Re: Helo me!

> I need a code, using Lua5.1.2 that allows me to load a Lua file and  
> print the name of all the functions that have the document. Please  
> any people that have an example or tutorial send It to me because I  
> have not been able to make an example that loads lua and execute it  
> correctly using the latest libraries.

This is phenomenally off topic.  Enigmail has nothing to do  
whatsoever with Lua or basic Lua programming questions.

--
Robert J. Hansen <rjh <at> sixdemonbag.org>

"Most people are never thought about after they're gone.  'I wonder
where Rob got the plutonium?' is better than most get." -- Phil Munson

Re: [Fwd: 160-bit hash required for Enigmail?]

> In your OpenPGP preferences under PGP/MIME there You can choose which
> hash algorithm to use.  For most SHA1 is the algorithm of choice since
> many do not have SHA256 SHA384 or SHA512 compiled into their kernel.  As
> more upgrade their systems then using hashes like SHA512 will become
> popular.

According to http://hp.kairaven.de/pgp/gpg/gpganhang2.html the hash
algorithms are part of GnuPG itself and not of the kernel. That's also
what I thought in the past. If it was not in gpg this would mean it had
to be in the kernels of Windows, OS X, BSD etc. which all be able to run
gpg on. Is that the case?

Greets
Alex

--

-- 
***** http://www.lespocky.de *******************************************
"Der Mensch, der bereit ist, seine Freiheit aufzugeben um Sicherheit zu
gewinnen, wird beides verlieren."                  /Benjamin Franklin/

_______________________________________________
Enigmail mailing list
Enigmail <at> mozdev.org
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/enigmail

Re: [Fwd: 160-bit hash required for Enigmail?]

> According to http://hp.kairaven.de/pgp/gpg/gpganhang2.html the hash
> algorithms are part of GnuPG itself and not of the kernel.

The hash algorithms are, without any shadow of a doubt, part of GnuPG  
and not the kernel.

GnuPG uses its own crypto code, regardless of any cryptographic  
functionality provided by the OS in question.  (With a minor  
exception made for /dev/urandom and CryptGenRand, on UNIX and Win32,  
respectively.)

--
Robert J. Hansen <rjh <at> sixdemonbag.org>

"Most people are never thought about after they're gone.  'I wonder
where Rob got the plutonium?' is better than most get." -- Phil Munson

Re: New enigmail OS/2 maintainer

Walter Meinl wrote:
> Hi all,
> our long time OS/2 maintainer for enigmail isn't available anymore.
> However, according to the posts in the mozilla.dev.ports.os2 newsgroup
> people are still very interested in getting up-to-date enigmail
> builds. I build versions 0.95.0 and 0.95.1 successfully and Steve Wend
> is hosting them now at http://www.os2bbs.com/os2news/Warpzilla.html
> However, we'd really appreciate it very much, if we could contribute
> them officially. And it would be necessary to get some OS/2 related
> smaller patches (platform and so on) into your tree. When it's also
> interesting for you, I'd like to open a bug about it.
> Thanks for your good work Walter

We can certainly provide them officially. Please open a bug, and attach
the required patches!

-Patrick

[ANN] Enigmail v0.95.2 available

I have released Enigmail v0.95.2 for Thunderbird 2.0 and Seamonkey 1.1

Changes

This release contains a fixed Spanish (es-ES) language pack and adds the
Czech language pack.

Obtaining Enigmail

Enigmail can be downloaded from <http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download.html>
The changelog is available from <http://enigmail.mozdev.org/changelog.html>

Re: [Fwd: 160-bit hash required for Enigmail?]

John W. Moore III wrote:
> LeRoy Cressy wrote:
> 
>> In your OpenPGP preferences under PGP/MIME there You can choose which
>> hash algorithm to use.  For most SHA1 is the algorithm of choice since
>> many do not have SHA256 SHA384 or SHA512 compiled into their kernel.  As
>> more upgrade their systems then using hashes like SHA512 will become
>> popular.
> 
> This depends upon which version of Enigmail is being used.  The Hash
> selection feature has been removed from Enigmail is versions 0.95 and
> above.  The Hash is either selected within gpg.conf or by the prefs Set
> on the Key.

To emphasize on this, the hash selection feature is still there, but no
longer used by default. I.e. if the algorithm was not "default" in
v0.94.x, then the algorithm will still be used as specified in a now
hidden preference. To use the "default", i.e. let gpg choose, make sure
that the option "extensions.enigmail.mimeHashAlgorithm" is set to 0

-Patrick

Enigmail 0.94.4 signature bad / different files on 2 servers

Hi!

The signature ("enigmail-0.94.4-win+lin+mac.xpi.asc")
for v0.94.4 does not work when downloading from here:
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download.html

For details see below.
OT note: Why are "v0.94.4" and "v0.95.2" not mentioned on http://enigmail.mozdev.org/news.html?

====

1. "v0.94.4"
There are 2 files with different names that have different contents.
A single signature file is provided, which obviously cannot work for both:
It works only for one file.

Link named "v0.94.4-win+lin+mac.xpi" points to
"https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/downloads/file/16973/enigmail-0.94.4-tb+sm.xpi"
(b) The downloaded file is different from
"http://www.mozilla-enigmail.org/downloads/enigmail-0.94.4-win+lin+mac.xpi"
(there is a small change in "install.rdf")

Link named "Signature File" points to
"http://www.mozilla-enigmail.org/downloads/enigmail-0.94.4-win+lin+mac.xpi.asc"
"enigmail-0.94.4-win+lin+mac.xpi.asc" is a "good" signature file for
"enigmail-0.94.4-win+lin+mac.xpi".

So, because of (b) this signature file is not ok if applied to "enigmail-0.94.4-tb+sm.xpi".

Re: Enigmail 0.94.4 signature bad / different files on 2 servers

Hendrik Tessendorf wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The signature ("enigmail-0.94.4-win+lin+mac.xpi.asc")
> for v0.94.4 does not work when downloading from here:
> http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download.html
> 
> For details see below.
> OT note: Why are "v0.94.4" and "v0.95.2" not mentioned on http://enigmail.mozdev.org/news.html?

Because I forgot to update the web page -- thanks for noticing.

> 1. "v0.94.4"
> There are 2 files with different names that have different contents.
> A single signature file is provided, which obviously cannot work for both:
> It works only for one file.

Right, again my fault ;-( I forgot to update the file and signature on
www.mozilla-enigmail.org after the version was released on
addons.mozilla.org (see below)

[...]

> (1.) is bad. Looks like the "mirrors" are out of sync. Please fix this.

done

> (2.) is ok for me, it is just not convenient
>      (e.g., it does not work like said under "Signature Checking")

secret key needed?

i received an e-mail from a friend, indicated by (from) and he sent this
same e-mail to 3 others.  So the to: field has my name plus 3 others
total 4 recipients.
indicated by (to1, to2, to3, to4).  only to3 and to4 where explicitly
mentioned in the log below:

I'm getting the error: decryption failed: secret key not available

Why is it stating that i need a secret key?  Who's secret key is not
available?

enigmail> C:\Program Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe --charset utf8  --batch
--no-tty --
status-fd 2 -d --passphrase-fd 0 --no-use-agent
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID DFFF3B09, created 2007-05-09
      "from <removed>"
gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID FA8BBCCA
gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID 5EAE6877
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID E036B63B, created 2007-03-15
      "to3 <removed>"
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID EB690C8B, created 2007-05-07
      "to4 <removed>"
gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
enigmail.js: Enigmail.decryptMessageEnd: Error in command execution

-Christopher

Re: secret key needed?

i also want to mention that i only get this problem with this one
sender.  normally the ID's listed are ones that i see in my Key
Management window.  But in this case i don't.

Christopher M. Logan wrote:
> i received an e-mail from a friend, indicated by (from) and he sent this
> same e-mail to 3 others.  So the to: field has my name plus 3 others
> total 4 recipients.
> indicated by (to1, to2, to3, to4).  only to3 and to4 where explicitly
> mentioned in the log below:
> 
> I'm getting the error: decryption failed: secret key not available
> 
> Why is it stating that i need a secret key?  Who's secret key is not
> available?
> 
> 
> enigmail> C:\Program Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe --charset utf8  --batch
> --no-tty --
> status-fd 2 -d --passphrase-fd 0 --no-use-agent
> gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID DFFF3B09, created 2007-05-09
>       "from <removed>"
> gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID FA8BBCCA
> gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID 5EAE6877
> gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID E036B63B, created 2007-03-15
>       "to3 <removed>"
> gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID EB690C8B, created 2007-05-07
>       "to4 <removed>"
> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
> enigmail.js: Enigmail.decryptMessageEnd: Error in command execution