[groovy-dev] Re: [picocontainer-dev] Article about NanoWeb and where to go from here?
2004-08-02 16:44:03 GMT
Pelle Braendgaard wrote: (I'm cc-ing the groovy crowd since this should be of interest to them - James, please approve the message when it arrives - I'm not subscribed to the groovy dev list). >I've just posted an article about NanoWeb which might be of interest to people >on this list. In particular I would like to know of any half truths or abject >lies I might have slipped in. >http://talk.org/archives/000297.html > > > Excellent article. I have already linked it in: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/NANO/NanoContainer+NanoWeb (I am assuming from your name that you're Danish, and hope I got your last name right It might be worthwhile emphasising a bit more that the view resoultion relies on a naming convention. I also totally agree that we should avoid adding cruft like validation etc. What we do need is better docs on how to blend in other mature validation/aop/whatever frameworks with some examples. >I mention in the article that I would like to take on adding support for >multiple view types. In the NanoWebServlet the ChainingDispatcher is >instantiated with the (".vm") extension thus hard coding it to velocity. I >was wondering if anyone had thought about what approach to use to extend it? > >(Continue reading)