This forum is for discussions about Zulu, the standards based calendar client project

Tony Mechelynck | 2 Dec 2011 18:06

Re: Version numbers after Lightning 1.0 (Summary)

On 17/11/11 22:48, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> On 11/17/11 10:21 PM, Stefan Sitter wrote:
>> Philipp Kewisch wrote:
>>> But isn't the "Version" (not Target Milestone) field rather used for
>>> "What version of the product does this bug show up in" ? If we have
>>> Trunk and Lightning 1.3 at the same time, what version would one set for
>>> a bug that happens in the current comm-central?
>>
>> In my opinion "Trunk" should not be used assigned in the future, neither
>> for Version nor Target Milestone. A bug found in comm-central should be
>> set to the currently active version, i.e. "Lightning 1.3" if found today.
>>
>> Currently we have 207 open and 1745 closed calendar bugs that use
>> Version "Trunk". I don't think they should be moved to Version
>> "Lightning 1.3". At least I assume this would happen if you rename the
>> keyword instead of adding a new one.
>>
>> Stefan
> Oh, right!Maybe we can move those bugs out of the way to the correct
> version and then remove the Trunk milestone, otherwise new bugs might be
> wrongly assigned. I'm adding Lightning 1.3 as a new milestone for now.
>
> Philipp

Well, IIUC the idea of setting the Version field to Trunk is that that 
means "The problem happens in current trunk and will happen in all 
future trunk versions until it is fixed". OTOH if a problem is 
discovered in a branch build it may or may not happen also on trunk.

On SeaMonkey (where current trunk is 2.8a1) if I discover a bug in a

(Continue reading)

ComptonAllyson30 | 7 Dec 2011 04:38

Re: DRIVER ...

freelance writer

loan | 12 Dec 2011 07:36

Re: Automated multiple mails to events creation

freelance writer

Tony Mechelynck | 17 Dec 2011 01:23

Provider for Google calendar: XPI versions, AMO vs. comm-central

I'm using the following version of SeaMonkey:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0a1) Gecko/20111216 Firefox/11.0a1 
SeaMonkey/2.8a1
ID:20111216003011

The latest Google Provider version at 
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/provider-for-google-calendar/ 
is 0.9; it supports only Gecko 8 (i.e. Thunderbird 8.0a1 to 8.* or 
SeaMonkey 2.5a1 to 2.5.*)

The latest gdata-provider.xpi from

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-central/linux64-xpi/ 
, dated 2011-12-16 04:21, and which is supposed to support Gecko 11 
(Thunderbird 11.0a1, SeaMonkey 2.8a1) comes as version 0.9pre as defined 
by its install.rdf, a *lower* version than that of the Provider 
applicable to Gecko 8.

I have extensions.strictCompatibility defaulted to false and 
extensions.checkCompatibility.nightly user-set to false in about:config.

Every time I "Check for Updates" in the addons manager, I am presented 
with an "update" to version 0.9 of the Provider for Google Calendar 
extension. Happily, I have addon updates set to Manual (which is not the 
default) via the addon manager UI, so this "update" (which is in fact a 
downgrade IIUC) does not happen spontaneously.

Shouldn't the version of the gdata-provider.xpi builds for Gecko 9 and 
higher _all_ be set (for all branches and platforms) to values higher 
than that of the Gecko 8 build available at AMO (and to monotonously

(Continue reading)

Tony Mechelynck | 17 Dec 2011 13:54

Re: Provider for Google calendar: XPI versions, AMO vs. comm-central

On 17/12/11 01:23, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> I'm using the following version of SeaMonkey:
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0a1) Gecko/20111216 Firefox/11.0a1
> SeaMonkey/2.8a1
> ID:20111216003011
>
> The latest Google Provider version at
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/provider-for-google-calendar/
> is 0.9; it supports only Gecko 8 (i.e. Thunderbird 8.0a1 to 8.* or
> SeaMonkey 2.5a1 to 2.5.*)
>
> The latest gdata-provider.xpi from
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-central/linux64-xpi/
> , dated 2011-12-16 04:21, and which is supposed to support Gecko 11
> (Thunderbird 11.0a1, SeaMonkey 2.8a1) comes as version 0.9pre as defined
> by its install.rdf, a *lower* version than that of the Provider
> applicable to Gecko 8.
>
> I have extensions.strictCompatibility defaulted to false and
> extensions.checkCompatibility.nightly user-set to false in about:config.
>
> Every time I "Check for Updates" in the addons manager, I am presented
> with an "update" to version 0.9 of the Provider for Google Calendar
> extension. Happily, I have addon updates set to Manual (which is not the
> default) via the addon manager UI, so this "update" (which is in fact a
> downgrade IIUC) does not happen spontaneously.
>
> Shouldn't the version of the gdata-provider.xpi builds for Gecko 9 and
> higher _all_ be set (for all branches and platforms) to values higher
> than that of the Gecko 8 build available at AMO (and to monotonously

(Continue reading)

Orion Poplawski | 20 Dec 2011 16:28

TB9 release

Looks like Fedora is building TB9.  Could we get a TB9 compatible 
lightning release ASAP?  Thanks!

--

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion <at> cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

WLS | 20 Dec 2011 16:38

Re: TB9 release

On 12/20/2011 10:28 AM, Orion Poplawski aliandika:
> Looks like Fedora is building TB9.  Could we get a TB9 compatible
> lightning release ASAP?  Thanks!
>

The TB9 compatible Lightning release has been out since TB9 has been in
beta.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions

--

-- 

 Daily | openSUSE 11.4(x86_64) | Gnome 2.32.1 | 1.8GHz CPU | 2GB RAM
 Get openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/121/en
 Firefox Support: http://support.mozilla.com
 Profile Manager: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager

Orion Poplawski | 20 Dec 2011 16:54

Re: TB9 release

On 12/20/2011 08:38 AM, WLS wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 10:28 AM, Orion Poplawski aliandika:
>> Looks like Fedora is building TB9.  Could we get a TB9 compatible
>> lightning release ASAP?  Thanks!
>>
>
> The TB9 compatible Lightning release has been out since TB9 has been in
> beta.
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions
>

Sorry, I should have specified a source tarball.

--

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion <at> cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

Stefan Sitter | 20 Dec 2011 17:36

Re: TB9 release

Orion Poplawski wrote:
> WLS wrote:
>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Looks like Fedora is building TB9. Could we get a TB9 compatible
>>> lightning release ASAP? Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> The TB9 compatible Lightning release has been out since TB9 has been in
>> beta.
>>
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions
>>
>
> Sorry, I should have specified a source tarball.

You could try the following source package and check back once 1.1 is 
officially released: 
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/1.1-candidates/build1/source/

Orion Poplawski | 20 Dec 2011 19:01

Re: TB9 release

On 12/20/2011 09:36 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote:
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> WLS wrote:
>>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>> Looks like Fedora is building TB9. Could we get a TB9 compatible
>>>> lightning release ASAP? Thanks!
>>>>
>>>
>>> The TB9 compatible Lightning release has been out since TB9 has been in
>>> beta.
>>>
>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I should have specified a source tarball.
>
> You could try the following source package and check back once 1.1 is
> officially released:
> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/1.1-candidates/build1/source/

Will do, thanks.  Any ETA on 1.1 final?

--

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion <at> cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

Group

gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.calendar.

Search Archive

Page

1 | 2

Articles in period: 14

December 2011

Language

Change language

Options

Current view: Threads only / Showing only 20 lines / Not hiding cited text.
Change to All messages, whole messages, or hide cited text.

Post a message
NNTP Newsgroup
Classic Gmane web interface
XML

XML

RSS Feed
List Information

About Gmane

Recent entries

Release schedule of Lightning 1.9.2 ? (23 Apr 2013)
Odd Reminder Behavior (11 Apr 2013)
e/s&s como ganhar dinheiro na internet , dinheiro rapido, dinheiro nav (10 Apr 2013)
Status of 1.9.1 (19 Mar 2013)
Status of 1.9.1 (19 Mar 2013)
Status of 1.9.1 (19 Mar 2013)
Google Calendar Caldav support dropped? (14 Mar 2013)
Lightning 2.4a1 missing Check boxes for Calendars (10 Mar 2013)
Lightning nightly for Thunderbird daily version 22.0a1 - No auto-updat (20 Feb 2013)
Lightning 2.1b1 on amo without translations (20 Feb 2013)
Lightning 1.9.1 Release Candidate available for testing (18 Feb 2013)
calendar/lightning bug reports (12 Feb 2013)
How to "Invite Attendees" using an Address Book "List"? (4 Feb 2013)
Fwd: [Bug 784193] Thunderbird leaks threads (1 Feb 2013)
Fwd: [Bug 784193] Thunderbird leaks threads (31 Jan 2013)
All my users are asked for UN & PW (29 Jan 2013)
Input TAB in event description (29 Jan 2013)
Thunderbird & Lightning keep asking for Passwords (24 Jan 2013)
Organizer's participation status (19 Jan 2013)
Organizer's participation status (19 Jan 2013)
Organizer's participation status (19 Jan 2013)

Archives

14	April 2013
29	March 2013
32	February 2013
37	January 2013
19	December 2012
22	November 2012
23	October 2012
14	September 2012
2	August 2012
18	July 2012
51	June 2012
22	May 2012
7	April 2012
18	March 2012
35	February 2012
35	January 2012
14	December 2011
77	November 2011
38	October 2011
85	September 2011
26	August 2011
27	July 2011
13	June 2011
27	May 2011
18	April 2011
31	March 2011
15	February 2011
16	January 2011
23	December 2010
24	November 2010
24	October 2010
21	September 2010
36	August 2010
44	July 2010
20	June 2010
35	May 2010
41	April 2010
19	March 2010
58	February 2010
48	January 2010
60	December 2009
65	November 2009
49	October 2009
64	September 2009
19	August 2009
30	July 2009
32	June 2009
24	May 2009
66	April 2009
69	March 2009
103	February 2009
76	January 2009
82	December 2008
53	November 2008
96	October 2008
137	September 2008
81	August 2008
81	July 2008
83	June 2008
87	May 2008
156	April 2008
179	March 2008
85	February 2008
86	January 2008
82	December 2007
83	November 2007
174	October 2007
66	September 2007
98	August 2007
55	July 2007
139	June 2007
87	May 2007
106	April 2007
91	March 2007
64	February 2007
85	January 2007
104	December 2006
214	November 2006
211	October 2006
79	September 2006
108	August 2006
116	July 2006
98	June 2006
271	May 2006
271	April 2006
101	March 2006
76	January 2006
193	December 2005
156	November 2005
213	October 2005
284	September 2005
284	August 2005
157	July 2005
144	June 2005
209	May 2005
303	April 2005
433	March 2005
450	February 2005
375	January 2005
397	December 2004
350	November 2004
330	October 2004
584	September 2004
499	August 2004
322	July 2004
342	June 2004
288	May 2004
182	April 2004
204	March 2004
250	February 2004
277	January 2004
201	December 2003
396	November 2003
246	October 2003
248	September 2003
212	August 2003
267	July 2003
229	June 2003
149	May 2003
261	April 2003
271	March 2003
256	February 2003
143	January 2003
82	December 2002
145	November 2002
119	October 2002
261	September 2002
251	August 2002
177	July 2002
61	June 2002
49	May 2002
88	April 2002
3	February 2002

Design

Zawodny | Right Menu | Left Menu

Your Own Design

Paste the URL of your CSS below. Download CSS template