PhillipJones | 1 Jan 2012 01:51
Gravatar

Re: ChrisI

Mike Easter wrote:
> PhillipJones wrote:
>
>> He's good at supplying answers but as moderator he is a bully.
>
> This thread isn't about Chris bullying.
>
> This thread is about Ron's paranoia - mistaken interpretation - causing
> him to believe that a normal appropriately trimmed reply in a thread in
> which both he and Chris both participated was somehow an attempt on
> Chris's part to somehow 'detract' from what Ron said.
>
> The truth of the matter is that the trimming was exactly right and
> appropriate, not any kind of detraction from or misrepresentation of
> what Ron said.
>
> It should not be necessary to quote every word of what someone posted
> before you to prevent the cited individual from misinterpreting the fact
> that trimming some of the words is not an attempt to misconstrue what
> the cited person said.
>
> There was no abuse or bullying of Ron in the example of this thread.
>
>
>
Sure! naturally everyone going to Chris defense. He never does anything 
Wrong.

What a waste of time. He has got a whole bunch of Colleagues that will 
come to his defense whether he does anything wrong or not.
(Continue reading)

PhillipJones | 1 Jan 2012 01:56
Gravatar

Re: mozilla.announce

Tony Mechelynck wrote:
------------------snip------------------
>>>> This is a serious question.
>>>>
>>>> If FireFox shares code with SeaMonkey, and Thunderbird shares with
>>>> SeaMonkey auroa.
>>>>
>>>> Explain why there has to be two/three versions for same extension?
>>>> why can't there be one version for FF/SM (ex: HTML Validator) or One
>>>> for
>>>> SM/TB (ex: like QuoteColor), and anything works SM/FF should work for
>>>> Auroa
>>>> There should be no difference, it should just work. It should key on
>>>> Mozilla not FireFox, SeaMonkey, Thunderbird, Auroa. Its as though
>>>> extension developers are using something like what they do on websites
>>>> to find out what Browser you use to determine the site is viewed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think the devil is in the details. While all three share much code,
>>> the extensions often deal with those parts that are different, thus need
>>> to be somewhat different, even if what they do is exactly the same.
>>>
>>
>> Still looks like they could put all of it in one file.
>>
>
> It varies quite a lot depending on what the extension does and how.
>
> Some extensions (e.g. Nightly Tester Tools) use only functions common to
> all Toolkit applications on all platforms, and of these extensions a
(Continue reading)

glad2be | 1 Jan 2012 02:22

Jerry lovers

to all you Jerry lovers, Seinfeld and Springer, that is.

have a Happy New Year.

--

-- 
peace out.

tc, hago.

walking the walk. long live tux.

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*
WLS | 1 Jan 2012 02:37

Re: Jerry lovers

On 12/31/2011 08:22 PM, glad2be <at> linuxuser.iam aliandika:
> to all you Jerry lovers, Seinfeld and Springer, that is.
> 
> have a Happy New Year.
> 
> 

That leaves me out. I'm a Pauly Perrette fan.

Happy New Year!

--

-- 

 Beta | openSUSE 11.4(x86_64) | Gnome 2.32.1 | 1.8GHz CPU | 2GB RAM
 Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en
 Firefox Support: http://support.mozilla.org
 Profile Manager: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager
Ron Hunter | 1 Jan 2012 03:08
Favicon

Re: ChrisI

On 12/31/2011 5:44 PM, goodwin wrote:
> On 12/31/2011 03:20 PM, Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>>> one should have learned to quote in 1st...
>
>> Well, if you had quoted the entire/most message and interspersed then
>> all would be quite satisfactory.
>
> there was zero need to quote the entire message to get an answer to my
> question, which is all I wanted - I actually thought for a moment he was
> referring to ME's post, since Ron's paragraph didn't apply at all.
> Why/where would I intersperse?

There would have been NO confusion, had the thread NOT BEEN TRIMMED, by 
several people!
Ron Hunter | 1 Jan 2012 03:06
Favicon

Re: ChrisI

On 12/31/2011 12:54 PM, Mike Easter wrote:
> PhillipJones wrote:
>
>> He's good at supplying answers but as moderator he is a bully.
>
> This thread isn't about Chris bullying.
>
> This thread is about Ron's paranoia - mistaken interpretation - causing
> him to believe that a normal appropriately trimmed reply in a thread in
> which both he and Chris both participated was somehow an attempt on
> Chris's part to somehow 'detract' from what Ron said.
>
> The truth of the matter is that the trimming was exactly right and
> appropriate, not any kind of detraction from or misrepresentation of
> what Ron said.
>
> It should not be necessary to quote every word of what someone posted
> before you to prevent the cited individual from misinterpreting the fact
> that trimming some of the words is not an attempt to misconstrue what
> the cited person said.
>
> There was no abuse or bullying of Ron in the example of this thread.
>
>
>
No, it was an attempt to MODIFY what I said.  And if you had as many 
posts cancelled, without cause, as I have, you might enjoy a bit of that 
'paranoia' as well.
And is must be nice to be able to read ChrisI's mind.  Next time I want 
to know what he is thinking, I will ask you.
(Continue reading)

goodwin | 1 Jan 2012 03:18
Picon

Re: ChrisI

On 12/31/2011 06:08 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
> On 12/31/2011 5:44 PM, goodwin wrote:
>> On 12/31/2011 03:20 PM, Jay Garcia wrote:
>>
>>>> one should have learned to quote in 1st...
>>
>>> Well, if you had quoted the entire/most message and interspersed then
>>> all would be quite satisfactory.
>>
>> there was zero need to quote the entire message to get an answer to my
>> question, which is all I wanted - I actually thought for a moment he was
>> referring to ME's post, since Ron's paragraph didn't apply at all.
>> Why/where would I intersperse?
>
> There would have been NO confusion, had the thread NOT BEEN TRIMMED, by
> several people!
>

sorry, Ron, but the problem is /had not been trimmed correctly/ .

You are correct using the assumption most can't figure out how to do 
this and many don't want to bother since they a.) don't like to be told 
what to do or b.) won't break old habits.
goodwin | 1 Jan 2012 03:19
Picon

Re: Jerry lovers

On 12/31/2011 05:37 PM, WLS wrote:
> On 12/31/2011 08:22 PM, glad2be <at> linuxuser.iam aliandika:
>> to all you Jerry lovers, Seinfeld and Springer, that is.
>>
>> have a Happy New Year.
>>
>>
>
> That leaves me out. I'm a Pauly Perrette fan.
>
> Happy New Year!
>
Totally cool - I sleep in a coffin too...
Rinaldi J. Montessi | 1 Jan 2012 05:02

Re: Yo, Jay!

The Real Bev wrote:
-----------
> That's the only good example I've ever seen.  Two suicides, one brain 
> cancer, one too ill to post.  And those are just the ones that were 
> explained.

Hmm...  The common thread being you?

--

-- 
-Rinaldi-
i'm living so far beyond my income that we may almost be said to be
living apart.
		-- e. e. cummings
The Real Bev | 1 Jan 2012 05:05
Picon

Re: Yo, Jay!

On 12/31/2011 08:02 PM, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

> The Real Bev wrote: -----------
>> That's the only good example I've ever seen.  Two suicides, one
>> brain cancer, one too ill to post.  And those are just the ones
>> that were explained.
>
> Hmm...  The common thread being you?

Typhoid Bev, too bad you responded.  Nice knowing you, make sure
somebody reports back on your demise.  It's just common courtesy.

--

-- 
Cheers, Bev
*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
  It is just a bicycle. It is not dedication and bugs
  in your teeth and dust and rain and mud.  It is not
  madness and harmony and glory and rhythm. It is not
  muscle and flesh and sweat and lycra and wind.
  It is just a bicycle.                    -- Bianchi
*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*

Gmane