Howdy, We removed korn from the kdepim source tree today and put it into unmaintained/4. Both source code and docs were moved. Korn hasn't been built anyway for awhile. I think this means the translated files need to be moved (or removed) too? Albert? -- -- Allen Winter | Software Engineer | 1-888-872-9339 KDAB, Inc. | "Platform-independent software solutions" http://kdab.com | 1-866-777-5322 (US) | +46-563-540090 (Sweden)
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Dirk Mueller <mueller@...> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've just finished uploading the KDE 4.2.1 release tarballs. I haven't tested > them yet, please report any issues. It seems the present windows desktop effect was much more unstable than I thought it was, it can't be released in its current state. I have made two commits that need to be included in the 4.2.1 packages: r933172 and r934456. Hopefully this won't cause too much trouble. Now I need to work out why it was so unstable even if 4.2.0 worked fine with the same code. -- -- Lucas Murray :: http://www.undefinedfire.com GPG Fingerprint: 0B88 499E 3F5B 1405 D952 258A AD90 B4F5 90B6 3534
> I have made two commits that need to be included in the 4.2.1 > packages: r933172 and r934456. > > Hopefully this won't cause too much trouble. Now I need to work out > why it was so unstable even if 4.2.0 worked fine with the same code. I've updated kdebase-workspace to include those fixes: 5659e3c7c992fab38223b0a467377495 kdebase-workspace-4.2.1.tar.bz2 I have some trouble with syncing it to ktown at the moment, hopefully it will be there when you read the message, otherwise tonight when I'm back online. Greetings, Dirk
Benjamin Reed wrote: > Dirk Mueller wrote: > >> I've just finished uploading the KDE 4.2.1 release tarballs. I haven't tested >> them yet, please report any issues. > >> phonon-4.3.1.tar.bz2 has also been added there. > > Does phonon 4.3.1 require Qt 4.5? CMake isn't enforcing it if so. FYI, richardmg fixed the API issues that kept it from building against Qt 4.4, and I committed some changes that had been in my patch queue for building on OSX. Additionally, the moc/compile issue I ran into was that automoc didn't understand .mm files. I committed a change to automoc to handle that as well. current kdesupport/phonon with kdesupport/automoc trunk is golden on OSX now with CMake. -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/ Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/
On Thursday 05 March 2009 10:42:49 you wrote: > 5 марта 2009 Sebastian Kügler написал: > > KDE Community Improves Desktop with KDE 4.2.1 Codenamed "Cream" > > Hi, Sebastian. Why there are no .xdelta files for KDE 4.2.1 sources? On FTP > I see only tarballs. :( Forwarding to the release-team list, as I don't know about this ... :) -- -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
Hi, I just realized I forgot to bump Gwenview version number from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1 before KDE 4.2.1 got tagged (just fixed it for 4.2.2). I would like to suggest kde packagers to fix the version number in their 4.2.1 packages. What is the best way to communicate this to all (well, most) of them? Aurélien
On Thursday 05 March 2009 17:14:13 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: Hi, > I just realized I forgot to bump Gwenview version number from 2.2.0 to > 2.2.1 before KDE 4.2.1 got tagged (just fixed it for 4.2.2). > > I would like to suggest kde packagers to fix the version number in their > 4.2.1 packages. What is the best way to communicate this to all (well, > most) of them? kde-packager@... might be the most successful way. Regards
Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Hi, > > I just realized I forgot to bump Gwenview version number from 2.2.0 to > 2.2.1 before KDE 4.2.1 got tagged (just fixed it for 4.2.2). > > I would like to suggest kde packagers to fix the version number in their > 4.2.1 packages. What is the best way to communicate this to all (well, > most) of them? mail a patch to kde-packager@... -- Rex
Rex Dieter wrote: > Aurélien Gâteau wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just realized I forgot to bump Gwenview version number from 2.2.0 to >> 2.2.1 before KDE 4.2.1 got tagged (just fixed it for 4.2.2). >> >> I would like to suggest kde packagers to fix the version number in >> their 4.2.1 packages. What is the best way to communicate this to all >> (well, most) of them? > > mail a patch to kde-packager@... Thanks, done. Aurélien
Redirecting to the release team... On Monday 16 March 2009 9:51:55 am Jeff Mitchell wrote: > Hi, > > We Amarok people have split out our Taglib plugins into something > standalone for a couple reasons...partially because we split out one of > our helper programs in a separate package (so they can both depend on > it), and partially so that other people can use it. Right now it lives > in trunk/playground/multimedia/taglib-extras, but we want to get it > released very soon. > > Where is the right place to put this? Keep it living where it is? Or > put it in trunk/kdesupport? Or...? > Is it Qt-only? If so, it could certainly go into kdesupport. -- -- Allen Winter | Software Engineer | 1-888-872-9339 KDAB, Inc. | "Platform-independent software solutions" http://kdab.com | 1-866-777-5322 (US) | +46-563-540090 (Sweden)
RSS Feed6 | |
|---|---|
50 | |
81 | |
47 | |
41 | |
25 | |
26 | |
63 | |
197 | |
124 | |
72 | |
52 | |
40 | |
146 | |
114 | |
125 | |
60 | |
23 | |
81 | |
41 | |
45 | |
93 | |
31 | |
40 | |
135 | |
100 | |
88 | |
73 | |
30 | |
21 | |
70 | |
78 | |
88 | |
65 | |
20 | |
98 | |
42 | |
111 | |
61 | |
85 | |
35 | |
100 | |
99 | |
130 | |
59 | |
191 | |
99 | |
148 | |
59 | |
297 | |
201 | |
230 | |
155 | |
140 | |
67 | |
134 | |
73 | |
90 | |
41 | |
142 | |
38 | |
8 |
