headers
Chris I | 3 Nov 2003 09:55
Picon
Favicon

Re: Replacing XUL file within comm.jar

Will Levine spoke thusly:
> Chris I wrote:
> 
>>Many Netscape 7.1 users have complained about "Open link in new window"
>>being before "Open link in new tab" in the link context menu. This can
>>be changed via editing the file
>>\content\communicator\contentAreaContextOverlay.xul in comm.jar.
>>
>>I would like to make an XPI that will replace that file with the new
>>one. There was nothing added to the file, nothing subtracted. I just
>>switched the order of those two entries.
>>
>>How should I go about this? Is it possible to replace a file within
>>comm.jar via XPI? Can I create a separate JAR file that will override
>>that one overlay file? I definitely want to install it
>>'installation-wide' rather than per profile.
> 
> I think the preferred way to do this would be to use JavaScript to move
> the elements around instead of replacing whole files.  Maybe something
> like (I haven't tested this)
> 
> newwindow = document.getElementById("context-openlink");
> newtab = document.getElementById("context-openlinkintab");
> 
> document.documentElement.insertBefore("newtab", "newwindow");

Would this be added to the install.js, or as a separate js file?
--

-- 
solon <at> ilias.ca - Mozilla Champion
Netscape Links <http://ilias.ca>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jbilou Afif AL-Mutawa | 6 Nov 2003 22:48

Re: grassroots anti-brand

On 6 Nov 2003 21:48:55 GMT, Kaye <at> uhystope.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ziad Fahd al Megrahi | 6 Nov 2003 21:21

Re: our children's lives

On 6 Nov 2003 20:21:05 GMT, Norma <at> exawl.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Basksh Ziad Bin Hasher | 6 Nov 2003 21:58

Re: quick judo-like move

On 6 Nov 2003 20:58:12 GMT, Marla <at> iwevta.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ahmed Sherzai | 6 Nov 2003 23:40

Re: our children's lives

On 6 Nov 2003 22:40:08 GMT, Jonnie <at> yxaqs.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ziad al Jabbar | 6 Nov 2003 23:27

Re: brand damage

On 6 Nov 2003 22:27:29 GMT, Sarah <at> siwdofar.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Zakariya Al Nami | 6 Nov 2003 21:18

Re: isn't exactly rocket science

On 6 Nov 2003 20:18:54 GMT, Sharon <at> apipzu.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Abduljalil Talal al-Maktoum | 6 Nov 2003 23:26

Re: the shoes we wear

On 6 Nov 2003 22:26:32 GMT, Richard <at> oqaxsigu.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Haron Shah Masoud | 6 Nov 2003 21:54

Re: the unswoosher

On 6 Nov 2003 20:54:13 GMT, Sara <at> vasfyce.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Mhammed Dawood | 7 Nov 2003 00:38

Re: plain simple cheap fair

On 6 Nov 2003 23:38:31 GMT, Dickie <at> yqefni.org wrote:
>
>Rethink the Cool + the Shoe
>
>phil knight had a dream.  he'd sell shoes.  he'd sell dreams.
>he'd get rich.  he'd use sweatshops if he had to.
>
>then along came a new shoe.  plain.  simple.  cheap.  fair.
>designed for only one thing:  kicking phil's ass.
>
>the unswoosher
>
>$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
>For years, Nike was the undisputed champion of logo culture, 
>its swoosh an instant symbol of global cool. 
>
>Today, Phil Knight's Nike is a fading empire, badly hurt by 
>years of "brand damage" as activists and culture jammers 
>fought back against mindfuck marketing and dirty sweatshop labor.
>
>Now a final challenge. We take on Phil at his own game - and win. 
>We turn the shoes we wear into a counterbranding game. The swoosh 
>versus the anti-swoosh. Which side are you on?
>
>Adbusters has been doing R&D for more than a year, and guess what? 
>Making a shoe - a good shoe - isn't exactly rocket science. 
>With a network of supporters, we're getting ready to launch the 
>blackSpot sneaker, the world's first grassroots anti-brand. 
>You can help launch the blackSpot revolution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane