1 Nov 19:18
Re: Why the emphasis on graphics?
mite110011 <mite51 <at> hotmail.com>
2004-11-01 18:18:31 GMT
2004-11-01 18:18:31 GMT
--- In xaml-talk <at> yahoogroups.com, "marc_clifton2000" <cliftonm <at> k...> wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > > Now if its good for asolutely anything you can put into an API is > > another question. > > This is very true. I'm certainly not an advocate to put everything > into a declarative implementation, but I am trying to champion the > cause that Microsoft and third party vendors at least write their > classes so that they are declarative-friendly. Microsoft has done > an excellent job with the .NET classes, sadly, third party > toolmakers do some really bizarre things. One needs to only look at > their code serialized from their designers to see what a mess some > of their classes are. Can you provied a specific example? > > XAML is really mean to expose a system to non- > > technical people so they can build and tweak things within that > > system. > > I think this is treading on the realm of contradiction. Tweaking > xml isn't easy--it looks like gibberish to a non-technical person. > Would a non-technical person know how to edit a vector path(Continue reading)
RSS Feed