Cheryl BOSTON | 8 Sep 09:37 2010
Picon

MISS PIGGY

Click Here to Enter Site:

 >>> http://netresults-online.com/1/miss-piggy <<<

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

(Continue reading)

Wallace Lacy | 8 Sep 11:13 2010
Picon

ADULT CHANNEL

Click Here to Enter Site:

 >>> http://netresults-online.com/1/adult-channel <<<

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

(Continue reading)

Chance Cano | 8 Sep 15:24 2010
Picon

SPANISH PORN

.

.

Click Here to Enter Site:

 >>> http://netresults-online.com/2/spanish-porn <<<

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

(Continue reading)

DQ | 26 Sep 03:00 2010
Picon

JavaScript Benchmark and more

Results were astonishing: latest Chrome (7.0.517.17) at 352ms, Opra
10.62 at 367ms, and latest Minefield 32bit [with hardware acceleration
enabled] at 502ms, while the 64bit Minefield browser [with hardware
acceleration enabled] (latest) measured 631.4ms! (link below),
especially because my system is high-end (Quad core 2.66Ghz, 3MB
cache, 4GB DDR3 RAM with Vista 6bit) and 4the MOZdev team boasts FF4b
to be fast.

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B34,35,35,35,35%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B15,16,15,15,16%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B45,43,42,43,42%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B9,120,10,9,9%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B23,24,22,23,26%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B9,8,9,8,9%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B8,8,9,8,9%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B1,1,1,1,1%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B11,11,11,11,11%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B3,3,3,2,3%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B7,7,7,7,7%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B6,6,6,6,6%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B24,26,24,24,24%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B10,10,10,10,9%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B5,5,5,5,5%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B33,33,33,33,158%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B207,37,36,36,36%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B16,16,15,16,16%5D,%22
 math-partial-sums%22:%5B13,14,13,13,14%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B11,12,12,11,12%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B42,45,46,42,46%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B6,6,6,6,6%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B22,22,
 21,21,22%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B30,149,30,145,30%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B47,47,47,47,47%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B12,12,124,12,12%5D%7D

its amazing really, how Opera, with LESS market share, is having
Mozilla run for its life! Also, Opera has added numerous high-demand
UI features, like consolidated menu, tabs in title bar, bookmarks/
downloads/history on toggle, and more.

Even after SIX betas and nightly  updates, MOZdev has barely  shed any
light on these issues.

So, Mozilla, what gives?
Boris Zbarsky | 26 Sep 03:10 2010
Picon

Re: JavaScript Benchmark and more

On 9/25/10 9:00 PM, DQ wrote:
> Results were astonishing

They were?

> latest Chrome (7.0.517.17) at 352ms, Opra 10.62 at 367ms, and latest Minefield 32bit [with hardware acceleration
> enabled]  at 502ms, while the 64bit Minefield browser [with hardware
 > acceleration enabled] (latest) measured 631.4ms! (link below),

You're running sunspider.  Hardware acceleration is irrelevant.

Why is any of this astonishing?  http://arewefastyet.com/ has all this data.

> especially because my system is high-end (Quad core 2.66Ghz, 3MB
> cache, 4GB DDR3 RAM with Vista 6bit) and 4the MOZdev team boasts FF4b
> to be fast.

You seem to think that "fast" is a one-dimensional absolute metric.

The Fx4 betas are generally much faster than Fx 3.6.

On some tasks, the Fx4 betas are much faster than Opera or Chrome.

On some tasks, the Fx4 betas are much slower than Opera or Chrome.

And in fact, the same will probably be true for the final release.  Some 
things will be faster; some will be slower.  It's up to you whether the 
things that matter to you personally are performance of web apps or 
execution time of a buggy benchmark that has code that's specifically 
designed to make some browsers run slower by executing different tasks 
(Continue reading)

Boris Zbarsky | 26 Sep 14:16 2010
Picon

Re: JavaScript Benchmark and more

On 9/25/10 9:00 PM, DQ wrote:
> its amazing really, how Opera, with LESS market share, is having
> Mozilla run for its life!

One other note.  It's amazing, really, how Opera, with more money and 
more employees last I checked, has less market share....

-Boris
DQ | 28 Sep 18:53 2010
Picon

Re: JavaScript Benchmark and more

 <at> Boris

minefield x64: http://dromaeo.com/?id=118624
chrome 7.0.5171.17dev: http://dromaeo.com/?id=118625

apart from js performance, there's several UI features  ( tabs in
titlebar, single menu pane, etc.) that need to addressed. stylish may
have worked around some, but native implementation not only addresses
overall browser performance, but also code-level is better, i think.

i only wish ff4 to be superior.
Boris Zbarsky | 28 Sep 20:08 2010
Picon

Re: JavaScript Benchmark and more

On 9/28/10 12:53 PM, DQ wrote:
>  <at> Boris
>
> minefield x64: http://dromaeo.com/?id=118624
> chrome 7.0.5171.17dev: http://dromaeo.com/?id=118625

You're not telling me anything I don't know here.... ;)

-Boris

Gmane