headers
GreyGoose | 1 Oct 2007 02:36

Re: Anyone know a telphone number for Comcast support

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote:
> Allan wrote:
>>
>> "Barbara" <junkgreen125 <at> hotmail.com> wrote in message 
>> news:vLednZoNb4-oTmPbnZ2dnUVZ_qLinZ2d <at> mozilla.org...
>>> On 9/29/2007 10:04 AM Pacific Time, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote 
>>> thusly:
>>>> Ron Hunter wrote:
>>>>> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote:
>>>>>> I have a cousin that is a Comcast Customer in Halifax PA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for the lat week I have been unable to write any messages to her
>>>>>> they all come back as delivery Failure and code they give 
>>>>>> indicates I or My ISP according to to the two services they give 
>>>>>> are listed as spam locations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My ISP has looked into the matter and looked at the two services 
>>>>>> they used plus all the other major spam Blacklisting services. 
>>>>>> Neither I nor they were listed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I called my cousin. She got in touch with them. they said send a 
>>>>>> request through there abuse email address.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've gotten nowhere with that either. I need a 800 number to call 
>>>>>> to yell and bless someone out maybe to get their attention.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Although it might not seem all that important if I needed to relay 
>>>>>> some information, about the family or what ever I can know longer 
>>>>>> do so. This happens whether I use TB or SM.
>>>>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ken Whiton | 1 Oct 2007 04:33

Re: Anyone know a telphone number for Comcast support

*-* On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:16:30 -0400,
*-* In Article SNGdnQPimYpzRGLbnZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d <at> mozilla.org,
*-* Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote
*-* About Re: Anyone know a telphone number for Comcast support

>>>>> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote:
>>>>>> I have a cousin that is a Comcast Customer in Halifax PA.

>>>>>> for the lat week I have been unable to write any messages to
>>>>>> her they all come back as delivery Failure and code they give
>>>>>> indicates I or My ISP according to to the two services they
>>>>>> give are listed as spam locations.

>>>>>> My ISP has looked into the matter and looked at the two
>>>>>> services they used plus all the other major spam Blacklisting
>>>>>> services. Neither I nor they were listed

           [ ... ]

> My local ISP is kimbanet.com and I have since found its is system
> wide any Comcast address will reject because the think my ISP is a
> Spam site.

> My ISP has checked with all the Blacklisting agencies and are not
> listed. on any.

      That's not surprising (at least not to me).  The chances are good
that Comcast doesn't use a public blacklist such as you describe, but
instead uses their own internally generated and maintained blacklist,
which includes your ISP's domain.  In that case, your cousin, as the
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
sean bean | 1 Oct 2007 15:24

Re: what's with the google download?

Alex K. wrote:
> Havlo wrote:
>> Alex K. wrote:
>>> If there is a "corruption process" here, I'm failing to see it.
>> yes, indeed you do fail to see it.
>>
>> google the huge data retention outfit thereby will correlate your unique 
>> ID in your stored cookie (for the typical user who hasn't disabled it) 
>> with a list of every website that the user visits. That's for the users 
>> who check every site they visit with data miner google. For the users 
>> who user the lookup list, they get to see google as the beneficent 
>> friend that helps them from bad guys. Talk about the fox guarding the 
>> henhouse.
> 
> But using the lookup list *is* the *default* behavior, as you argue below.
> 
>> are you also unaware that FF is paid by google? I can save some typing 
>> if you are are. I assume you are.
> 
> Sigh.
> 
> Yes, of course I am.  I still fail to see the "corruption process".
> 
>> are you also unaware of how defaults have a huge affect on what happens 
>> on the internet? The most obvious example in internet history is how M$ 
>> squashed Netscape, which previously had been #1 in browser competition. 
>> But M$ forced vendors like Gateway to include IE with every computer 
>> that shipped with Windows. M$ didn't win because they were better.
> 
> They won that war because of actions that were determined, by a court,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo | 2 Oct 2007 01:20
Picon

OT: Re: WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO ALL MY FRIGGEN BOOKMARKS??????????

Chris Ilias wrote:
> On 10/1/07 6:26 PM, _Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo_ spoke thusly:
>> since you don't want to take the time to do a few seconds of backups, 
>> then don't come back here complaining that you have a problem.
> 
> User-support newsgroups are here for people to *help* each other with 
> technical issues, not for insulting people and making users feel like 
> sinners, or for product advocacy.
> 
> If anyone loses data, they have every right to be upset. Programs 
> shouldn't lose user data, regardless if the user has made a backup. 
> Before anyone starts telling others not come back here, lets try some 
> empathy and patience. We're here to help, not scold.

Quote: "User-support newsgroups are here . . . not for 
insulting people and making users feel like sinners . . . 
We're here to help, not scold."  UnQuote

So, you tell someone not to do it, and yet turn around and 
do it yourself.

FU to the general

--

-- 
Please do not email me for help.  Reply to the newsgroup 
only.  And only click on the Reply button, not the Reply All 
or Reply to Author.  Thanks!

Peter Potamus & His Magic Flying Balloon:
http://www.toonopedia.com/potamus.htm
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
sean bean | 2 Oct 2007 02:07

Re: AV program

John Thompson wrote:
> On 2007-09-06, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T <pjones1 <at> kimbanet.com> wrote:
> 
>> Terry R. wrote:
> 
> 	[major clip...]
> 
>>> And you think it's because you use a Mac that people get upset at you?
> 
>>   Well that too! :-)
> 
> Wow. 156 lines of quoted material, and one line of response.
> 
> Sigh.
> 
if you don't want to read simply press K
-=-=-
... If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.

* TagZilla 0.066 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
sean bean | 3 Oct 2007 04:35

Re: AV program

goodwin wrote:
> On 9/4/2007 3:26 PM Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T typed out:
> 
>> Well in Va if you get caught without valid Auto insurance, you will have 
>> to pay instead of 37.50 per year registration fee to drive it 150.00. 
>> And if unless you pay this fee if you get caught by police you will 
>> receive $500.00 Court fine plus a recently passed $1500. Road fee. (to 
>> pay for road construction and repair).
>>
>> So it would cost you far more than what the cost of the Auto Policy is.
> 
> In Calif., they take the car as well

oh... i like that idea... no more unlicensed vehicles careening thru the 
streets at a hundred miles an hour...

hey... this is DC...
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Tommi Leino | 3 Oct 2007 08:56
Picon

Mozilla for an open ARM-based Mobile Linux platform

Movial is working with ARM and partners for contributing to Mozilla,
GNOME and other existing projects for helping the use and integration
of open source technology with mobile platforms. This builds on
existing work from open source developers and contributions from
companies building mobile devices. The main contributions will be
around the UI framework and browser technology. The libraries and
technologies used are familiar ones from Gnome Mobile stack. New
mobile components we will be working with are components like HAL,
Gnome Network Manager, Gnome Volume Manager and Mozilla-based browser.

This work aims at supporting existing efforts in building a complete
set of open source components targeting mobile platforms instead of
starting 'yet another new project'. ARM processors are widely used in
existing mobile platforms where power, performance and integration
are key. Cooperation with ARM and its partners should help in making
Mozilla, GNOME and related projects more successful components of
open source-based mobile devices. An important goal for the work
being done is to contribute to the respective open source projects.

With Mozilla we are working on optimizing memory usage, general
rendering (Cairo) and additional plugins and extensions. One
important discussion is also the UI toolkit and its integration
with the underlying platform.

Please feel free to ask questions, send comments and talk about
the subjects with ARM or Movial guys on various mailing lists and
IRC channels.

With best regards,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
smaug | 3 Oct 2007 11:48

Re: Mozilla for an open ARM-based Mobile Linux platform

Tommi Leino wrote:
> Please feel free to ask questions, send comments and talk about
> the subjects with ARM or Movial guys on various mailing lists and
> IRC channels.

And the relevant mailing lists and IRC channels are?

-S
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Tommi Leino | 3 Oct 2007 12:54
Picon

Re: Mozilla for an open ARM-based Mobile Linux platform

smaug <smaug <at> welho.com> wrote:
> And the relevant mailing lists and IRC channels are?

I was kind of expecting this question ;)

We are present at least here on mozilla.general, on
mobile-devel-list of gnome.org and I just created channel
#arm on irc.mozilla.org . 

Please, point us to more relevant mailing lists or channels.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo | 3 Oct 2007 19:35
Picon

OT: Re: Need site assistance

Danny Kile wrote:
> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>> Danny Kile wrote:
>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>>> Danny Kile wrote:
>>>>> Frosted Flake wrote:
>>>>>> IE works 
>>>>> This site worked for me with no problems, SM 1.1.4.  You may try 
>>>>> this just to see if this works install IETabs  and see if it works 
>>>>> that way.
>>>>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/1419
>>>> If the OP said it works with IE, then it will work with IEtabs.  So, 
>>>> whats the point!?
>>>>
>>> The point is that if he can not get it to work with SM directly and 
>>> still wants access without resorting to full IE use he can use IETab. 
>>> So what is you point!
>>>
>> when you're using IEtab, you're still using IE.  And the OP said it 
>> works in IE so whats the point of telling him about IEtab.
>>
> 
> When you are using IETabs , you're still using IE...  DUH! I realize 
> that, however if he can not get it to work with SM then it gives him 
> another option. He would not have to launch Internet Explorer 
> separately. So exactly why are we having this discussion any ways, did 
> someone appoint you the mediator of this group.
> 

why are you being such a piss head!!!!
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |

Gmane