headers
Allen Winter | 3 Feb 13:43
Picon
Favicon

Libical: Increasing Minimum Version Requirement

Howdy,

For trunk, I plan to increase the minimum version requirement
for the Libcal package from 0.33 to 0.42.  Else the kdepimlibs
module will no longer build for you.

If your distribution does not provide version 0.42 (or higher)
then you will need to install it yourself from source, which can
be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/freeassociation
(or ask you distribution to upgrade this package).

Note that you can tell the KDE buildsystem where your self-built
libical is installed by using the LIBICAL_BASE environment variable,
for example: export LIBICAL_BASE=/usr/local

I'll make this change on Monday 16 Feb.

Regards,
Allen, KDEPIM Module Coordinator
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ana Guerrero | 3 Feb 13:44
Picon
Favicon

KDE 4.2.x point releases plans?


Hi!

At the same time the schedule for 4.3 is fixed, what are the plans for the
revision released of 4.2?

Ana
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Alexander Neundorf | 3 Feb 21:09
Picon
Favicon

Re: Libical: Increasing Minimum Version Requirement

On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> For trunk, I plan to increase the minimum version requirement
> for the Libcal package from 0.33 to 0.42.  Else the kdepimlibs
> module will no longer build for you.
>
> If your distribution does not provide version 0.42 (or higher)
> then you will need to install it yourself from source, which can
> be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/freeassociation
> (or ask you distribution to upgrade this package).
>
> Note that you can tell the KDE buildsystem where your self-built
> libical is installed by using the LIBICAL_BASE environment variable,
> for example: export LIBICAL_BASE=/usr/local

Or more generic:
$ export CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/home/alex/my_self_built_stuff
$ cmake ...

Alex
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Pino Toscano | 8 Feb 15:34
X-Face
Picon
Favicon

Re: KDE 4.2.x point releases plans?

Hi,

> At the same time the schedule for 4.3 is fixed, what are the plans for the
> revision released of 4.2?

Given that almost two weeks after KDE 4.2.0 are passed, it would be nice to 
schedule at least 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 to plan testing of fixes on the branch (and 
potential backport of tested semi-fixes in the branch).

--

-- 
Pino Toscano
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Allen Winter | 8 Feb 22:25
Picon
Favicon

Re: KDE 4.2.x point releases plans?

On Sunday 08 February 2009 9:34:20 am Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > At the same time the schedule for 4.3 is fixed, what are the plans for the
> > revision released of 4.2?
> 
> Given that almost two weeks after KDE 4.2.0 are passed, it would be nice to 
> schedule at least 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 to plan testing of fixes on the branch (and 
> potential backport of tested semi-fixes in the branch).
> 

Ok, here's a proposal:

Wed Feb 25th, 2009: Tag KDE 4.2.1
Wed Mar 4th, 2009: Release KDE 4.2.1

Wed Mar 25th, 2009: Tag KDE 4.2.2
Wed Apr 1st, 2009: Release KDE 4.2.2

Let me know if it's ok and I'll put it on the TechBase schedule.
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Matt Rogers | 9 Feb 04:19
Picon
Favicon

Re: KDE 4.2.x point releases plans?

On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:25:09PM -0500, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Sunday 08 February 2009 9:34:20 am Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > At the same time the schedule for 4.3 is fixed, what are the plans for the
> > > revision released of 4.2?
> > 
> > Given that almost two weeks after KDE 4.2.0 are passed, it would be nice to 
> > schedule at least 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 to plan testing of fixes on the branch (and 
> > potential backport of tested semi-fixes in the branch).
> > 
> 
> Ok, here's a proposal:
> 
> Wed Feb 25th, 2009: Tag KDE 4.2.1
> Wed Mar 4th, 2009: Release KDE 4.2.1
> 
> Wed Mar 25th, 2009: Tag KDE 4.2.2
> Wed Apr 1st, 2009: Release KDE 4.2.2

I know, it's a stupid thing, but perhaps April 2nd is better?

> 
> Let me know if it's ok and I'll put it on the TechBase schedule.

Looks fine to me either way.

Thanks
--
Matt
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Allen Winter | 10 Feb 23:58
Picon
Favicon

Re: KDE 4.2.x point releases plans?

On Sunday 08 February 2009 4:25:09 pm Allen Winter wrote:
> On Sunday 08 February 2009 9:34:20 am Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > At the same time the schedule for 4.3 is fixed, what are the plans for the
> > > revision released of 4.2?
> > 
> > Given that almost two weeks after KDE 4.2.0 are passed, it would be nice to 
> > schedule at least 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 to plan testing of fixes on the branch (and 
> > potential backport of tested semi-fixes in the branch).
> > 
> 
> Ok, here's a proposal:
> 
> Wed Feb 25th, 2009: Tag KDE 4.2.1
> Wed Mar 4th, 2009: Release KDE 4.2.1
> 
> Wed Mar 25th, 2009: Tag KDE 4.2.2
> Wed Apr 1st, 2009: Release KDE 4.2.2
> 
> Let me know if it's ok and I'll put it on the TechBase schedule.

Done.
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Release_Schedule
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Legolas | 11 Feb 10:01
Picon
Gravatar

KTron to KDEReview

Hello,

Could someone help me with the move of /playground/games/ktron to 
/kdereview/ktron with inclusion of l10n and docs?

Thanks in advance,

Stas Verberkt
(LegolasV @ FreeNode)
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Allen Winter | 11 Feb 21:21
Picon
Favicon

Re: KTron to KDEReview

On Wednesday 11 February 2009 4:01:36 am Legolas wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Could someone help me with the move of /playground/games/ktron to 
> /kdereview/ktron with inclusion of l10n and docs?
> 
Maybe the kdegames modules coordinator will help you.

Matt Williams?  still alive?  hope so :)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Friedrich W. H. Kossebau | 12 Feb 22:03
Picon
Favicon

Is trunk dependant of Qt 4.5 or not, as of now?

Hi,

I am confused if it is okay to add Qt4.5-dependant code to trunk, without an 
ifdef. What is the official policy? Is there one? There should be. I have no 
opinion in this regard, so I don't request the one or the other, just a need 
for clarity :)

The update of qt-copy to Qt 4.5 could be understood as "depending on 4.5 now", 
but that was done without any official notice to the simple developers as I 
am (at least it passed me without notice), so I don't know about the complete 
scope of that change.

Could there please be an official announcement for the developers in trunk?
And, if I may wish, it would be nice if such changes could be scheduled and 
announced in the future, so everyone can prepare and isn't catched by 
surprise.
Like Alex so nicely warns^Winforms about CMake dependancy changes :)

Which are the official communication channels today, perhaps I just listen on 
the wrong ones?

Thanks
Friedrich
--

-- 
Okteta - KDE 4 Hex Editor - http://utils.kde.org/projects/okteta
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane