headers
Ronald Garcia | 14 Sep 22:54
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Review wizard's report for October 2007

============================================
Review Wizard Status Report for October 2007
============================================

News
====

August 17, 2007 -- Time Series Accepted.
Announcement: http://lists.boost.org/boost-announce/2007/08/0142.php

July 24, 2007 -- Boost Version 1.34.1 Released.
This is a bug fix release addressing many problems with the 1.34.0  
release.
Announcement: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/query? 
status=closed&milestone=Boost+1.34.1

We need experienced review managers.  Please take a look at the list
of libraries in need of managers and check out their descriptions.  In
general review managers are active boost participants or library
contributors.  If you can serve as review manager for any of them,
email Ron Garcia or John Phillips, "garcia at cs dot indiana dot edu"
and "jphillip at capital dot edu" respectively.

A link to this report will be posted to www.boost.org.
If you would like us to make any modifications or additions to this
report before we do that, please email Ron or John.

If you're library author and plan on submitting a library for review
in the next 3-6 months, send Ron or John a short description of your
library and we'll add it to the Libraries Under Construction below.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Tobias Schwinger | 27 Sep 23:43
Favicon

[review] Review of Exception begins today

The formal review of the Exception library, proposed by Emil Dotchevski,
begins today.

The library provides an exception class that can transport arbitrary
values, thus freeing the user from designing custom exception classes.

The library can be downloaded at

     http://tinyurl.com/24wtwu

and its documentation can be read online at

     http://tinyurl.com/2bkojl

.

What to include in Review Comments
==================================

Your comments may be brief or lengthy, but basically the Review Manager
needs your evaluation of the library.  If you identify problems along
the way, please note if they are minor, serious, or showstoppers.

Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

     * What is your evaluation of the design?
     * What is your evaluation of the implementation?
     * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
     * What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness
       of the library?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane