Re: [groovy-dev] How are branches managed .
Why not GitHub?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@...> wrote:
> Please, no, not that debate, LOL :-D
> Git is the alternative to SVN that Codehaus provides, so there's no
> Mercurial or Bazaar available anyway.
> Furthermore, even though Git may not necessarily the best options of
> all, it became the option that a lot of other OSS projects and
> companies have chosen, and it seems to be the choice of the majority
> in that field.
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:17, Martin C. Martin
>> Out of curiosity (and I DON'T want to start a flame war), why Git rather
>> than Mercurial?
>> On 11/2/2010 5:45 AM, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
>>> We'll be moving to Git soon.
>>> We were waiting for some big refactorings of the internals that Jochen
>>> has done recently, and we also need to sync with Paul regarding our
>>> modularity concerns.
>>> But the move will certainly be done soon -- "soon" being a vague
>>> notion, but we've never been closer to it
>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:42, Russel Winder<russel@...> wrote: