1 Jul 2007 03:22
Re: Re: TeX (was: Re: Re: Re: styler.GetPropertyIntand keywordlists)
instanton <soft_share <at> 126.com>
2007-07-01 01:22:23 GMT
2007-07-01 01:22:23 GMT
Hans, > indeed, and the config files contain keywords for the core languages > (tex, pdftex, etex omega etc) > context ships wih a bunch of keyword defs (one for each user interface > language) > since i use no other macro packages i have no other lists Yes, I knew that most of the lists were for ConTeXt. But I don't understand the use of these lists or what are the gains of using these lists comparing to not using them -- I tested with some ConTeXt sources and it seems that the ColouriseTeXDoc works OK without setting %interface=en, nl, de etc. As I mentioned in the original message, users often define their own commands and structures, and these might not be in the lists, so might not get coloured if some of the interfaces is turned on; >> So >> I'm wondering if you would accept the idea of replacing >> ColouriseTeXDoc code >> in LexTeX.cxx with something similar to ColoriseLaTeXDoc from >> LexOthers.cxx. > latex is just a macro package and the lexer is independent of the macro > package; toe original lexer was flawed and not tex compliant; the > current lexer is more configurable > scite if the reference editor for editing support in context (a tex > macro package) and its users now expect these the tex/mplexers to be > there -)(Continue reading)
RSS Feed