1 Sep 2010 01:11
Re: Controls by code are invisible in Gnome
EA7DFH <ea7dfh <at> ea7dfh.com>
2010-08-31 23:11:35 GMT
2010-08-31 23:11:35 GMT
El 31/08/10 22:50, Fabián Flores Vadell escribió: > I was testing a custom control in a Ubuntu 9.10 virtualized by > VirtualBox (using Gambas 2.18), and my controls become invisible in > execution time. This not happens on Kubuntu 10.04 on virtualbox too > (using Gambas 2.20). > > I was suprized when I verified that the same happens with controls > provided by Gambas, What's could be happening? > > 'lbl1 is invisible in time execution > PUBLIC SUB _new() > DIM lbl1 AS NEW Label(ME) > > lbl1.Text = "Hi people" > END > Sorry for re-posting... I've clicked the Send button too early! May be you need to specify X, Y coordinates and size for the new widget to be positioned on your form? -- -- Jesus, EA7DFH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.(Continue reading)
Did I do something wrong with the update or the bug survived ?
Robi
-----Original Message-----
From: Benoît Minisini <gambas <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Reply-to: mailing list for gambas users
<gambas-user <at> lists.sourceforge.net>
To: mailing list for gambas users <gambas-user <at> lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] TableView issue
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:46:13 +0200
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I found a strange behavior of the tableview control. I use Gambas 2.20,
> > qt, on ubuntu 10.04.
> >
> > I try to create an editable table.
> > As long as I use only text input, it works fine.
> > As long as I use lists or text and list but with unprotected
> > (readonly=false, as by default) lists, it works fine. In this case I can
> > use the arrows to move up and down, left and right. It is very
> > comfortable. As long as I use protected lists (readonly=true) it works
> > fine as well, except that I cannot move left and right with the arrows.
> > It is less comfortable but still okay.
RSS Feed