1 Apr 02:16
Re: Dealing with Proper Motion in extended catalogs
Jason Harris <kstars <at> 30doradus.org>
2008-04-01 00:16:15 GMT
2008-04-01 00:16:15 GMT
Hello, I meant to weigh in earlier. I think James's solution to store high PM stars in multiple trixel-files is the way to go. It gives us an elegant and bulletproof solution to a problem that would otherwise require a lot of complex code to work around. +- 10,000 years should be no problem at all. I would be surprised if more than a handful of users notice. If pressed, we could also just stop painting faint stars if the date drifts outside the +- 10,000 year interval, and pop up a KMessageBox explaining why (with a "Don't show again" checkbox). regards, Jason On Mar 31, 2008, at 2:52 AM, James Bowlin wrote: > On Mon March 31 2008, Akarsh Simha wrote: >> Hi James, >> >>> When we create the files of stars ordered by position >>> and then brightness, I propose that we include high PM stars in >>> multiple lists so that if any trixel crossed by the 20,000 year >>> line is visible, we are sure the star will be displayed. >> >> I don't understand this part. Could you elaborate? > > The reason proper motion causes a problem is because it causes stars > to move from one trixel to another. For example, imagine if we are(Continue reading)
RSS Feed