Thomas Lübking | 2 Apr 02:29 2012
Picon

BUG 297272

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297272

This bug is my fault, i forgot to copy/fix the visibleRect() for "Deleted"  
clients.

The patch is trivial, adding a public

virtual inline QRect visibleRect() const
     {
         return Toplevel::visibleRect().adjusted(-padding_left,  
-padding_top, padding_right, padding_bottom);
     }

to deleted.h will fix it.

-> can we push this into 4.8.2 before the official release?

 <at> Martin
I'll be away tomorrow (no idea when ~ noon) and likely not have access to  
a development system before Thursday night (and internet before tomorrow  
evening)
In case we get permission to push this, it could mean that you'll have to  
do :-\

Cheers,
Thomas

(the issue comes with the fade effect, neither xrender, nor git master,  
nor the AnimationEffect's (not for 4.8 either) are affected - great)
(Continue reading)

Jonathan Riddell | 2 Apr 12:02 2012

Fwd: Re: KSecrets

It is alpha state, it should not be included in SC 4.8.

----- Forwarded message from Valentin Rusu <kde <at> rusu.info> -----

Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:48:41 +0200
From: Valentin Rusu <kde <at> rusu.info>
To: Anne-Marie Mahfouf <annemarie.mahfouf <at> free.fr>
Cc: annma <at> kde.org, jriddell <at> ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: KSecrets

On 03/31/2012 12:04 PM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
>Hi Valentin,

Hello,

>
>I am inquiring with this mail about the status of KSecrets. Several 
>questions were raised recently:
>- Is KSecret used within KDE? If so, how?

KSecrets is not yet used within KDE. It aims to replace KWallet and it 
was previously started by Michael Leupold who worked with Stef Walter 
from GNOME/keyring to define a freedesktop.org specification for a 
secrets storing service. GNOME/keyring already implements this 
interface, but I don't know if it's ready.

When I attended the last Randa meeting, I started the implementation of 
a client library, initially designed for kdelibs. That library is ready 
to be used. In parallelel, I did a KWallet implementation based on that 
library. But when I attempted to include it in kdelibs, a veto came from 
(Continue reading)

Dirk Mueller | 2 Apr 13:25 2012
Picon

Re: KDE 4.8.2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded

On Friday 30 March 2012, Rex Dieter wrote:

> > kde-base-artwork-4.8.2 installs the same ksplash theme that already comes
> > with kde-workspace.
> Looks like creating that separate kde-base-artwork tarball was a mistake
> (happened in 4.8.1 too, which also differred from 4.8.0)

Yes, kde-base-artwork was accidentally in the svn-tarball list still. I've 
removed it from there now (and deleted the generated tarball on ftp).

Thanks,
Dirk
Dirk Mueller | 2 Apr 13:36 2012
Picon

Re: KDE 4.8.2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded

On Saturday 31 March 2012, Andrea Scarpino wrote:

> Maybe you want to add this commit:
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde-
> baseapps/konsole/repository/revisions/bf3e57e94b54c1c4337d7960e0fda0ef98156
> 451
> 
> Is a workaround to the font issue with Qt 4.8 (KDEBUG#280896)

Hi, 

I've added it. I've also updated kdesdk to fix the permission issues: 

a47a7a28ba48e5553bdb610c548a32dd  kdesdk-4.8.2.tar.xz
c63b525e94a0e7e1753ea3d9dbff6970  konsole-4.8.2.tar.xz

Greetings,
Dirk
Anne-Marie Mahfouf | 2 Apr 15:20 2012
Picon

Re: Fwd: Re: KSecrets

On 04/02/2012 12:02 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> It is alpha state, it should not be included in SC 4.8.
>
I think I remember that when it was in review it was mentioned that it 
was in alpha state and that having it in production would make it test 
and fixed and improved. This did not happen.

I am in favor of removing it, as is Jonathan.

What do other people think?

Anne-Marie

> ----- Forwarded message from Valentin Rusu<kde <at> rusu.info>  -----
>
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:48:41 +0200
> From: Valentin Rusu<kde <at> rusu.info>
> To: Anne-Marie Mahfouf<annemarie.mahfouf <at> free.fr>
> Cc: annma <at> kde.org, jriddell <at> ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: KSecrets
>
> On 03/31/2012 12:04 PM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
>> Hi Valentin,
> Hello,
>
>> I am inquiring with this mail about the status of KSecrets. Several
>> questions were raised recently:
>> - Is KSecret used within KDE? If so, how?
> KSecrets is not yet used within KDE. It aims to replace KWallet and it
> was previously started by Michael Leupold who worked with Stef Walter
(Continue reading)

Albert Astals Cid | 2 Apr 19:06 2012
Picon

Re: Fwd: Re: KSecrets

El Dilluns, 2 d'abril de 2012, a les 15:20:12, Anne-Marie Mahfouf va escriure:
> On 04/02/2012 12:02 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > It is alpha state, it should not be included in SC 4.8.
> 
> I think I remember that when it was in review it was mentioned that it
> was in alpha state and that having it in production would make it test
> and fixed and improved. This did not happen.
> 
> I am in favor of removing it, as is Jonathan.
> 
> What do other people think?

People will complain we are removing stuff from 4.8.1 to 4.8.2 (even if it's 
stuff they never used)

My suggestion is to leave it there as i don't see it hurting us at the moment 
and make sure it is in good shape for 4.9

Albert

> 
> Anne-Marie
> 
> > ----- Forwarded message from Valentin Rusu<kde <at> rusu.info>  -----
> > 
> > Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:48:41 +0200
> > From: Valentin Rusu<kde <at> rusu.info>
> > To: Anne-Marie Mahfouf<annemarie.mahfouf <at> free.fr>
> > Cc: annma <at> kde.org, jriddell <at> ubuntu.com
> > Subject: Re: KSecrets
(Continue reading)

Thomas Lübking | 3 Apr 00:37 2012
Picon

Re: BUG 297272

W/o wanting to be nasty (rather nervous), has
http://commits.kde.org/kde-workspace/a5c8eca4759d1aace9fc265fef2b7ebb88ca3690
been picked or will it be picked for the official 4.8.2 release?

Cheers,
Thomas

2012/4/2, Thomas Lübking <thomas.luebking <at> gmail.com>:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297272
>
> This bug is my fault, i forgot to copy/fix the visibleRect() for "Deleted"
> clients.
>
> The patch is trivial, adding a public
>
> virtual inline QRect visibleRect() const
>      {
>          return Toplevel::visibleRect().adjusted(-padding_left,
> -padding_top, padding_right, padding_bottom);
>      }
>
> to deleted.h will fix it.
>
> -> can we push this into 4.8.2 before the official release?
>
>  <at> Martin
> I'll be away tomorrow (no idea when ~ noon) and likely not have access to
> a development system before Thursday night (and internet before tomorrow
> evening)
> In case we get permission to push this, it could mean that you'll have to
(Continue reading)

Will Stephenson | 3 Apr 06:53 2012
Picon

Re: BUG 297272

On Tuesday 03 Apr 2012 00:37:53 Thomas Lübking wrote:
> W/o wanting to be nasty (rather nervous), has
> http://commits.kde.org/kde-workspace/a5c8eca4759d1aace9fc265fef2b7ebb88ca369
> 0 been picked or will it be picked for the official 4.8.2 release?

Not yet, but I'm hoping Dirk will pick this and the kdepim-runtime fix 
mentioned by Allen on r-t too.

Will
Jonathan Riddell | 3 Apr 10:10 2012

Re: Fwd: Re: KSecrets

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 2 d'abril de 2012, a les 15:20:12, Anne-Marie Mahfouf va escriure:
> > On 04/02/2012 12:02 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > > It is alpha state, it should not be included in SC 4.8.
> > 
> > I think I remember that when it was in review it was mentioned that it
> > was in alpha state and that having it in production would make it test
> > and fixed and improved. This did not happen.
> > 
> > I am in favor of removing it, as is Jonathan.
> > 
> > What do other people think?
> 
> People will complain we are removing stuff from 4.8.1 to 4.8.2 (even if it's 
> stuff they never used)
> 
> My suggestion is to leave it there as i don't see it hurting us at the moment 
> and make sure it is in good shape for 4.9

Shipping alpha software as if it is stable is a mistake and we should fix it.  It will hurt our reputation to
continue doing that.

Jonathan
Albert Astals Cid | 3 Apr 11:04 2012
Picon

Re: Fwd: Re: KSecrets

--- El mar, 3/4/12, Jonathan Riddell escribió:

> +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 2 d'abril de 2012, a les 15:20:12,
> Anne-Marie Mahfouf va escriure:
> > > On 04/02/2012 12:02 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > > > It is alpha state, it should not be included
> in SC 4.8.
> > > 
> > > I think I remember that when it was in review it
> was mentioned that it
> > > was in alpha state and that having it in
> production would make it test
> > > and fixed and improved. This did not happen.
> > > 
> > > I am in favor of removing it, as is Jonathan.
> > > 
> > > What do other people think?
> > 
> > People will complain we are removing stuff from 4.8.1
> to 4.8.2 (even if it's 
> > stuff they never used)
> > 
> > My suggestion is to leave it there as i don't see it
> hurting us at the moment 
> > and make sure it is in good shape for 4.9
> 
> Shipping alpha software as if it is stable is a mistake and
> we should fix it.  It will hurt our reputation to
> continue doing that.
(Continue reading)


Gmane