2 Sep 2011 12:29
Re: Some minor patches / E stack traces
On 2011-08-26 13:56, Kevin Reid wrote: > On Aug 26, 2011, at 6:55, Thomas Leonard wrote: > >> On 2011-08-24 16:19, Kevin Reid wrote: >>> On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:17, Thomas Leonard wrote: >>>> http://gitorious.org/~tal-itinnov/repo-roscidus/it-innovation/commit/e14b3b40363499712b93680c09d0a730e6b48271 >>>> >>>> Give a shorter stack-trace from ELoader if the source file is missing >>> >>> Is this really worth the additional complexity of the code? >> >> Maybe. I think that part of the problem is that E stack traces are >> hard to read. There's a lot of information (which is useful), but >> it's hard to scan by eye. > > Mm. I've always found the leading symbols ( <at> . -) to be sufficient, > but I agree colorizing is a reasonable improvement. > >> There's a patch on my "hacks" branch that colours the stack >> traces: >> >> http://gitorious.org/~tal-itinnov/repo-roscidus/it-innovation/commit/f3da8f91a5a4ce9aebb8d484780a98fde389de05 >> >> >> "." lines are highlighted in yellow and<file:...> references are >> highlighted in green. >> >> So, if you want to know *what* calls were made (including values),(Continue reading)
RSS Feed