7 Jun 2007 19:50
8 Jun 2007 00:11
Documentation page and the test site
I was given an account to the squeak.org website in order to maintain the http://squeak.org/Documentation/ page. I also recently used my account to link to the Mailing list page on the Swiki, which I recently re-vamped (http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/608). But I also see there is a http://wwwtest.squeak.org site. Should I be making changes there and letting the webteam port them over? I am not familiar with the policy. -- -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808
8 Jun 2007 01:14
Re: Documentation page and the test site
We usually make changes to the wwwtest site first. Get everyone's approval before moving it over to the real site. Matthew Fulmer wrote: > I was given an account to the squeak.org website in order to > maintain the http://squeak.org/Documentation/ page. I also > recently used my account to link to the Mailing list page on the > Swiki, which I recently re-vamped > (http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/608). But I also see there is a > http://wwwtest.squeak.org site. Should I be making changes there > and letting the webteam port them over? I am not familiar with > the policy. > > -- -- brad fuller www.bradfuller.com +1 (408) 799-6124
8 Jun 2007 01:30
Re: Documentation page and the test site
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:14:48PM -0700, Brad Fuller wrote: > We usually make changes to the wwwtest site first. Get everyone's > approval before moving it over to the real site. Ok. I will revert and announce my changes as soon as possible. Sorry. > Matthew Fulmer wrote: > > I was given an account to the squeak.org website in order to > > maintain the http://squeak.org/Documentation/ page. I also > > recently used my account to link to the Mailing list page on the > > Swiki, which I recently re-vamped > > (http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/608). But I also see there is a > > http://wwwtest.squeak.org site. Should I be making changes there > > and letting the webteam port them over? I am not familiar with > > the policy. -- -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808
8 Jun 2007 02:12
Re: Documentation page and the test site
Matthew Fulmer wrote:
But, that's our "usual" process.
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:14:48PM -0700, Brad Fuller wrote:It's by no means and hard and fast rule. I'd say it's up to you if you want us to review it.We usually make changes to the wwwtest site first. Get everyone's approval before moving it over to the real site.Ok. I will revert and announce my changes as soon as possible. Sorry.
But, that's our "usual" process.
8 Jun 2007 02:32
Community page > Mailing List
I replaced the Squeak mailing list page on the Swiki with a list of the most popular Squeak list, along with their mirrors on gmane and nabble: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/608 I also replaced a few links on the community page, under the Mailing List header, on wwwtest.squeak.org. Comments on both the Swiki change and the website change are welcome. -- -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808
8 Jun 2007 02:57
Documentation page update
I am considering doing a large overhaul on the documentation page on wwwtest.squeak.org. I started by fixing the broken links on the wwwtest site which had already been fixed on the main page. I think that the Documentation page should link to the best documentation at the top, and only later point the user at the heap of out-of-date stuff. So I put links to Squeak by Example and my tutorial list at the top in nice-looking <h2> headers, and removed the Tutorials section, as my tutorial list is much better (imho). However, That is only two links on the rather large page, and they do not seem eye-catching at all. I am no web designer, so I am not sure how to fix this. Also, are there other docs we could put there that are not slightly embarrassing to show noobs? Two things that are especially nice from my collection [1] are Maarten Maartensz's Squeak pages : http://www.maartensz.org/computing/squeak/squeak_index.htm and Stephane Ducasse's Smalltalk Exercises: http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/Teaching/CoursAnnecy/0506-M1-OOP/OOPAvance.pdf Please help. [1]: My collection of Squeak stuff; most are useful: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5871 PS. I am not sure whether to cross-post this message to the doc-team list, so I did not. I am not sure if there is or should be a definable separation of duties between the two team's goals -- -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808
8 Jun 2007 03:10
Re: Community page > Mailing List
Matthew Fulmer wrote: > I replaced the Squeak mailing list page on the Swiki with a list > of the most popular Squeak list, along with their mirrors on > gmane and nabble: > http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/608 > > I also replaced a few links on the community page, under the > Mailing List header, on wwwtest.squeak.org. Comments on both the > Swiki change and the website change are welcome. > Thanks for doing this Matthew! I propose to have only one place that lists all mailing lists - either on the wiki or on the squeak site, but not both. The other page can point to it and can even reference a few of the major mailing lists to help the reader understand what they are. This both helps confusion to the visitor and helps maintenance issues when lists are added, deleted or changed. -- -- brad fuller www.bradfuller.com +1 (408) 799-6124
8 Jun 2007 03:22
Web team, Doc team, and Swiki cleanup
Cross-posted to both the web team list and the doc-team list. Sorry. In the postscript to my last message to the web team, an old uncertainty I have had for a while crept up. What is (or should be) the separate duties of the web and doc teams? By my understanding, the Web team is solely responsible for the maintenance of the www.squeak.org site. I started the Doc team, because I saw a lack of good tutorials, but mostly what I have been doing is Swiki cleanup, which seems more like website maintenance work. The other members of the doc team have been writing tutorials and screencasts, but not me. This is not really a problem until one wants to collaborate with others on a particular cleanup task. Simon Michael has said he would be interested in such a task. Perhaps Swiki cleanup could be a joint effort between the doc team and web teams, and we could host a "Page of the week/month" type focus. That seems quite on target with the web-team list, where folks gather to discuss page edits. Might that be a good idea? If so, where should it be hosted? on the web team list? the doc team list? or on the Swiki? I don't want to have to cross-post again. If there is interest, I know just where to start...-- -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808
8 Jun 2007 03:24
Re: Documentation page update
Matthew Fulmer wrote: > I am considering doing a large overhaul on the documentation > page on wwwtest.squeak.org. I started by fixing the broken links > on the wwwtest site which had already been fixed on the main > page. > The use of "Documentation" is a bit of a misnomer for this page. It really is a collection of useful ways to search and learn about squeak. Maybe we should think of another title instead of "documentation", as I do think something like this would be good on the main site (and point to the real documentation on the wiki.) Maybe rename to "Resources"? Then provide useful ways to learn about squeak, including pointing to documentation. > PS. I am not sure whether to cross-post this message to the > doc-team list, so I did not. I am not sure if there is or should > be a definable separation of duties between the two team's goals > My take is that the documentation team is slated to provide ways for people to learn and edumacate themselves about squeak's environment, the smalltalk language, etc. I thought the team was going to create better documentation about the classes/methods and also provide links to all the wonderful documentation resources on the web (and at Amazon!) I think it would also be nice if the documentation team helped developers, or build processes for them, so programmers find it easier (or force them to!) write documentation about their apps/code in the future (thus helping you from continually writing documentation!) I think the webteam is responsible for maintaining the website that provides a frontend to everything about squeak. That includes ways to find the documentation, but also other important things that other groups are responsible for. For instance, the Foundation, where and how to download the latest squeak, providing some advertising and PR about squeak (e.g. the Features page.) So, I see them different. -- -- brad fuller www.bradfuller.com +1 (408) 799-6124
RSS Feed