Benjamí Villoslada | 1 May 2006 21:54
Picon
Gravatar

Symlink treatment

In order to contain my ~/ stuff volume I've 2 photos directories:

1) ~/photos  (the last photos with ~/ daily backup)
2) /home/stuff/photos  (photos with intermitent DVD and CD backup)

I see all directories with digiKam because one a symlink in ~/photos that 
points to /home/stuff/photos with the name «archived».

But  seems that tactic have some minor problems:

A) When I launch digiKam have 2 «archived» folder: One with the + symbol (that 
works fine) and one useless empty folder.

B) Some actions in digiKam create a new «archived» empty folder, i.e. tag 
image action.

When have a lot of «archived» empty folders I restart digiKam and 
dissapears --well always have a first «archived» empty folder explained in A

$ digikam --version
Qt: 3.3.6
KDE: 3.5.2
digiKam: 0.8.2-beta1

Thanks!

Regards,

--

-- 
Benjamí
(Continue reading)

Paul Sommer | 2 May 2006 02:32
X-Face
Picon
Favicon

No EXIF-Dater after auto rotation

>> starting from Version digikam_0.8.1-2_i386.deb, digikam deletes the
>> EXIF-Data from pictures.
>> When I download pictures from my camera all the photos that are in portrait
>> mode (thus rotated) does not have any EXIF-data. Landscape Pictures are OK.
>>
>> After reinstalling Ver. 0.8.0-1-1+b1 the EXIF-Data stays correct.

>Witch libexif you use. Have any error messages when you start digikam from a 
>console ?

In both the cases I use libexif12 Ver 0.6.13-4. libexif10 Ver 0.6.9-6 is also installed but seems not to be used

I Don't get any stating messages from both the versions.

When loading an image that has to be rotated the old version says:

digikam: Number of EXIF tags in IFD0 section:9
digikam: Wrote Image Orientation: 1
digikam: Wrote file '/media/Photos/2006-04 - Varchaa, Arun, Nina/.digikam-exifrotate-18429'.
digikam: WARNING: Trying to append a Metadata item for an unknown key (no ItemInfo): EXIF comment

The Exif-Data of thai picture ist there after rotation

When I process se same picture with the 8.1 Version it simply says:

digikam: No EXIF information found.

And the resulting picture is missing any Exif-Data.

Paul Sommer
(Continue reading)

Caulier Gilles | 2 May 2006 10:13
Favicon

Re: No EXIF-Dater after auto rotation

Le Mardi 02 Mai 2006 02:32 AM, Paul Sommer a écrit :
> >> starting from Version digikam_0.8.1-2_i386.deb, digikam deletes the
> >> EXIF-Data from pictures.
> >> When I download pictures from my camera all the photos that are in
> >> portrait mode (thus rotated) does not have any EXIF-data. Landscape
> >> Pictures are OK.
> >>
> >> After reinstalling Ver. 0.8.0-1-1+b1 the EXIF-Data stays correct.
> >
> >Witch libexif you use. Have any error messages when you start digikam from
> > a console ?
>
> In both the cases I use libexif12 Ver 0.6.13-4. libexif10 Ver 0.6.9-6 is
> also installed but seems not to be used
>
>
> I Don't get any stating messages from both the versions.
>
> When loading an image that has to be rotated the old version says:
>
> digikam: Number of EXIF tags in IFD0 section:9
> digikam: Wrote Image Orientation: 1
> digikam: Wrote file '/media/Photos/2006-04 - Varchaa, Arun,
> Nina/.digikam-exifrotate-18429'. digikam: WARNING: Trying to append a
> Metadata item for an unknown key (no ItemInfo): EXIF comment
>
> The Exif-Data of thai picture ist there after rotation
>
> When I process se same picture with the 8.1 Version it simply says:
>
(Continue reading)

Achim Bohnet | 2 May 2006 10:45
Picon
Favicon

Re: No EXIF-Dater after auto rotation

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 10:13, Caulier Gilles wrote:
> Le Mardi 02 Mai 2006 02:32 AM, Paul Sommer a écrit :
> > >> starting from Version digikam_0.8.1-2_i386.deb, digikam deletes the
> > >> EXIF-Data from pictures.
> > >> When I download pictures from my camera all the photos that are in
> > >> portrait mode (thus rotated) does not have any EXIF-data. Landscape
> > >> Pictures are OK.
> > >>
> > >> After reinstalling Ver. 0.8.0-1-1+b1 the EXIF-Data stays correct.
> > >
> > >Witch libexif you use. Have any error messages when you start digikam from
> > > a console ?
> >
> > In both the cases I use libexif12 Ver 0.6.13-4. libexif10 Ver 0.6.9-6 is
> > also installed but seems not to be used
> >
> >
> > I Don't get any stating messages from both the versions.
> >
> > When loading an image that has to be rotated the old version says:
> >
> > digikam: Number of EXIF tags in IFD0 section:9
> > digikam: Wrote Image Orientation: 1
> > digikam: Wrote file '/media/Photos/2006-04 - Varchaa, Arun,
> > Nina/.digikam-exifrotate-18429'. digikam: WARNING: Trying to append a
> > Metadata item for an unknown key (no ItemInfo): EXIF comment
> >
> > The Exif-Data of thai picture ist there after rotation
> >
> > When I process se same picture with the 8.1 Version it simply says:
(Continue reading)

Duncan Hill | 1 May 2006 18:39
Picon

Re: Minolta MRW RAW file parser...

Gilles Caulier wrote:

> I will commit the code in KDE svn trunk branch today, after to have passed a 
> lot of indeep tests.
> 
> Please Minolta users who uses digikam 0.9.0-svn, can you give me a feedback 
> during this week end. Thanks in advance...

Seems to work fairly well.  I'll see if I can do a comparison between 
the data it gets vs Dimage Master and Pixmantec's Rawshooter either this 
evening, or sometime this week.
Caulier Gilles | 2 May 2006 16:51
Favicon

Re: Minolta MRW RAW file parser...

Le Lundi 01 Mai 2006 06:39 PM, Duncan Hill a écrit :
> Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > I will commit the code in KDE svn trunk branch today, after to have
> > passed a lot of indeep tests.
> >
> > Please Minolta users who uses digikam 0.9.0-svn, can you give me a
> > feedback during this week end. Thanks in advance...
>
> Seems to work fairly well.  I'll see if I can do a comparison between
> the data it gets vs Dimage Master and Pixmantec's Rawshooter either this
> evening, or sometime this week.

Note that all Minolta marker notes :

http://www.dalibor.cz/minolta/index.htm
http://www.ozhiker.com/electronics/pjmt/jpeg_info/minolta_mn.html

... can be handle by the parser but cannot be displayed yet into digiKam 
interface duing a limitation in Exiv2. i'm currently working to a minolta 
makernote support in Exiv2 for that...

Gilles
Richard E Miles | 2 May 2006 22:46
Picon

digikam fails to delete pictures from Canon PowerShot A85

I have noticed that most of the time when I try to delete all the pictures from
the Canon PowerShot A85 camera that a popup window with failed to delete picture
occurs. Is this a problem with digikam for this type of camera or are other 
people experiencing this problem with other cameras? I have to use the camera to
delete the pictures.

--

-- 
Richard Miles
Federal Way WA. USA
registered linux user 46097
Fabrice Flore-Thebault | 5 May 2006 17:32
Gravatar

Re: digikam fails to delete pictures from Canon PowerShot A85

Le Mardi 2 Mai 2006 22:46, Richard E Miles a écrit :
> I have noticed that most of the time when I try to delete all the pictures
> from the Canon PowerShot A85 camera that a popup window with failed to
> delete picture occurs. Is this a problem with digikam for this type of
> camera or are other people experiencing this problem with other cameras? I
> have to use the camera to delete the pictures.

Don't know if it could help you :

I experienced such a problem with a broken CompactFlash card (in fact some 
kind of Microdrive made by Magicstore). The card was the problem, not the 
camera nor any card reader. 

Have you tried with another CF card ?

Do you have any CF reader you could use to test if the problem comes more from 
the card or from the camera ?

(Anyway, my point is that a (PCMIA or USB) card reader is definitively simpler 
and safer to use, and far more friendly for the camera batteries.)

--

-- 
Fabrice Flore-Thébault
Richard E Miles | 5 May 2006 22:39
Picon

Re: digikam fails to delete pictures from Canon PowerShot A85

On Fri, 5 May 2006 17:32:20 +0200
Fabrice Flore-Thebault <fab <at> centsix.org> wrote:

> Le Mardi 2 Mai 2006 22:46, Richard E Miles a écrit :
> > I have noticed that most of the time when I try to delete all the pictures
> > from the Canon PowerShot A85 camera that a popup window with failed to
> > delete picture occurs. Is this a problem with digikam for this type of
> > camera or are other people experiencing this problem with other cameras? I
> > have to use the camera to delete the pictures.
> 
> Don't know if it could help you :
> 
> I experienced such a problem with a broken CompactFlash card (in fact some 
> kind of Microdrive made by Magicstore). The card was the problem, not the 
> camera nor any card reader. 
>  
> Have you tried with another CF card ?
> 
> Do you have any CF reader you could use to test if the problem comes more from 
> the card or from the camera ?
> 
> (Anyway, my point is that a (PCMIA or USB) card reader is definitively simpler 
> and safer to use, and far more friendly for the camera batteries.)
> 
> -- 
> Fabrice Flore-Thébault
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users <at> kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
(Continue reading)

Caulier Gilles | 5 May 2006 23:46
Favicon

Re: digikam fails to delete pictures from Canon PowerShot A85

Le Vendredi 05 Mai 2006 10:39 PM, Richard E Miles a écrit :
> On Fri, 5 May 2006 17:32:20 +0200
>
> Fabrice Flore-Thebault <fab <at> centsix.org> wrote:
> > Le Mardi 2 Mai 2006 22:46, Richard E Miles a écrit :
> > > I have noticed that most of the time when I try to delete all the
> > > pictures from the Canon PowerShot A85 camera that a popup window with
> > > failed to delete picture occurs. Is this a problem with digikam for
> > > this type of camera or are other people experiencing this problem with
> > > other cameras? I have to use the camera to delete the pictures.
> >
> > Don't know if it could help you :
> >
> > I experienced such a problem with a broken CompactFlash card (in fact
> > some kind of Microdrive made by Magicstore). The card was the problem,
> > not the camera nor any card reader.
> >
> > Have you tried with another CF card ?
> >
> > Do you have any CF reader you could use to test if the problem comes more
> > from the card or from the camera ?
> >
> > (Anyway, my point is that a (PCMIA or USB) card reader is definitively
> > simpler and safer to use, and far more friendly for the camera
> > batteries.)
> >
> > --
> > Fabrice Flore-Thébault
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
(Continue reading)


Gmane