Ken Whiton | 1 Jun 2008 04:14

Re: Thanks for coming to my defense

*-* On Sat, 31 May 2008, at 19:54:28 +1000,
*-* In Article PfednQdUf9cRvdzVnZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d <at> mozilla.org,
*-* Daniel wrote
*-* About Re: Thanks for coming to my defense

> Ken Whiton wrote:
>> *-* Daniel wrote

>>> Dennis wrote:
>>>> Daniel wrote:

>>           [ ... ]

>>>>> ....and, to get this back on track, does everyone see the _
>>>>> before and after the "use" and the "you" in Tony's last reply??

>>>> Not any longer. The userChrome.css fix for it (in another thread)
>>>> worked for me *after* I got the chrome directory setup with the
>>>> spelling that TB (and also in SM) is expecting to see.

>>>> Leading and trailing *, _, and / are gone for me.

>>> *Note to self:* Get around to updating your userChrome.css file
>>> soon, will you??

>>      The fix in question goes in the *userContent.css* file, not the
>> userChrome.css file.  Here's the post containing it:

>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/msg/ef7a1987a8e7b27e

(Continue reading)

Chris Ilias | 1 Jun 2008 04:20
Picon
Favicon

Re: Help me plz

On 5/30/08 2:41 PM, _Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T_ spoke thusly:
> Chris Ilias wrote:
>> On 5/29/08 3:48 PM, _Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T_ spoke thusly:
>>
>>> My intent was only to reapply as a member because I received a 
>>> message That indicated I was not a member. That is the totality of 
>>> the reason. I believed I was no longer a member of the group.
>>
>> "reapply"?
>> You were *never* a mailing list member. You were on the auto-approve 
>> list.
>
> Well what did I apply for a few month ago.

Nothing. If you have an archive of your email, you'll see that on 
February 21, I told you that you were already on the auto-approve list.

> I think it was after the list 
> went quiet and people were reapplying to join the list.

That was a wrong assumption on your part.

> I'm not talking 
> about being a list member but a Group member In other words It appeared 
> from you email as administrator I wasn't allowed even post on the group.
> 
> I've never used Mail List its always been NNTP method for me.

Once again you are confusing the mailing list with the auto-approve 
list. If you're on neither, it doesn't mean you cannot post. It just 
(Continue reading)

Chris Ilias | 1 Jun 2008 04:25
Picon
Favicon

Re: Help me plz

On 5/30/08 5:19 PM, _Jay Garcia_ spoke thusly:
> On 29.05.2008 21:55, Chris Ilias wrote:
> 
>  --- Original Message ---
>> Yes, Jay I know (Gerv has forwarded you complaints to me. ;-) ).
>> Are you saying that whenever he posts OT, I should just let it go? If 
>> anything, this reinforces my argument that he can't make the judgement 
>> call himself, therefore his posts should not be automatically approved, 
>> but await moderator approval.
> 
> No, not special treatment but rather a better understanding of the
> poster's actions and rather than special treatment maybe a more extended
>  explanation of the desires of the moderator(s)

How much more? And how many times more? I've been explaining this to 
Phillip for the past two years. There's only so much a moderator can do 
before coming to the conclusion that Phillip will not be able to make 
the OT judgement call on his own.

And you were wrong about "we" being aware of the difference between the 
mailing list and the auto-approve list.

> rather than simply
> labeling of said poster as a renegade and other tags.

??
Your renegade comment is false. As I told told Phillip, the *only* 
reason to be a mailing list member (aside from receiving MTMM messages 
via email) is to post without moderation. There are almost 30 mailing 
list members with mail delivery turned off. Hardly a renegade.
(Continue reading)

Daniel | 1 Jun 2008 10:52
Picon

Re: Thanks for coming to my defense

Ken Whiton wrote:
> *-* On Sat, 31 May 2008, at 19:54:28 +1000,
> *-* In Article PfednQdUf9cRvdzVnZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d <at> mozilla.org,
> *-* Daniel wrote
> *-* About Re: Thanks for coming to my defense
> 
>> Ken Whiton wrote:
>>> *-* Daniel wrote
> 
>>>> Dennis wrote:
>>>>> Daniel wrote:
> 
>>>           [ ... ]
> 
>>>>>> ....and, to get this back on track, does everyone see the _
>>>>>> before and after the "use" and the "you" in Tony's last reply??
> 
>>>>> Not any longer. The userChrome.css fix for it (in another thread)
>>>>> worked for me *after* I got the chrome directory setup with the
>>>>> spelling that TB (and also in SM) is expecting to see.
> 
>>>>> Leading and trailing *, _, and / are gone for me.
> 
>>>> *Note to self:* Get around to updating your userChrome.css file
>>>> soon, will you??
> 
>>>      The fix in question goes in the *userContent.css* file, not the
>>> userChrome.css file.  Here's the post containing it:
> 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/msg/ef7a1987a8e7b27e
(Continue reading)

Daniel | 1 Jun 2008 11:05
Picon

Re: Thanks for coming to my defense

squaredancer wrote:
> On 31.05.2008 15:46, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused  Dennis to 
> generate the following:? :
>> Dennis wrote:
>>  
>>> Daniel wrote:
>>>    
>>>> squaredancer wrote:
>>>>      
>>>>> On 30.05.2008 11:26, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused  Daniel to 
>>>>> generate the following:? :
>>>>>        
>>>>>> Dennis wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>> Daniel wrote:
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>            
>>>>>>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>> On 30/05/08 02:56, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>                             
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/05/08 02:07, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
(Continue reading)

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T | 1 Jun 2008 16:27
Gravatar

Re: Help me plz

Chris Ilias wrote:
> On 5/30/08 2:41 PM, _Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T_ spoke thusly:
>> Chris Ilias wrote:
>>> On 5/29/08 3:48 PM, _Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T_ spoke thusly:
>>>
>>>> My intent was only to reapply as a member because I received a 
>>>> message That indicated I was not a member. That is the totality of 
>>>> the reason. I believed I was no longer a member of the group.
>>>
>>> "reapply"?
>>> You were *never* a mailing list member. You were on the auto-approve 
>>> list.
>>
>> Well what did I apply for a few month ago.
> 
> Nothing. If you have an archive of your email, you'll see that on 
> February 21, I told you that you were already on the auto-approve list.
> 
>> I think it was after the list went quiet and people were reapplying to 
>> join the list.
> 
> That was a wrong assumption on your part.
> 
>> I'm not talking about being a list member but a Group member In other 
>> words It appeared from you email as administrator I wasn't allowed 
>> even post on the group.
>>
>> I've never used Mail List its always been NNTP method for me.
> 
> Once again you are confusing the mailing list with the auto-approve 
(Continue reading)

JoeS | 2 Jun 2008 01:14
Picon

Get Digitized

It looks like you have Javascript disabled.
To view this post in the manner in which is was intended, enable Javascript.
I promise, it will not bite you.

I found this script interesting. For those that are not familiar with numbering systems, just wait until the seconds increment to
zero, and you will see that Octal digits range form 0-7 and hex from 0-f and decimal of course is 0-9
But..don't watch too long...You may get "Digitized"
  

JavaScript Clock

BTW, I know of no etiquette guidelines, or prohibitions to post this sort of thing in Moz.general
I'm not testing, or asking for help.
Just trying to be "amusing"

I don't see a lot of that these days at mozilla.org

--
JoeS

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general <at> lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general
Daniel | 2 Jun 2008 01:31
Picon

Re: Thanks for coming to my defense

squaredancer wrote:
> On 01.06.2008 11:05, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused  Daniel to 
> generate the following:? :
>> squaredancer wrote:
>>  
>>> On 31.05.2008 15:46, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused  Dennis to 
>>> generate the following:? :
>>>    
>>>> Dennis wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>      
>>>>> Daniel wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> squaredancer wrote:
>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> On 30.05.2008 11:26, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused  Daniel 
>>>>>>> to generate the following:? :
>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> Dennis wrote:
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>>>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                                  
>>>>>>>>>>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>                                        
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/05/08 02:56, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                              
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/05/08 02:07, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                          
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                     
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                            
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a matter of fact, I was also born with forceps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                             
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you were born with forceps? I'd like to have seen that. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                             
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was in 1951, at about 3am, and even the father wasn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the hospital room for childbirth at that time. As legend 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has it, he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waited in the corridor, lighting one cigarette on the stub 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous one, until the midwife (or maybe a nurse) came 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and told him:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "It's a boy!".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                               
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a boy, but he's got forceps!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                         
>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, maybe I expressed myself badly (English is not my mother 
>>>>>>>>>>>> language): the doctor decided that he had to _use_ forceps 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in order to make me get born. I wasn't born wearing them in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the fashion of a pair of horns. Now really, how come you 
>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't understand this?                             
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>> I knew exactly what you were saying.  I guess you couldn't 
>>>>>>>>>>> tell I was yanking your chain . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                        
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe _you_'re the one in the set who is mentally retarded?
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                   
>>>>>>>>>>> . . . and you call me mentally retarded
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                             
>>>>>>>>>> ....and, to get this back on track, does everyone see the _ 
>>>>>>>>>> before and after the "use" and the "you" in Tony's last reply??
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>                                       
>>>>>>>>> Not any longer. The userChrome.css fix for it (in another 
>>>>>>>>> thread) worked for me *after* I got the chrome directory setup 
>>>>>>>>> with the spelling that TB (and also in SM) is expecting to see.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Leading and trailing *, _, and / are gone for me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dennis
>>>>>>>>>                                 
>>>>>>>> *Note to self:* Get around to updating your userChrome.css file 
>>>>>>>> soon, will you??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>> personal note to Daniel:
>>>>>>> LESS drinkin, fewer wimmin, less lookin at the box
>>>>>>> MORE attention to detail :-P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reg
>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>> Note to self(again): Bugger!! Even after installing the userChrome 
>>>>>> stuff, I still see the * either side of *after* above!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note to self two: looks like the : may effect the * in *Note to 
>>>>>> self:* above, where the * are still there but the bold effect is 
>>>>>> absent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>                 
>>>>> I got rid of the userChrome.css that I had created and kept just 
>>>>> the userContent.css file. Everything is still working. All that is 
>>>>> in my userContent.css file is:
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Remove the *,/,_ characters for bold, italic, and underline from 
>>>>> text messages/posts */
>>>>>
>>>>> .moz-txt-star > .moz-txt-tag { display: none; }
>>>>> .moz-txt-slash > .moz-txt-tag { display: none; }
>>>>> .moz-txt-underscore > .moz-txt-tag { display: none; }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That file is:
>>>>> Thunderbird:
>>>>> /home/(user)/.thunderbird/(generated_string).default/chrome/userContent.css 
>>>>>
>>>>> Seamonkey:
>>>>> /home/(user)/.mozilla/seamonkey/(generated_string).default/chrome/userContent.css 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A capitalized 'Chrome' directory did *not* work for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>             
>>>> Hmmm, maybe it works to well! There should be a / before and after 
>>>> *home* in the two file paths above.
>>>> Dennis
>>>>         
>>> *LMAO* Dennis... you'all sure have created summat there.... "home" is 
>>> in italics, the rest not!
>>>
>>> reg
>>>     
>>
>> All better ..... and what a marvelous piece of detective work by me!!
>>
>> When I copied in the code to limit the width of the Bookmarks drop 
>> down, the close bracket should have been a } but had become a ), 
>> causing all the three lines of the _, / and * code to be ignored. Once 
>> I pick up the real error, all was well.
>>
>> Daniel
>>   
> 
> 
> OK - detective detected... slap him in irons and cut off his ISP...
> 
> good on ya, Daniel! glad to see things working "as normal"
> 
> reg

With my failing eyesight, it was a good bit of detective work, though!!

Daniel

Gmane