1 Dec 2011 03:04
Re: GEM's minimum requirements
Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans <at> at.or.at>
2011-12-01 02:04:51 GMT
2011-12-01 02:04:51 GMT
On Nov 30, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > Le 2011-11-30 à 11:13:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit : > >> That should defintiely work, I've run it on slower machines. It depends a lot on your graphics card too. As for video playback, if you want to manipulate the video, then you should convert it to a JPEG (aka MJPEG) codec. .mov is a pretty common container format for JPEG videos. > > There are three different codecs named JPEG, MJPEG-A and MJPEG-B. They are very similar but not fully interchangeable. So, you can't just say «aka». I say 'aka' because unfortunately its not that simple. I believe that Apple labeled JPEG in .mov as "Motion JPEG" for a while, and it was just a JPEG codec. But it was not MJPEG. So the whole naming is messed up. In any case, JPEG is the one that most people want. .hc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls you." - Richard M. Stallman _______________________________________________ Pd-list <at> iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
? What are the minimum
> requirements to play a video with GEM?
> Is there any optimization possible, like using videos encoded with a
> lighter video codec, or something like this?
> I'm using Debian with open video drivers (ATI dropped the support for
> the laptop's video card).
>
> Thanks!
>
Thank you for all your advices.
Yesterday I tried to playback different codecs and formats.
With a mjpeg I had 60-70% of CPU load; Previously I tested a mpeg-2 and
the CPU load went to 90%.
In both situation the speed of the video playback was slower than
normal, even changing the fps of GEM.
I tested the patch on another laptop (core2duo with Debian) and the
video playback ran smooth with ATI proprietary drivers (fglrx) but it
ran slow with open drivers, so I think it's only a video driver problem.
RSS Feed