Eddie Cottongim | 1 Oct 2005 04:12
Picon
Favicon

Re: Squeak 3.8 with big fonts is terribly slow

Measuring 10Browsers, on Windows, going from default fonts to 17 point 
comic I got a ~37% slowdown on 3.8 and 3.9a-6681, and a 57% slowdown on 3.7.

I couldn't find any behavior as bad as what you saw. I did find a few 
bottlenecks that could be easily fixed and got scrolling about 60% 
faster, and brought the 10browser slowdown to about 26%.

Try out these changes and see if they help; if they are useful I'll 
submit them for 3.9.

Eddie

Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:

>  Noury,
>
>  
>
>>For my lectures, I changed all fonts (lists, menus, code, ...) to 
>>ComicSansMS-17 Point-Bold.
>>But, it leads to a slow-down of reactivity. I have to wait (about 2 
>>seconds)  when selecting/resizeing/moving windows or openning 
>>menus/windows (up to 10-12 seconds when openning a filelist!).
>>
>>BTW, I'm using mac carbon VM 3.8.9b1 on a G4 1.33Mz powerbook 12" with 
>>512M of RAM.
>>I made the test with a full 3.8-6665 image and a basic one also.
>>    
>>
>
(Continue reading)

Daniel Vainsencher | 1 Oct 2005 04:57
Picon

Re: [ANN] new version of services available for preview

This is a funny thing about these subjective things like what the event 
bindings should be, and alternative looks.

On the one hand, these things are intrusive, and people notice them, so 
there's lots of feedback and argument. On the other hand, they're 
fragile, so they don't get very well maintained outside the image. On 
the third hand, since we are eventually incorporating various changes by 
different people from different periods, we end up having this weird 
collage of things that don't really quite fit together.

When, oh when, will we have people working on the infrastructure to make 
all these themable, easily definable by a single UI oriented person, and 
so forth with half the enthusiasm that people have for yet another tweak...

I will note that services really is exactly such a thing, but the 
infrastructure aspects (we could define keymapping from a UI, instead of 
hardcoding them! you could choose your own, and let no one ever change 
it!) get completely ignored in favor of the "triple-click vs. three-key 
sequence" arguments. Now this is just my opinion, but I say Blech.

</rant>

Daniel

Hernan Tylim wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am with Tim here. Clicking and double-clicking inside a text field is 
> a today de-facto standard for positioning and selecting text.
> 
(Continue reading)

Martin Snelgrove | 1 Oct 2005 06:17

Complex functions -- hacking "Float"

I'm looking at Smalltalk for some control systems work, for which  
Complex is essential (plus plenty of other stuff).
I just sent in arcSin etc for Complex, which is probably  
uncontroversial. What I plan to do next, though, is probably
easy to get wrong. For my use, anyway, Float needs to work nicely  
with Complex, and in particular lots of functions
that return FloatingPointException and such at the moment should  
return Complex.

The obvious example is "-1 sqrt", which I plan to have return "1 i",  
but most of the mathematical functions will change.
I propose only to touch the cases that currently return errors.

Is there any obvious reason not to do this? I assume that programs  
aren't being written to rely on the error returns,
for example.
     regards
         ws

Ken Causey | 1 Oct 2005 09:03
Gravatar

Squeak Chat Wednesday October 5th 05:00 GMT

Just a reminder that the next Squeak Chat will take place between
05:00 (5 AM) and 09:00 (9 AM) GMT Wednesday October 5th, 2005.

As usual we will meet in #squeak on irc.freenode.net.  More information
about the #squeak IRC channel can be found at

http://people.squeakfoundation.org/article/7.html

This is a good time to contribute to the development of Squeak
by participating in the Harvesting Process.  One of the main
ways to contribute is by Reviewing submitted fixes and
enhancements.  For information about the Harvesting Process
see

http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3152

If you have the time please attend and work toward the future of Squeak.

The next seven chats are scheduled for

09:00 (09:00 AM) GMT Sunday October 09, 2005

13:00 (01:00 PM) GMT Thursday October 13, 2005

17:00 (05:00 PM) GMT Monday October 17, 2005

21:00 (09:00 PM) GMT Friday October 21, 2005

01:00 (01:00 AM) GMT Wednesday October 26, 2005

(Continue reading)

stéphane ducasse | 1 Oct 2005 09:56
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: Squeak 3.8 with big fonts is terribly slow

Hi eddie

we (marcus and me) really appreciate what you are doing to speed up  
morphic.
Please continue and ping us if we forget to harvest your cool enh.

Stef

On 1 oct. 05, at 04:12, Eddie Cottongim wrote:

> Measuring 10Browsers, on Windows, going from default fonts to 17  
> point comic I got a ~37% slowdown on 3.8 and 3.9a-6681, and a 57%  
> slowdown on 3.7.
>
> I couldn't find any behavior as bad as what you saw. I did find a  
> few bottlenecks that could be easily fixed and got scrolling about  
> 60% faster, and brought the 10browser slowdown to about 26%.
>
> Try out these changes and see if they help; if they are useful I'll  
> submit them for 3.9.
>
> Eddie
>
>
> Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
>
>
>>  Noury,
>>
>>
(Continue reading)

stéphane ducasse | 1 Oct 2005 10:00
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: [ANN] new version of services available for preview

Hi Daniel

I agree. This is why keymapping will be an important package in the  
future.
I always found strange that there was only one shortcut table shared  
by all the system objects.
This is also why services are important.

Stef

> This is a funny thing about these subjective things like what the  
> event bindings should be, and alternative looks.
>
> On the one hand, these things are intrusive, and people notice  
> them, so there's lots of feedback and argument. On the other hand,  
> they're fragile, so they don't get very well maintained outside the  
> image. On the third hand, since we are eventually incorporating  
> various changes by different people from different periods, we end  
> up having this weird collage of things that don't really quite fit  
> together.
>
> When, oh when, will we have people working on the infrastructure to  
> make all these themable, easily definable by a single UI oriented  
> person, and so forth with half the enthusiasm that people have for  
> yet another tweak...
>
> I will note that services really is exactly such a thing, but the  
> infrastructure aspects (we could define keymapping from a UI,  
> instead of hardcoding them! you could choose your own, and let no  
> one ever change it!) get completely ignored in favor of the "triple- 
(Continue reading)

Hilaire Fernandes | 1 Oct 2005 10:39

Squeak in Japanese

Hello,

I will make a conference tour in Taiwan and I would like to show Squeak
running with Asian language, I know there are good achievement in
Japanese, so I would like to add to my 3.8 image (a standard one) the
necessary components (I guess font and translation file) to get it in
Japanese.

What do I need to do ?

Hilaire Fenandes

karl | 1 Oct 2005 10:48
Picon

Re: Squeak 3.8 with big fonts is terribly slow

stéphane ducasse wrote:

> Hi eddie
>
> we (marcus and me) really appreciate what you are doing to speed up  
> morphic.
> Please continue and ping us if we forget to harvest your cool enh.
>
> Stef
>
>
I like the speed up, too :-)
Go, Eddie!
Karl

> On 1 oct. 05, at 04:12, Eddie Cottongim wrote:
>
>> Measuring 10Browsers, on Windows, going from default fonts to 17  
>> point comic I got a ~37% slowdown on 3.8 and 3.9a-6681, and a 57%  
>> slowdown on 3.7.
>>
>> I couldn't find any behavior as bad as what you saw. I did find a  
>> few bottlenecks that could be easily fixed and got scrolling about  
>> 60% faster, and brought the 10browser slowdown to about 26%.
>>
>> Try out these changes and see if they help; if they are useful I'll  
>> submit them for 3.9.
>>
>> Eddie
>>
(Continue reading)

karl | 1 Oct 2005 11:00
Picon

Re: Re: A first integration of Roel Typer in Squeak

Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

>Seems nobody likes MorphicWrappers.
>I have this working with some faults, but what works is amazing.
>  
>
Where can download this ?
Karl

Ron Teitelbaum | 1 Oct 2005 04:25
Picon
Favicon

[Newbee] Salutations

Hello all,

 

I’ve been lurking a bit.  I just through I’d poke my head up and say hello.

 

I’ve been doing smalltalk programming for 9 years, was principal software engineer for HealthObjects writing institutional pharmacy software in VW.

 

I’m working on a new project now and we are thinking of doing it all in squeak.  I’ve been poking around and I have to say squeak is very nice.  Hats off to everyone that has been working on squeak.   You should all be very proud.

 

I’ve been reading up on your squeak foundation issues.  My opinion is that there is no reason that the squeak foundation could not be as big as SUN.  My biggest argument so far to support Java has been the corporate support for the platform, the amount of development underway, and the number of large corporations that support it.  I’m amazed at the level of acceptance for Java. 

 

The foundation needs very experienced business people, some promotions and education focused to encourage corporate acceptance, and a solid and growing user community producing a strong capable business development platform.  We all know that smalltalk is just as capable (if not more) but the business world, and it’s consultants like Gartner Group, sees us as risky. 

 

What I think is really funny is that most of the smalltalk to Java conversions that I’ve heard about have failed, and secret support of smalltalk is on the rise.  The time is right for something big to happen in the smalltalk community.  Croquet could be that big thing, it sure looks interesting.  What ever the big thing is, whether it’s the foundation, or some really cool software, hopefully it will encourage those that believe in smalltalk and the companies that depend on it to say so.

 

Ok so back to lurking,

 

Ron Teitelbaum

President / Principal Software Engineer

US Medical Record Specialists

 

 

 



Gmane