headers
SourceForge.net | 14 Apr 00:55
Picon
Favicon

[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Feature Requests item #671444, was opened at 2003-01-20 22:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=362788&aid=671444&group_id=12788

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Bryn Keller (xoltar)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Initial Comment:
Background:

Nice currently allows local variables which are of
option types to be tested using simple "if" statements:

?String foo = null;
// ...
if (foo != null) {
   //Here foo is of type String, not ?String.
}

Within the body of a (foo != null) block, foo is
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 14 Apr 17:29
Picon
Favicon

[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Feature Requests item #671444, was opened at 2003-01-20 22:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=362788&aid=671444&group_id=12788

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Bryn Keller (xoltar)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Initial Comment:
Background:

Nice currently allows local variables which are of
option types to be tested using simple "if" statements:

?String foo = null;
// ...
if (foo != null) {
   //Here foo is of type String, not ?String.
}

Within the body of a (foo != null) block, foo is
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 14 Apr 17:37
Picon
Favicon

[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Feature Requests item #671444, was opened at 2003-01-20 22:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=362788&aid=671444&group_id=12788

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Bryn Keller (xoltar)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Initial Comment:
Background:

Nice currently allows local variables which are of
option types to be tested using simple "if" statements:

?String foo = null;
// ...
if (foo != null) {
   //Here foo is of type String, not ?String.
}

Within the body of a (foo != null) block, foo is
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 14 Apr 17:45
Picon
Favicon

[ nice-Feature Requests-671444 ] Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Feature Requests item #671444, was opened at 2003-01-20 22:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=362788&aid=671444&group_id=12788

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Bryn Keller (xoltar)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Enhanced Null testing with class or instance variables

Initial Comment:
Background:

Nice currently allows local variables which are of
option types to be tested using simple "if" statements:

?String foo = null;
// ...
if (foo != null) {
   //Here foo is of type String, not ?String.
}

Within the body of a (foo != null) block, foo is
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |

Gmane