headers
Fred Higgins | 1 Jan 2003 02:11
Picon

A new breed of free email! Worldwide access including WWW, Outlook, mobiles/PDAs etc.!

Being a gadget freak I own a T68I, T39, 6310I, 7650, 8310, and an IPAQ 3970. I've spent many an hour looking for
a unified email solution that would enable me to access my email from not only my *favorite email client &
web browser* but also my *mobile devices* as well. Eventually I found a solution offered by UPO, here's the
link : 

http://www.universalpostoffice.com

They also offer you a variety of available email addresses including such as mymobile.net, and various
other phone/PDA type domains. They're even including 10mb of storage and POP3 access and aren't charging
a cent. For how long I don't know. BTW, easy access via GPRS/CSD with any built-in phone email client like
the 7650 or T68(I) has!
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
no.email.address.entered | 2 Jan 2003 20:45
Picon

veoweb.net - Premium web hosting -- cheap and fast! 55701

Visit http://www.veoweb.net/ to see our special offers.  We will allow you to host every sort of site on our
servers, as long as you pay our low per/GB charges for site usage.  Try us and find out.  No obligation!

Mention PROMO CODE 64876 and get two months FREE.

Sincerely,
Jason
http://www.veoweb.net/
support <at> veoweb.net


;^N>VgJI34bq-]&\,J_KF<[V$at%w2OQvx/X7j+cn6D2h`a^fM
AM(V=X_dU'Y4rkWzjZr+feP8g4JbB`HO"gcXxr <at> f7A:NTm9;K\
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
no.email.address.entered | 3 Jan 2003 00:47
Picon

www.veoweb.net - Premium web hosting -- cheap and fast! 20048

Visit http://www.veoweb.net/ to see our special offers.  We will allow you to host every sort of site on our
servers, as long as you pay our low per/GB charges for site usage.  Try us and find out.  No obligation!

Mention PROMO CODE 64876 and get two months FREE.

Sincerely,
Benjamin
http://www.veoweb.net/
info <at> veoweb.net


zK$YU6#F5%=O11ttJXnEgCl2G2.#C>eI[e_s78]`p?xQlKVv+r
OGHEN4(5i=$ <at> FK=h <at> uZR?bQBYkNM7yNu1J*H/6cNJ <at> _Z(Mw("6
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Eriam Schaffter | 11 Jan 2003 12:42
Gravatar

Npl & private use issue.

Hi all ..

I've _added_ a few lines of code in the navigator.xul (licensed under 
npl) file from chrome/comm.jar, my questions are

can I use it for my customers under a different brand ?
can I distribute it under a different brand ?

tia

eriam
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Daniel Veditz | 14 Jan 2003 23:37
Picon

Re: Npl & private use issue.

Gervase Markham wrote:
>>I've _added_ a few lines of code in the navigator.xul (licensed under 
>>npl) file from chrome/comm.jar, my questions are
>>
>>can I use it for my customers under a different brand ?
>>can I distribute it under a different brand ?
> 
> 
> What do you mean by "under a different brand"? And when you say "it", do 
> you mean your additions, or the entire file?

If by "brand" you mean can you distribute the "Eriam Schaffter" browser
rather than "Mozilla" then yes, that's what AOL does to produce the Netscape
browser. But the source code is still under the Mozilla Public License and
you must follow its requirements. These include telling your customers in
some prominent place that your product was derived from Mozilla code and
where they can get the source code (for details see the license). Since you
have modified the basic Mozilla source you must also distribute your
Modifications.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Gervase Markham | 20 Jan 2003 10:25
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Netscape legal trickery?

andkonDOTcom wrote:
> http://www.andkon.com/stuf/mozilla3/
> 
> Okay read specifically the section "Netscape Fraud" where I ramble
> about the Netscape license. I understand the Netscape License to mean
> that they do not have to release some part of modified code as open
> source. 

It means if Netscape, for example, included the JavaScript engine in a 
server product, they would not have to open source any part of that 
server product.

However, the NPL exceptions have no real impact on Mozilla development 
today, because there is so much MPLed code in the tree that Netscape 
would probably have great difficulty extracting a large enough NPLed 
piece to be useful in something else.

Gerv
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Per Lundberg | 23 Jan 2003 19:17

mfcembed license?

Hello, 

I asked in another group but this is probably a better place.  What is
the intended license of the mfcembed program?  In mfcembed.cpp I see this:

 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
 * copy of this Mozilla sample software and associated documentation files
 * (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
 * without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
 * distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit
 * persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the
 * following conditions:
 *
 * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included
 * in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
 *
 * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
 * OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
 * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
 * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
 * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
 * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

In other words, a standard MIT license.  But some other files in the
same directory, even files written by the same person, look like this:

 * Version: NPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1
 *
 * The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public License
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Adrian Tarau | 27 Jan 2003 10:56
Picon

Phoenix(Mozilla) license questio

Hi,

I'm interested to use Mozilla in a comercial project and after I study the
license file I underteud I can use Mozilla in a commercial application, but
I want to change also the splash screen.

I don't know what are to role or if I can make this change.

Could anyone tell me if I can do this?

Thanks.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Gervase Markham | 27 Jan 2003 12:03
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Open-Source Licenses & Anonymity

> So I must make the program open-source (which is fine, as I am a huge
> fan of the open-source community), but AFAIK (and IANAL and know that
> YANAL also) a program must be copyrighted before a license is added. 
> Can I just put "Copyright 2003 Anonymous" before the license, may I just
> leave out the copyright notice altogether (as everything is
> automatically copyrighted by the Berne convention), or is there some
> other way to legally license a program anonymously?  Thanks in advance! 

A copyright only really makes sense if the person with the copyright is 
named, and also willing to litigate to enforce the copyright.

If I were you, I would merely release the code with an open-source 
license, anonymously, and not worry. This gives people who want to play 
by the rules assurance that they are not violating someone's copyright 
by using it under the terms of said license. Without the willingness to 
sue, you can't do anything about people who don't play by the rules anyway.

Gerv
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Gervase Markham | 27 Jan 2003 12:04
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Phoenix(Mozilla) license questio

Adrian Tarau wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm interested to use Mozilla in a comercial project and after I study the
> license file I underteud I can use Mozilla in a commercial application, but
> I want to change also the splash screen.
> 
> I don't know what are to role or if I can make this change.

There is nothing in the license which forbids you to make this change.

Gerv
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane