Another question.. I got a json as a response, but its not byte-encoded could i make it byte-encoded and decode it via unmarshal?

Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2012 00:50:51 UTC+2 schrieb Christian Schmitt:

Oh my god.. No... Sorry dude..

it works know -.- missed the string.Reader() my solution was so close, but i overreaded you and the string reader...

solutions can be so easy..

Am Montag, 30. April 2012 23:56:35 UTC+2 schrieb Kyle Lemons:

Did you read my post?

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Christian Schmitt <c.schmitt-7OAYUylD4M3gyKjI7qutAw@public.gmane.org> wrote:

req.FormValue("status=SHUTDOWN") didn't work cause it will be ignored. but i don't know how to form a io.Reader with a string like "status=SHUTDOWN" or a json string. 

Am Montag, 30. April 2012 23:28:45 UTC+2 schrieb Christian Schmitt:

Yeah I got this already:

package main

import "fmt"

import "net/http"

import "io/ioutil"

func main() {

client := &http.Client{}

req, _ := http.NewRequest("PUT", "https://api.jiffybox.de/HASH/v1.0/jiffyBoxes/ID", nil)

req.FormValue := "status=SHUTDOWN"

resp, _ := client.Do(req)

out, _ := ioutil.ReadAll(resp.Body)

resp.Body.Close()

fmt.Printf("%s", out)

}

Still I didn't need to know how to send the Data like "status=SHUTDOWN" or in json {"key1":value1} I only know how to make a request not how to send data.. that is my problem i know i need something with io.Reader but don't know how to make it correctly

Am Montag, 30. April 2012 22:53:03 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Dobler:

On Apr 30, 10:27 pm, Christian Schmitt <c.schm... <at> briefdomain.de>
wrote:
> I searched the HTTP Library but I didn't find anything to make a HTTPS
> Request, so how could I do it?

Did you try something like (untested pseudocode):
  request, err := http.NewRequest("PUT", url, body)
  response, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(request)
?

V

Another question.. I got a json as a response, but its not byte-encoded could i make it byte-encoded and decode it via unmarshal?

Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2012 00:50:51 UTC+2 schrieb Christian Schmitt:

Oh my god.. No... Sorry dude..

it works know -.- missed the string.Reader() my solution was so close, but i overreaded you and the string reader...

solutions can be so easy..

Am Montag, 30. April 2012 23:56:35 UTC+2 schrieb Kyle Lemons:

Did you read my post?

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Christian Schmitt <c.schmitt-7OAYUylD4M3gyKjI7qutAw@public.gmane.org> wrote:

req.FormValue("status=SHUTDOWN") didn't work cause it will be ignored. but i don't know how to form a io.Reader with a string like "status=SHUTDOWN" or a json string. 

Am Montag, 30. April 2012 23:28:45 UTC+2 schrieb Christian Schmitt:

Yeah I got this already:

package main

import "fmt"

import "net/http"

import "io/ioutil"

func main() {

client := &http.Client{}

req, _ := http.NewRequest("PUT", "https://api.jiffybox.de/HASH/v1.0/jiffyBoxes/ID", nil)

req.FormValue := "status=SHUTDOWN"

resp, _ := client.Do(req)

out, _ := ioutil.ReadAll(resp.Body)

resp.Body.Close()

fmt.Printf("%s", out)

}

Still I didn't need to know how to send the Data like "status=SHUTDOWN" or in json {"key1":value1} I only know how to make a request not how to send data.. that is my problem i know i need something with io.Reader but don't know how to make it correctly

Am Montag, 30. April 2012 22:53:03 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Dobler:

On Apr 30, 10:27 pm, Christian Schmitt <c.schm... <at> briefdomain.de>
wrote:
> I searched the HTTP Library but I didn't find anything to make a HTTPS
> Request, so how could I do it?

Did you try something like (untested pseudocode):
  request, err := http.NewRequest("PUT", url, body)
  response, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(request)
?

V

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Joubin Houshyar <jhoushyar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

The ancient Greeks and their insights truly amaze me. I too am an admirer. (Democritus, ...)

Please don't admire Democritus for the atomic theory. The only thing his notion of atomic theory has in common with ours is the name.

Thomas

 

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tbushnell-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Joubin Houshyar <jhoushyar <at> gmail.com> wrote:

The ancient Greeks and their insights truly amaze me. I too am an admirer. (Democritus, ...)

Please don't admire Democritus for the atomic theory. The only thing his notion of atomic theory has in common with ours is the name.

I am inclined to give the poor man a break, considering his time, available tools, and the views of his relative contemporaries.  He was not a scientist, but an intelligent and insightful speculator (which is a worthwhile occupation in my book).  At least he did not mistake the brain for a radiator. :)  

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Joubin Houshyar <jhoushyar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tbushnell-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Joubin Houshyar <jhoushyar <at> gmail.com> wrote:

The ancient Greeks and their insights truly amaze me. I too am an admirer. (Democritus, ...)

Please don't admire Democritus for the atomic theory. The only thing his notion of atomic theory has in common with ours is the name.

I am inclined to give the poor man a break, considering his time, available tools, and the views of his relative contemporaries.  He was not a scientist, but an intelligent and insightful speculator (which is a worthwhile occupation in my book).  At least he did not mistake the brain for a radiator. :)  

I'm not criticizing him, but just saying, don't admire him as if he was right about the atomic theory. The things where he should be admired--and there are certainly many--lie elsewhere.

Thomas

 

I'm not criticizing him, but just saying, don't admire him as if he was right about the atomic theory. The things where he should be admired--and there are certainly many--lie elsewhere.

I did sense that.  What do you admire about him?

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Joubin Houshyar <jhoushyar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

I'm not criticizing him, but just saying, don't admire him as if he was right about the atomic theory. The things where he should be admired--and there are certainly many--lie elsewhere.

I did sense that.  What do you admire about him?

He's a materialist, in the tradition of the Milesians, in a good way.

I think he had a good style of responding to Parmenides, though I prefer Anaxagoras.