8 May 2007 16:35
Re: [pyxpcom] PyXPCOM viability and OLPC
Ian Bicking <ianb <at> colorstudy.com>
2007-05-08 14:35:21 GMT
2007-05-08 14:35:21 GMT
edward baafi wrote: > This is interesting.. I use PyXpcom along with Xulrunner and currently > have a B2 XO for development.. Well then, this may be leading in an obvious direction... > In terms of a stripped down Firefox vs. PyXPCOM, I don't see why this > would be an either/or as Firefox can be built with PyXPCOM support.. > Of course you need a stripped down browser in terms of memory > footprint (the B2 only has 128MB of ram and the production version > should have 256) and you need to add extra functionality and tie it in > as a "Sugar Activity" so you should of course use python.. > > So you can build a stripped down Firefox with PyXpcom support and add > features and tie into sugar with python, or you can build a Xulrunner > based browser from scratch with PyXpcom support.. Actually these > aren't too different as Firefox 3 was supposed to just be an app > running on top of Xulrunner although this feature shows up as "At > Risk" in the Firefox3 features list: > http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3/Product_Requirements_Document#Gecko.2FPlatform > > > Given that there isn't much to the current "Web Browser Activity" on > the XO, I would think that you could build a Xulrunner based version > of that pretty quickly and then add features as needed (using PyXpcom > if you like) rather than starting with all the features of Firefox and > figuring out where to nip and tuck.. I like the Xulrunner plus > PyXpcom approach as it would allow others to write Xul apps rather > than use py/GTK which is probably too low level for many "Activity" > developers..(Continue reading)
Ken
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: Python binaries for mozilla
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:11:40 +1000
From: Mark Hammond <mhammond <at> skippinet.com.au>
To: <kenneth.m.mcdonald <at> sbcglobal.net>
here you go. Please forward back any worthwhile changes you make!
Cheers,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hammond [mailto:mhammond <at> skippinet.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, 17 June 2006 1:51 PM
To: 'pyxpcom <at> listserv.ActiveState.com'
Subject: Python binaries for mozilla
I've been thinking about and playing with ways to create a Python XPI for
Mozilla. As I've mentioned before, this XPI needs to bundle Python itself
along with the 'pyxpcom' and new 'nsdom' packages. We don't want to rely on
a pre-installed Python (that places too much burden on the end user and too
much scope for error), but at the same time we want to co-exist with any
RSS Feed