This project is intended to try and implement as much of WML (Wireless Markup Language) as possible in Mozilla/Firefox.

headers david jeanneteau | 18 Mar 2007 22:49

_______________________________________________
Wmlbrowser mailing list
Wmlbrowser <at> mozdev.org
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/wmlbrowser

_______________________________________________
Wmlbrowser mailing list
Wmlbrowser <at> mozdev.org
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/wmlbrowser

david jeanneteau wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm about to use wmlbrowser to add WML support for httpunit.
> Is it allowed to use your source code for httpunit project ?
> 
> What mention (on wmlbrowser) should be included in httpunit ?

Broadly speaking you should be meeting the conditions in the Mozilla 
triple license (Mozilla public license, GPL, or LGPL).

Personally speaking I would like to see credit given to the developers, 
and any improvements fed back into the wmlbrowser project.

Incidentally, could you explain a little more how wmlbrowser will be 
used in httpunit?

Matthew

Jorge m. silva wrote:
> is possible emulate this site ?
> http://wap.bradesco.com.br/
> https://www.wap2.bradesco.com.br/wap2/Login.do

This seems to be an XHTML Mobile site. wmlbrowser is only intended to 
emulate WML. I don't intend to support XHTML Mobile in wmlbrowser.

Matthew

On 3/20/07, Matthew Wilson <matthew <at> mjwilson.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> david jeanneteau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm about to use wmlbrowser to add WML support for httpunit.
> > Is it allowed to use your source code for httpunit project ?
> >
> > What mention (on wmlbrowser) should be included in httpunit ?
>
> Broadly speaking you should be meeting the conditions in the Mozilla
> triple license (Mozilla public license, GPL, or LGPL).

Just to remind the home page of httpunit and its license :
http://httpunit.sourceforge.net/doc/license.html . It seems that there
will be some sort of license incompatibility: wmlbrowser is
tri-licensed like Firefox (Mozilla Public License, GPL, LGPL, pick all
or the one you wish, your choice)  but the license of httpunit seems
too permissive (in my understanding nothing prevents a proprietary
fork). In this particular case seems that your permission is
necessary, but since httpunit is an open-source project, I dare to
hope that this won't be a big problem.

Apart from that, I fully support the idea of Babelzilla :
http://www.babelzilla.org/ and I'm waiting for the next release ;)

_______________________________________________
Wmlbrowser mailing list
Wmlbrowser <at> mozdev.org
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/wmlbrowser

Stegozor wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Matthew Wilson <matthew <at> mjwilson.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> david jeanneteau wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm about to use wmlbrowser to add WML support for httpunit.
>>> Is it allowed to use your source code for httpunit project ?
>>>
>>> What mention (on wmlbrowser) should be included in httpunit ?
>> Broadly speaking you should be meeting the conditions in the Mozilla
>> triple license (Mozilla public license, GPL, or LGPL).
> 
> Just to remind the home page of httpunit and its license :
> http://httpunit.sourceforge.net/doc/license.html . It seems that there
> will be some sort of license incompatibility: wmlbrowser is
> tri-licensed like Firefox (Mozilla Public License, GPL, LGPL, pick all
> or the one you wish, your choice)  but the license of httpunit seems
> too permissive (in my understanding nothing prevents a proprietary
> fork). In this particular case seems that your permission is
> necessary, but since httpunit is an open-source project, I dare to
> hope that this won't be a big problem.

I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think that MPL etc. prevent a proprietary 
fork either, just that the source code has to be made available.

It's important to remember that there are other contributors however, 
the basis of wmlbrowser wasn't written by me.

> Apart from that, I fully support the idea of Babelzilla :
> http://www.babelzilla.org/ and I'm waiting for the next release ;)

I don't have anything significant at the moment I'm afraid. I did have 
some ideas for making multi-card navigation work but they didn't come to 
anything.

Matthew

david jeanneteau wrote:
> 
>     Incidentally, could you explain a little more how wmlbrowser will be
>     used in httpunit? 
> 
> 
> Very simple: I got  wml.xsl, wml.js and wml.css from wmlbrowser source.
> 
> In httpunit:
> - detect a wml file
> - apply the xsl transformation on wml content

So is the purpose to test WML pages? or wmlbrowser?

> I made some changes in wml.xsl:
> - the chrome:// urls were replaced by http://localhost:port ones 
> (wml.css and wml.js)
> - in wml.js, one line could not be interpreted by httpunit javascript 
> engine: it is commented out
> 
> I had some contact on htmlunit project, and i'm about to turn to this 
> project (httpunit seems to be in 'sleeping' state).

David, I don't think you've joined the mailing list. Your messages would 
get through more quickly if you did. Also I don't know whether you've 
caught the recent messages about licenses.

Matthew

Hi,

Please compare

http://wap1.wapedia.mobi/en/Special:Prefsmobile?nocache=w4601e3508543e&prefsdo=1
(wml) and

http://wap2.wapedia.mobi/en/Special:Prefsmobile?nocache=w4601e299974f0&prefsdo=1
(xhtml).

Seems that there's a problem with the menus in wmlbrowser. Is this a known bug?

Stegozor wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please compare
> 
> http://wap1.wapedia.mobi/en/Special:Prefsmobile?nocache=w4601e3508543e&prefsdo=1
> (wml) and
> 
> http://wap2.wapedia.mobi/en/Special:Prefsmobile?nocache=w4601e299974f0&prefsdo=1
> (xhtml).
> 
> Seems that there's a problem with the menus in wmlbrowser. Is this a known bug?

Note that you need to access http://wap1.wapedia.mobi/en/ or 
http://wap2.wapedia.mobi/en/ first.

It looks like a fault with the page to be honest, unless I'm missing 
something.

Matthew

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

1	January 2012
1	October 2011
6	June 2011
4	April 2011
2	January 2011
1	December 2010
2	November 2010
2	August 2010
1	July 2010
2	June 2010
5	April 2010
6	March 2010
4	February 2010
1	December 2009
2	October 2009
1	August 2009
3	July 2009
12	May 2009
2	January 2009
6	December 2008
4	November 2008
2	September 2008
1	August 2008
2	July 2008
1	May 2008
1	April 2008
6	March 2008
4	February 2008
3	January 2008
6	December 2007
1	November 2007
4	October 2007
8	September 2007
1	August 2007
7	July 2007
3	June 2007
5	May 2007
10	April 2007
22	March 2007
4	January 2007
11	December 2006
10	November 2006
8	October 2006
2	September 2006
5	August 2006
8	July 2006
7	May 2006
1	April 2006
11	March 2006
15	February 2006
16	January 2006
9	December 2005
10	November 2005
4	September 2005
4	July 2005
2	June 2005
2	May 2005

WML support for httpunit

is possible emulate this site ?

Re: WML support for httpunit

Re: is possible emulate this site ?

Re: WML support for httpunit

Re: WML support for httpunit

Re: WML support for httpunit

Re: WML support for httpunit

A possible bug?

Re: A possible bug?