Hi, On Tuesday 20 December 2011 14:59:37 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Tuesday 13 December 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > May I please also ask for the 4.7.4 tags?! > > 4.7.4 tags have been pushed. > Can you push the 4.8.0 tags please ? Christophe
Can KJots import from KNotes? Removing an app that users may have data in without offering a way to get at it anymore would be a big no-no IMHO. -- -- Best regards, Eike Hein
Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9? Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months cycle). Obviously this means that either: a) We release 4.9 not using frameworks at all (and using kdelibs 4.8 renamed to 4.9 like we did this time) b) We wait until frameworks is out I'm leaning towards a) since b) might end up meaning an undefinite delay. Opinions? Albert
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 23:03:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9? > > Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around > Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months > cycle). Obviously this means that either: > a) We release 4.9 not using frameworks at all (and using kdelibs 4.8 > renamed to 4.9 like we did this time) > b) We wait until frameworks is out > > I'm leaning towards a) since b) might end up meaning an undefinite delay. My understanding of the whole frameworks development was that it does not disrupt the application development. Given that it has to be a) IMHO and that is also what I would personally prefer (as I doubt that we (kwin) can switch to Qt 5 without quite some work going into the porting). Cheers Martin
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 23:03:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9? > > Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around > Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months > cycle). Obviously this means that either: > a) We release 4.9 not using frameworks at all (and using kdelibs 4.8 > renamed to 4.9 like we did this time) > b) We wait until frameworks is out > > I'm leaning towards a) since b) might end up meaning an undefinite delay. > > Opinions? Definitely go for (a), if we do a release of Frameworks around Akademy that will be a technology preview to test the water and detect what might be missing. You'd still need to start porting apps to Qt5 and KF5 itself after that, etc. Definitely not 4.9 material IMO. Regards. -- -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 5:03:57 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9? > > Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around > Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months > cycle). Obviously this means that either: > a) We release 4.9 not using frameworks at all (and using kdelibs 4.8 renamed > to 4.9 like we did this time) > b) We wait until frameworks is out > a) absolutely yes
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 23:03:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9? > > Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around > Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months > cycle). Obviously this means that either: > a) We release 4.9 not using frameworks at all (and using kdelibs 4.8 > renamed to 4.9 like we did this time) > b) We wait until frameworks is out > > I'm leaning towards a) since b) might end up meaning an undefinite delay. > > Opinions? Strongly for a) (and 4.10, ...) as it lets us show we've learned from 4.0 and keep most users on 4.x until 5.x is really ready for them. See Libreoffice's explicit definition of who .0 releases are for here: http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/07/01/libreoffice-3-4-1-provides- stable-new-features-for-every-user/ . Will
El Dilluns, 20 de febrer de 2012, a les 09:07:28, Allen Winter va escriure: > Albert or Tom, > > Could you create a release schedule for 4.9 using Tom's nifty program > and put it on our wiki for review? http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.9_Release_Schedule Akademy falls in between RC1 and RC2 4.9.4 is delayed not to have a tag on December 24th and release on January 1st I killed 4.9.5 since we have not have been having .5 releases lately afair Albert P.S: Feels good to be the only one that knows how to press some buttons in a GUI> > -Allen > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > release-team <at> kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
RSS Feed56 | |
|---|---|
47 | |
61 | |
23 | |
50 | |
81 | |
47 | |
41 | |
25 | |
26 | |
63 | |
197 | |
124 | |
72 | |
52 | |
40 | |
146 | |
114 | |
125 | |
60 | |
23 | |
81 | |
41 | |
45 | |
93 | |
31 | |
40 | |
135 | |
100 | |
88 | |
73 | |
30 | |
21 | |
70 | |
78 | |
88 | |
65 | |
20 | |
98 | |
42 | |
111 | |
61 | |
85 | |
35 | |
100 | |
99 | |
130 | |
59 | |
191 | |
99 | |
148 | |
59 | |
297 | |
201 | |
230 | |
155 | |
140 | |
67 | |
134 | |
73 | |
90 | |
41 | |
142 | |
38 | |
8 |
