved yet.
>> 
>> I committed a possible fix to trunk.  It's pretty much along the patch
>> from you, I just hat to fix crashes in the cli server and need to do
>> some more testing before merging into PHP_5_4.
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> According to my testing revision 322931 and 322964 fix the issue on the
> 5.4 branch. I also tested that display_startup_errors=1 doesn't make
> apache to crash (as this was the original report).
> 
> Thanks for the fixes (:

Thank you all for your reports and sorry to Stats & David that the output
layer caused another unplanned RC.

Regards,
Mike

--

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

(Continue reading)

Stephen A. Zarkos | 1 Feb 2012 19:06
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

[PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: szarkos

Working with Pierre Joye on the build hosts (for Windows), automated testing and test infrastructure for PHP/Windows.

--

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Andi Gutmans | 1 Feb 2012 19:08
Favicon

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks

Hi,

As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory usage (enabling higher concurrency) and
runtime performance.
We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: what you're seeing with your
real-world apps.

If you have any experiences to share please do. Benchmarking is not easy and can be misleading (config not
being the same, compiler options, different version of byte code caches, etc..) so the more data points we
get the better the info re: performance gains.

Thanks,
Andi
Pierre Joye | 1 Feb 2012 19:18
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks

hi Andi,

We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can
be seen here for example here:

http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20120119-5.3.9-5.4.0RC6.html

for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location.

We are going to do add some more perf related tests later.

Cheers,

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi <at> zend.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory usage (enabling higher concurrency) and
runtime performance.
> We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: what you're seeing with your
real-world apps.
>
> If you have any experiences to share please do. Benchmarking is not easy and can be misleading (config not
being the same, compiler options, different version of byte code caches, etc..) so the more data points we
get the better the info re: performance gains.
>
> Thanks,
> Andi

--

-- 
Pierre
(Continue reading)

Andi Gutmans | 1 Feb 2012 19:24
Favicon

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks

Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too.

Thanks!!
Andi

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php <at> gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM
>To: Andi Gutmans
>Cc: internals <at> lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
>
>hi Andi,
>
>We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can be seen
>here for example here:
>
>http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20120119-
>5.3.9-5.4.0RC6.html
>
>for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location.
>
>We are going to do add some more perf related tests later.
>
>Cheers,
>
>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi <at> zend.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory
(Continue reading)

Pierre Joye | 1 Feb 2012 19:37
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks

hi!

I could add zend optimizer to the stack but we do not have a license
(or is it free for the optimizer only?).

APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We
will run compat tests first.

About the memory usage, yes, this is on my todos. I have a tool for
that (on win) which has less than 1% impact on perf so we can compare
all in one run. But that will have to wait post final.

Cheers,

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi <at> zend.com> wrote:
> Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too.
>
> Thanks!!
> Andi
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php <at> gmail.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM
>>To: Andi Gutmans
>>Cc: internals <at> lists.php.net
>>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
>>
>>hi Andi,
>>
>>We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can be seen
(Continue reading)

Andi Gutmans | 1 Feb 2012 19:42
Favicon

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks

Optimizer+ is free and packaged in Zend Server Community Edition. Happy to get you and anyone else who wants
to run benchmarks a copy out of cycle. We haven't put a preview up yet but have it working.

Re: memory usage, I've seen some great results so definitely will be nice to see what others are seeing.

Thanks,
Andi

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php <at> gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:37 AM
>To: Andi Gutmans
>Cc: internals <at> lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
>
>hi!
>
>I could add zend optimizer to the stack but we do not have a license (or is it
>free for the optimizer only?).
>
>APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We will run
>compat tests first.
>
>About the memory usage, yes, this is on my todos. I have a tool for that (on
>win) which has less than 1% impact on perf so we can compare all in one run.
>But that will have to wait post final.
>
>Cheers,
>
>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi <at> zend.com> wrote:
(Continue reading)


Gmane