Pierre Schmitz | 1 Feb 03:46
Picon
Gravatar

Re: KDE 4.4.98 (4.4 RC3)

Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 22:36:37 schrieb Dirk Mueller:
> when 
> somebody confirms that it all compiles

It seems to compile fine (including the csharp bindings that were broken in 
RC2).

--

-- 

Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Sebastian Kügler | 1 Feb 15:25
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1083582 by sebas:

Release 4.4.RC3

CCMAIL:release-team@...

 A             announcements/announce-4.4-rc3.php   announcements/announce-4.4-rc2.php#1083564
 M  +6 -0      announcements/index.php  
 M  +5 -3      index.php  
 M  +1 -1      info/releases.php  
 M  +2 -0      whatiskde/project.php  

--- trunk/www/sites/www/announcements/index.php #1083581:1083582
@@ -9,6 +9,12 @@
 KDE Announcements <a
href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-announce">mailinglist</a> !
 </p>

+<!-- KDE 4.4 RC3 released -->
+<strong>1st February 2010</strong> - <a href="announce-4.4-rc3.php">KDE SC 4.4 RC3 Released</a>
+<br />
+"<em>KDE Community Ships Third Release Candidate for KDE SC 4.4.0.</em>"
+<p />
+
 <!-- KDE 4.3.5 released -->
 <strong>26th January 2010</strong> - <a href="announce-4.3.5.php">KDE SC 4.3.5 Released</a>
 <br />
--- trunk/www/sites/www/index.php #1083581:1083582
@@ -63,12 +63,14 @@

(Continue reading)

Rex Dieter | 1 Feb 21:27
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Kopete-jabber is not working anymore

On 01/28/2010 03:51 PM, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> Hi,
> jabber.org has recently changed it's server configuration.
> Now, Kopete is not connecting to any jabber.org account.
>
> How can I tell the release team that this is blocking for KDE 4.4 before we
> have worked the problem out ?

You can propose it as you just did...

However, I don't consider what jabber.org does raises to the level of
blocking a kde release.  It's a bug like any other, and it'll get fixed 
when it gets fixed, hopefully sooner rather than later.

any bug(s) filed (for tracking purposes)?

-- Rex
Rex Dieter | 2 Feb 20:41
Favicon
Gravatar

getting rid of kde-l10n

Hear me out. :)

I'm not proposing anything yet, but would like to hear about the 
pros/cons of
1.  status quo: shipping translations separately to software

2.  shipping translations alonside (ie, in the same release tarballs) 
the software.

How hard would it be to work toward something closer to 2 for KDE SC?

-- Rex
Alexander Neundorf | 2 Feb 21:27
Picon
Favicon

Re: polkit-1 in 4.4 branch

On Monday 01 February 2010, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've compiled 4.3.95 with polkit-1 kauth backend but
> KDE4_INSTALL_AUTH_ACTION installs action files into policykit-0 actions dir
> (see below). The problems seems to be fixed in trunk but there are many
> changes in kauth-related cmake code. Is it possible to backport these
> changes, or this is too large change for RC3?

Dario is taking care of it.
It should be working then.
This will then still go into 4.4.0 ?

Alex
Rex Dieter | 2 Feb 21:32
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: polkit-1 in 4.4 branch

On 02/02/2010 02:27 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 01 February 2010, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I've compiled 4.3.95 with polkit-1 kauth backend but
>> KDE4_INSTALL_AUTH_ACTION installs action files into policykit-0 actions dir
>> (see below). The problems seems to be fixed in trunk but there are many
>> changes in kauth-related cmake code. Is it possible to backport these
>> changes, or this is too large change for RC3?
>
> Dario is taking care of it.  It should be working then.
 > This will then still go into 4.4.0 ?

Looks fixed/ok in 4.3.98 to me.

-- Rex
Albert Astals Cid | 2 Feb 22:45
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: getting rid of kde-l10n

A Dimarts, 2 de febrer de 2010, Rex Dieter va escriure:
> Hear me out. :)
> 
> I'm not proposing anything yet, but would like to hear about the
> pros/cons of
> 1.  status quo: shipping translations separately to software
> 
> 2.  shipping translations alonside (ie, in the same release tarballs)
> the software.
> 
> How hard would it be to work toward something closer to 2 for KDE SC?

What would be the benefit?

Albert

> 
> -- Rex
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team@...
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> 
Rex Dieter | 2 Feb 23:00
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: getting rid of kde-l10n

On 02/02/2010 03:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dimarts, 2 de febrer de 2010, Rex Dieter va escriure:
>> Hear me out. :)
>>
>> I'm not proposing anything yet, but would like to hear about the
>> pros/cons of
>> 1.  status quo: shipping translations separately to software
>>
>> 2.  shipping translations alonside (ie, in the same release tarballs)
>> the software.
>>
>> How hard would it be to work toward something closer to 2 for KDE SC?
>
> What would be the benefit?

I know it's been this way for like forever.  Just wondering what kinds 
of attachments there are, and pros/cons of each approach.

Honestly, part of this comes from my being a distro packager, but 
keeping these separate is ... a bit painful(1).  Also, fedora's release 
team keeps asking my why kde keeps translations separate, and I honestly 
don't have a good answer for them.

Seems only the SC portions keep things separate, I mean extragear 
releases bundle software/translations together, so it's not like it's 
something new or different.

-- Rex

(1) releases that kept software/translations bundled together makes 
(Continue reading)

Lubos Lunak | 2 Feb 23:10
Picon

Re: getting rid of kde-l10n

On Tuesday 02 of February 2010, Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 02/02/2010 03:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Dimarts, 2 de febrer de 2010, Rex Dieter va escriure:
> >> 2.  shipping translations alonside (ie, in the same release tarballs)
> >> the software.
> >>
> >> How hard would it be to work toward something closer to 2 for KDE SC?
> >
> > What would be the benefit?
>
> I know it's been this way for like forever.  Just wondering what kinds
> of attachments there are, and pros/cons of each approach.
>
> Honestly, part of this comes from my being a distro packager, but
> keeping these separate is ... a bit painful(1).  Also, fedora's release
> team keeps asking my why kde keeps translations separate, and I honestly
> don't have a good answer for them.

 Why don't you ask them why it should be changed, and just stop there if they 
don't have a good answer? Why fix something that is not broken.

> Seems only the SC portions keep things separate, I mean extragear
> releases bundle software/translations together, so it's not like it's
> something new or different.

 openSUSE actually bundles together even translations for some extragear 
stuff. And, as a user, I'll much rather install czech translations for few 
apps I perhaps don't use rather than translations for all the languages in 
the world I definitely do not use.

(Continue reading)

Dirk Mueller | 2 Feb 23:33
Picon
Favicon

Re: KDE 4.4.98 (4.4 RC3)

On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Than Ngo wrote:
> The kde-l10n packages are still missing. Dirk, do you know when the
>  kde-l10n will be available on ktown?

ouch.. uploaded, thanks!

Greetings,
Dirk

Gmane