vdrift unvollständig ... noarch/vdrift-data-tracks-20090615-0.pm.2.1.noarch.rpm ??

Hallo!

In den Packman-Paketen fehlen die "tracks"-Daten für VDRIFT .

Ich habe folgende Pakete von ftp://packman.iu-bremen.de/suse/11.2/ verwendet

x86_64/vdrift-20090615-0.pm.1.6.x86_64.rpm

noarch/vdrift-data-20090615-0.pm.2.1.noarch.rpm
noarch/vdrift-data-cars-20090615-0.pm.2.1.noarch.rpm
noarch/vdrift-data-drivers-20090615-0.pm.2.1.noarch.rpm
noarch/vdrift-data-sounds-20090615-0.pm.2.1.noarch.rpm

Es fehlt das Verzeichnis "tracks" mit
Ziel: /usr/share/games/vdrift/data/tracks

Ich habe mir die Quellen von http://vdrift.net/ heruntergeladen und das 
Verzeichnis tracks von dort verwendet

--

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Fred Koegler

Re: vdrift unvollständig ... noarch/vdrift-data-tracks-20090615-0.pm.2.1.noarch.rpm ??

Am Montag, 1. Februar 2010 schrieb Fred Koegler:
> Hallo!
>
> In den Packman-Paketen fehlen die "tracks"-Daten für VDRIFT .
nein die fehlen nicht , sie sind nur verschüttet gegangen durch unseren neuen 
Build-Server :(

Der lädt oft Pakte nur teilweise auf den packman server hoch.....

--

-- 
have fun
Toni

Re: Globulation2

On 01/31/2010 11:36 PM, Bor Švab wrote:
[...]
> for sending this email, it's the download link for the 1-click-install
> openSUSE package of Globulation2 found on this page:
> 
> http://globulation2.org/wiki/Download_and_Install

Fixed the link. And building 0.9.4.4 (including for 11.2) as we speak.

cheers
--

-- 
  -o) Pascal Bleser     http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
  /\\ <pascal.bleser <at> skynet.be>       <guru <at> unixtech.be>
 _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.

Wiki online again

Hello all,

due to a silly mistake the database has been offline for some time
without being noticed.

Its up and running again.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

-Marc
--

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|              --> http://www.links2linux.de <--                   |
|                                                                  |
+---Registered-Linux-User-#136487------------http://counter.li.org +

[PM] XBMC 9.11-1.pm.1.6 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)

Hi,

I thought there _must_ be something wrong with your packages.

Multiple people on forums (both openSUSE and XBMC) report, that packaged by 
you XBMC crashes and vanilla one doesn't.

Just take a look at fresh one here: 
http://xbmc.org/forum/showthread.php?p=501161

I was getting the same log and debug backtrace since I have upgraded to 
openSUSE 11.2.

[Here I wanted to scream, until I resolved the bug, while was writing this e-
mail.]

Multiple times I shared this link and will do this again and again, until 
somebody gets interested: http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/8187

Isn't it a shame, that openSUSE is in XBMC's FAQ one of the proud distros, 
which provides packages, but article author notes, that RPMs didn't work for 
him?

http://xbmc.org/wiki/?title=HOW_TO_install_XBMC_on_openSUSE_Linux

I have even provided the patches and %configure flags to XBMC, so they could 
check for bugs, but they ignored them, as they don't have to support each 
custom patched build.

http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/8187#comment:8

datenschutz

Guten Tag!
ich habe ein Paket vorgeschlagen - dies per email. jetzt finde ich
mich doch tatsächlich mit meiner privaten Emailadresse im Netz wieder
- bitte korrigieren sie dies!

Vielen Dank
Ramin Mohazzab

question

Hello,
My question is this: How long does it take to update a program in your
repositories?

I have installed SWORD from your repo and the official release was
updated last month. And now I'm waiting when it will be available on
your server.
I'm sorry for the question, but I'm new in Linux and learning things, so
please, no offense.

Best regards,
Boguslaw Kluz

--

-- 
*********************************************************
Dla tych, co maja i wiedza jak, 
prosze szyfrowac wiadomosci do mnie kluczem z zalacznika.
A tym co nie maja, to polecam PGP.

For those who have and know,
please, encrypt messages for me with attached key.
Those who don't have, I recomend PGP.
*********************************************************

_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
Packman@...
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: datenschutz

Am Donnerstag 04 Februar 2010 schrieb Ramin Mohazzab:
> Guten Tag!
> ich habe ein Paket vorgeschlagen - dies per email. jetzt finde ich
> mich doch tatsächlich mit meiner privaten Emailadresse im Netz
>  wieder - bitte korrigieren sie dies!

rm /dev/internet funktioniert leider nicht.
Schreib halt nicht an mailinglisten.
Gib mal deinen namen bei google ein.
http://de-de.facebook.com/ramin.mohazzab ?

Re: [PM] XBMC 9.11-1.pm.1.6 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)

Am Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2010 schrieb Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek:
> Hi,
>
> I thought there _must_ be something wrong with your packages.
>
<snip>

> I won't ever compile XBMC on my own. It's power and time loss. You're
> telling you give RPMs, then you're responsible.
LOL, Nobody forces you to use this package. And you use all of our packages at 
your own risk :)

We do our best and if it doesn't work for you, why not writing DIRECTLY to 
us ? Instead of doing so, you post in several communities and tracs. Do you 
really think we must read and search for such comments ?

If you have a problem with one of our packages, the first thing should be to 
write a email to package-maintainer or packman mailing-list.

Just my 2cent.

--

-- 
have fun
Toni

Re: [PM] XBMC 9.11-1.pm.1.6 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)

Il 04/02/2010 22:11, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> I thought there _must_ be something wrong with your packages.
> 
> Multiple people on forums (both openSUSE and XBMC) report, that packaged by 
> you XBMC crashes and vanilla one doesn't.
> 
> Just take a look at fresh one here: 
> http://xbmc.org/forum/showthread.php?p=501161
> 
> I was getting the same log and debug backtrace since I have upgraded to 
> openSUSE 11.2.
> 
> [Here I wanted to scream, until I resolved the bug, while was writing this e-
> mail.]
> 

please check this:

http://xbmc.org/forum/showthread.php?t=66406

looks that IS AN UPSTREAM BUG THEY ALREADY KNOW!

the only patch that may do something wrong is the
"no-return-in-non-void-function" that probably showed better this bug.

> Multiple times I shared this link and will do this again and again, until 
> somebody gets interested: http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/8187