opkg | 22 Apr 13:43 2014

Re: Issue 88 in opkg: Package is listed as installed even though permission error occured while extracting its contents

Updates:
	Status: Fixed

Comment #24 on issue 88 by paul.betafive: Package is listed as installed  
even though permission error occured while extracting its contents
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=88

Changing the status line format breaks existing scripts so I'm not going to  
do it for now. I've made the change so that the line should read "Status:  
install reinst-required half-installed" which is about as clear as I can  
make things without breaking the format. I think that should close this out  
for now.

--

-- 
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

opkg | 21 Apr 21:51 2014

Issue 129 in opkg: Customisable uid/gid translation during installation

Status: Accepted
Owner: paul.betafive
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Milestone-0.3

New issue 129 by paul.betafive: Customisable uid/gid translation during  
installation
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=129

Tar archives can contain uids/gids and/or user/group names. When extracting  
to the filesystem we need to determine what uid/gid is used for created  
files. We should broadly support three options:

1) Use the uids/gids from the archive with no modification.
2) Resolve the user/group names into uids/gids using the default local  
method (generally passwd and group lookup).
3) Custom translation, such as using replacement passwd and group files or  
passing user/group names to an external program for translation.

It should be possible to choose between these options at runtime via conf  
options.

Currently listed for v0.3.0 release but may be bumped back to v0.4.0.

--

-- 
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

(Continue reading)

opkg | 20 Apr 11:20 2014

Issue 128 in opkg: error message if a conffile was changed

Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 128 by muuscl...@...: error message if a conffile was  
changed
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=128

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. install a package that contain a conffile
2. change this conffile
3. upgrade the package

What is the expected output?
An simple message (not an error) that the existing conffile different from  
the conffile in the new package.

What do you see instead?
An error message that inform about this.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
0.2.1 on MLD Linux

Please provide any additional information below.
Since this is not an error, it should not have the headline "Collected  
errors". It would be better if this issue has the headline "Collected  
informations".
The problem is, that I get often requests from customers, who want to know,  
what they have done wrong.

(Continue reading)

opkg | 20 Apr 11:00 2014

Issue 127 in opkg: upgrade command do an install

Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 127 by muuscl...@...: upgrade command do an install
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=127

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. call "opkg-cl upgrade PACKAGE_NAME"
2. PACKAGE_NAME is a not installed package

What is the expected output?
I expected to get an error message, that the package is not installed yet.

What do you see instead?
The package will be installed like as I do an "opkg-cl install ..."

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
0.2.1 on Linux

Please provide any additional information below.

--

-- 
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

Mathias Kunert | 17 Apr 19:39 2014
Picon

[PATCH] opkg_download: add https proxy support

The environment variable 'https_proxy' is required by libcurl to use a 
proxy for https targets.
The patch also uses CURLOPT_PROXYUSERNAME and CURLOPT_PROXYPASSWORD 
instead of CURLOPT_PROXYUSERPWD to set the user credentials for the 
proxy.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Kunert <mathias.kunert@...>
---
 libopkg/opkg_conf.c     |  1 +
 libopkg/opkg_conf.h     |  1 +
 libopkg/opkg_download.c | 15 +++++++++------
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libopkg/opkg_conf.c b/libopkg/opkg_conf.c
index 843f509..779906e 100644
--- a/libopkg/opkg_conf.c
+++ b/libopkg/opkg_conf.c
 <at>  <at>  -60,6 +60,7  <at>  <at>  static opkg_option_t options[] = {
           { "check_signature", OPKG_OPT_TYPE_BOOL, &_conf.check_signature },
 	  { "ftp_proxy", OPKG_OPT_TYPE_STRING, &_conf.ftp_proxy },
 	  { "http_proxy", OPKG_OPT_TYPE_STRING, &_conf.http_proxy },
+	  { "https_proxy", OPKG_OPT_TYPE_STRING, &_conf.https_proxy },
 	  { "no_proxy", OPKG_OPT_TYPE_STRING, &_conf.no_proxy },
 	  { "test", OPKG_OPT_TYPE_BOOL, &_conf.noaction },
 	  { "noaction", OPKG_OPT_TYPE_BOOL, &_conf.noaction },
diff --git a/libopkg/opkg_conf.h b/libopkg/opkg_conf.h
index 87a4d84..5b40d2c 100644
--- a/libopkg/opkg_conf.h
+++ b/libopkg/opkg_conf.h
 <at>  <at>  -122,6 +122,7  <at>  <at>  typedef struct opkg_conf {
(Continue reading)

Stefano Cordibella | 2 Apr 12:28 2014
Picon

dist-upgrade feature plan?

Hi all, I would like to know if there are any plan to integrate a feature like dist-upgrade in the roadmap. I
mean an implicit method to change feed files.
Looking into the roadmap I haven't see anything like this, it could be a very useful feature our target ...

opkg | 2 Apr 13:22 2014

Issue 126 in opkg: dist-upgrade feature

Status: New
Owner: ----

New issue 126 by stefano....@...: dist-upgrade feature
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=126

Inrtoduce a dist-upgrade command that update only feed files in order to  
perform a distribution upgrade.

--

-- 
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

Paul Barker | 1 Apr 23:36 2014
Picon

Fixing the libopkg API

So I know this has been discussed in passing while looking at other
issues, I've been trying to think of a sensible path forward which
doesn't surprise people too much.

I recommend that we deprecate the libopkg API in the v0.3 release.
That is, we don't build the API or install headers by default. An
option would be added to configure, '--enable-libopkg-api', which
would print a warning about the deprecation and then build what was
requested. This should be highlighted in the release notes.

Then during the development cycle for v0.4 we're free to design and
implement a new API, preferably re-implementing the opkg command on
top of the new libopkg API.

I'm happy to start discussing the possible API now but I don't want
any code changes to implement a new API until after the v0.3 release.

How does that sound?

--

-- 
Paul Barker

Email: paul@...
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk

Paul Barker | 1 Apr 23:08 2014
Picon

opkg-0.2.2 release

Hi all,

I'd like to announce the release of opkg-0.2.2 as of 2014-04-01.

This release will soon be available from the new download location with hosting
provided by The Yocto Project:

    http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/opkg/opkg-0.2.2.tar.gz

It is also mirrored at:

    http://www.paulbarker.me.uk/dist/opkg/opkg-0.2.2.tar.gz

The gpg signature of the release archive is attached to this email if
you wish the verify you've got an unmodified file.

Many thanks to everyone who's contributed!

Release Notes for opkg-0.2.2
============================

This is a straightforward bugfix release which solves the following issues:

- Fix '--force-reinstall' flag so that it acts as an upgrade rather than
  removing possibly critical packages before reinstall (issue 71)

- Symlinks are now correctly removed during package uninstall (issue 91)

- Fixed help and manual pages to reflect that shell globs not true regexps are
  accepted by opkg (issue 107)
(Continue reading)

opkg | 22 Mar 18:49 2014

Re: Issue 124 in opkg: Upgrade of a package do not upgrade the depends


Comment #6 on issue 124 by paul.betafive: Upgrade of a package do not  
upgrade the depends
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=124

I've added a test for this issue in the latest git commit to the master  
branch. The test currently fails as expected.

--

-- 
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

opkg | 20 Mar 19:25 2014

Re: Issue 88 in opkg: Package is listed as installed even though permission error occured while extracting its contents


Comment #23 on issue 88 by paul.betafive: Package is listed as installed  
even though permission error occured while extracting its contents
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/issues/detail?id=88

Though looking at the current code it may be easier to print the  
line "Status: want=%s flags=%s status=%s\n" with the appropriate  
substitutions. That would probably be clear enough.

--

-- 
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings


Gmane