Re: E patches for review: ELoader, seedVat
On Jun 4, 2010, at 8:38, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:50 -0400, Kevin Reid wrote:
> [...]
>> Ah. Your question is not 'how to uncall makeTraceln' but 'how to
>> uncall the loader'. And the answer is to use 'something else'.
>>
>> Since makeELoader gives authority to log with arbitrary prefixes, it
>> should not be exposed: so loader objects, i.e. <this> must not use
>> __optUncall but rather some amplifier.
>>
>> The role to be filled loader/uncaller pair which gives access to
>> "process authorities" such as makeTraceln and <file> objects,
>> allowing
>> them to be passed between vats... but shouldn't the usual set,
>> [<unsafe>, <file>, ...] suffice for that? Maybe we need something
>> extensible in that set (i.e. an unsealer amplifier with a public
>> sealer) so that your ELoaders can be uncalled by that?
>
> Is it possible to use sealers with PassByCopy objects? There are a
> number of objects (e.g. <file:...>, ELoaders) that could be pass-by-
> copy
> over boot-comm (but pass-by-proxy over CapTP) but would need to use
> __optSealedDispatch.
The notion of PassByConstruction is defined in terms of "should this
behave this way *over the standard CapTP*". PassByCopy is just the
additional restriction that the object is Selfless such that a
roundtrip gets you the original object as defined by Equalizer.
There is no reason for these objects not to pass over boot-comm in
(Continue reading)