James | 12 Jun 2006 08:53
Picon
Favicon

Re: status 2.0.3

on 07/06/2006 20:31 Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi Martin,

Martin Hollmichel schrieb:

and all thought 2.0.3 release is almost done. I just wanted to ask here on this list before I set 2.0.3 target for another rc :(

<snip>
Will the wiki be updated to show a new release date?
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease203

Regards,
James
--
www.8daysaweek.co.uk
User-Focused Site | Forums | Help Centre | Easy Installation CDs | Portable OOo on USB Keys
OpenOffice.org - a compatible alternative to Microsoft Office

www.OOoMacros.org
A repository for OOo macros/add-ins, and documentation about writing macros and/or extending OpenOffice.org

Andre Schnabel | 12 Jun 2006 21:26
Picon

Re: status 2.0.3

HI James, *

James schrieb:
> Will the wiki be updated to show a new release date?
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease203

fair question.

Martin: do we have an idea, when we will get the fixes and could build RC6?
If yes .. we should update the wiki with new dates.
If no, we should rather remove the dates for release for the moment 
(better to have no dates than wrong dates).

André
NAKATA Maho | 13 Jun 2006 23:32
Picon

OpenOffice.org 2.0.3rc5 package for FreeBSD/amd64

Hi,
I uploaded OpenOffice.org 2.0.3rc5 package for FreeBSD/amd64 at
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/misc/
.
packages are:
OOo_2.0.3rc5_FreeBSD61X86_64_SDK.tar.bz2
OOo_2.0.3rc5_FreeBSD61X86_64_URE.tar.bz2
OOo_2.0.3rc5_FreeBSD61X86_64_install_en-US.tbz  
and md5sums are followings:
dd9abcaf26b5ad996eb3019667a2b7d4  OOo_2.0.3rc5_FreeBSD61X86_64_SDK.tar.bz2
efd53645738ee32875f2d60d7d1a8158  OOo_2.0.3rc5_FreeBSD61X86_64_URE.tar.bz2
72585b105760f7dbfa95913b576a1987  OOo_2.0.3rc5_FreeBSD61X86_64_install_en-US.tbz 

still there are some critical issues, though.
o use KDE instead of GTK
o XIM must be killed

sorry I've never tried these ;)
We thank very much to Jung-uk Kim, who worked very hard for this port.
thanks,
-- NAKATA, Maho (maho <at> FreeBSD.org)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-openoffice <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-openoffice-unsubscribe <at> freebsd.org"

Jung-uk Kim | 15 Jun 2006 04:35
Picon
Favicon

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.3rc5 package for FreeBSD/amd64

On Tuesday 13 June 2006 05:32 pm, NAKATA Maho wrote:
> still there are some critical issues, though.
> o use KDE instead of GTK

Source:	vcl/unx/gtk/gdi/salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx

I think GTK_WIDGET_DRAWABLE() check is missing and 
gtk_widget_style_get() causes SIGSEGV at libglib-2.0.so when the 
widget is not drawable.  I was able to run it by adding more checks.

> o XIM must be killed

Source:	vcl/unx/source/app/i18n_ic.cxx

XIMStatusCallbacks and XIMPreeditCallbacks cause SIGSEGV at libX11.so.  
I don't know how to fix it but you can work around it by skipping 
them.  XIM seems to work without them.

I have no idea how they work on i386.  Anybody with more clues, please 
fix them.  I mean, correctly.

Thanks,

Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-openoffice <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-openoffice-unsubscribe <at> freebsd.org"

Jung-uk Kim | 16 Jun 2006 03:35
Picon
Favicon

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.3rc5 package for FreeBSD/amd64

On Wednesday 14 June 2006 10:35 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2006 05:32 pm, NAKATA Maho wrote:
> > still there are some critical issues, though.
> > o use KDE instead of GTK
>
> Source:	vcl/unx/gtk/gdi/salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx
>
> I think GTK_WIDGET_DRAWABLE() check is missing and
> gtk_widget_style_get() causes SIGSEGV at libglib-2.0.so when the
> widget is not drawable.  I was able to run it by adding more
> checks.
>
> > o XIM must be killed
>
> Source:	vcl/unx/source/app/i18n_ic.cxx
>
> XIMStatusCallbacks and XIMPreeditCallbacks cause SIGSEGV at
> libX11.so. I don't know how to fix it but you can work around it by
> skipping them.  XIM seems to work without them.
>
> I have no idea how they work on i386.  Anybody with more clues,
> please fix them.  I mean, correctly.

I found correct fixes and it was surprisingly simple bug.  I will post 
it when I am done testing.  But I am worried there are more of these 
buglets. :-(

Hint:	0 != (void *)0 on 64-bit platforms. ;-)

Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-openoffice <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-openoffice-unsubscribe <at> freebsd.org"


Gmane