headers
" | 1 May 2006 03:42

Re: Satan and the evil

researchone <at> lorenzocrescini.it wrote:
> The dialogue with you makes me fully aware of the origin and the nature
> of some dreadful phenomena  of the modern mentality:  the
> dissatisfaction, the uncertainty, the rebellion, the intimate
> unhappiness of the contemporary human beings.
> They have lost the deep, metaphysical sense of the existence, the
> meaning of their own life, the hope of any destiny.
> The Light illuminating all the environment has been extinguished, and
> all the men are going on like blind ones, looking for a point of
> orientation and support, getting cross at each other and embracing one
> another as at random.
> 
> Website of the author         www.lorenzocrescini.it/right
> Email                                  ricercapap <at> lorenzocrescini.it
> 

That was written using a random word generator, wasn't it?

--

-- 
People who say they understand you - will lie about other things too...
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
gato2005_cl | 1 May 2006 05:21
Picon

Re: Help! Installing Seamonkey 1.0.1 messed up system - even for re-installied Moz. 1.7.12

Incompatible extensions

> 
>     <broadcaster id="Communicator:Workmode"
>   --^
>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
gato2005_cl | 1 May 2006 06:26
Picon

Re: Help on Migration , moving data : Reformatted machine : Old mail directories backed up :

You backup the entire specific S.O "aplication data/mozilla/profiles"?
Just only restore the entire folder with their subfolden that contain 
the profiles.

The profile folder have to use path like
"aplication data/mozilla/profiles/profilename/cqwcsdrew.slt", where the 
slt is the root path to the profile specific containin the files, chache 
directory, etc.

If you compress by profile, restore all to the specific S.O "aplication 
data/mozilla/profiles/nameprofile/sltfolderuncompressed" one by one
More easy no.

I think  the M1.7 have relative path for the profile

moz.20.victim123 <at> dfgh.net escribió:
> Since my earlier post
> 
> I was told that one way of migrating is to
> 
> - create all profiles manually in the newly installed mozilla
> - locate the old profile backups (having mail etc. - mainly mail)
> - copy them on to new profile directories
> 
> I haven't yet done that hoping that an easier way exists
> 
> Thanks in advance
> regards
> Vinayak
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
PeEmm | 1 May 2006 07:53
Picon
Picon

Re: [OT] Re: Firefox 1.5.0.2 Dosen't open pages.

Jay Garcia wrote:
> On 29.04.2006 16:21, PeEmm wrote:
> 
>  --- Original Message ---
> 
> 
>>gwtc wrote:
>>
>>>JanWillem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
>>>>>I've been hanging around secnews/mozilla.org for approximately ten 
>>>>>years.  Unless there was something done totally off any public map, 
>>>>>there has been one person (the aforementioned) banned in all those 
>>>>>years.
>>>>>
>>>>>There were, however, some hellacious (TID) flame wars in those years 
>>>>>long passed.  And only one Champ who remained totally above the fray.
>>>>>
>>>>>Rinaldi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>There were flaming wars, nurtured by some so called Champions. Messages
>>>>were removed to their (Champions') whim or whenever it was to their 
>>>>own advantage.
>>>>
>>>>The only Champ in NTMM, who behaved as a Champ should, was John
>>>>McWilliams: he applied the news group etiquette rules not only to the
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 33 comments |
headers
Matt Nordhoff | 1 May 2006 07:59
Picon

Re: Satan and the evil

On 04/30/06 21:42, none wrote:
> That was written using a random word generator, wasn't it?

I don't think so. The sentences and the whole post are coherent.
--

-- 
Matt Nordhoff
(aka Peng on IRC & the forums)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Matt Nordhoff | 1 May 2006 07:58
Picon

Re: Satan and the evil

On 04/30/06 04:15, researchone <at> lorenzocrescini.it wrote:
> The Light illuminating all the environment has been extinguished ...

Oh, it's only 9-20%, depending on where you live, and it's helping 
mitigate global warming.
--

-- 
Matt Nordhoff
(aka Peng on IRC & the forums)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Matt Nordhoff | 1 May 2006 07:56
Picon

[OTOT] Re: [OT] Re: Firefox 1.5.0.2 Dosen't open pages.

On 04/30/06 03:33, gwtc wrote:
> -- 
> How to Get a Life
> Difficulty Level: Hard
> Tip #4: Eat something other than taco chips 

Hey, I had Pringles Cheezums, too! And those taco chips are really good, 
and I only started eating them yesterday. :-(
--

-- 
Matt Nordhoff
(aka Peng on IRC & the forums)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
gwtc | 1 May 2006 08:22

Re: [OT] Re: Firefox 1.5.0.2 Dosen't open pages.

PeEmm wrote:

> It should be my decision as a reader to decide if a thread turns towards 
> a dead end. I don't need Chris to decide this for me.
> 
you've got my vote on that

--

-- 
How to Get a Life
Difficulty Level: Hard
Tip #4: Eat something other than taco chips
Permalink | Reply | 31 comments |
headers
Jay Garcia | 2 May 2006 02:12

Re: [OT] Re: Firefox 1.5.0.2 Dosen't open pages.

On 01.05.2006 00:53, PeEmm wrote:

 --- Original Message ---

> You never know beforehand where OT threads are going to land. When you 
> skim through the posts, you either give it up and move on to another 
> thread or think it might turn constructive again, so read on.

Actually, a true [OT] really does have some relationship to the on-topic
material but has nothing to do with the actual requested support as such.

> It should be my decision as a reader to decide if a thread turns towards 
> a dead end. I don't need Chris to decide this for me.

"Your decision" ? Yes and a certain degree of responsibility goes along
with the territory of creating and/or perpetuating an [OT] discussion.
Chris steps in when nobody takes that responsibility, IMHO.

> Of course a news group could be so invaded by pointless posts, so there 
> is a real problem finding anything useful. However, that was never the 
> case at secnews.

> Anyway, it's been a while, so it's about time to *end* the boycott :-)

Whewww. :-)

--

-- 
Jay Garcia Netscape/Mozilla Champion
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Chris Ilias | 2 May 2006 02:55
Picon
Favicon

Re: OT Re: Why won't it stop?

_gwtc_ spoke thusly on 30/04/2006 4:35 PM:
> a bit of sarcastic remmarks:  I'm surprised that Chris hasn't been here 
> and told everyone that all this is off topic and where they can take 
> it.

I was playing a wedding in Windsor on the weekend; but here you go...

TO EVERYONE:
If you can't take this discussion to a forum where it is on topic, then 
please move it to mozilla.general. Thanks. :-)

>  Oh, heavens forbid that he should tell a fellow Moz Champion what 
> to do.

Sure I have. Here are a few instances:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.firefox/msg/f94c651ad1483004
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.thunderbird/msg/cbfd5a98fb40b8dc
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.thunderbird/msg/14da960276c68181

You even replied to that last one, so I /know/ you read that one.

> This was already pointed out but he never did respond to it, because he 
> knows its true, oh its very true:
> news://news.mozilla.org:119/VrOdnafBnYb1WtHZnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d <at> mozilla.org
> or
> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/msg/ec7efe0b01c7e1f0

I addressed that here:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/browse_frm/thread/0854cad61a121e55/238f7ba0542ca411?tvc=1#238f7ba0542ca411
"Some people like to take discussions off topic, while others just take
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane