1 Dec 2002 03:50
RE: [Issue N11069] Questioin about qt cygwin port
<qt-bugs <at> trolltech.com>
2002-12-01 02:50:01 GMT
2002-12-01 02:50:01 GMT
Hi, > Okay, I have looked where this MACRO is used and have added > Q_OS_CYGWIN in such > places, so I don't need Q_OS_LINUX. Great! > > Why use a separate Q_OS_CYGWIN_WIN32 macro? If the Win32 calls are > > really needed I don't mind > > Performance reasons. > > > Are there really serious performance problems? Can't they be > > considered > > Cygwin problems that could be fixed in upcoming releases if they are > > reported? > > > Yes, cygwin in general has performance problems with file io, which I > have > inspected some month ago, but was unable to fix.(Continue reading)It may be that > there are > some guys in the future, who are able to fix this, but in the > meantime, > especially for kde on cygwin, this patches are necessary to ensure a > minimum > performance. I see.
It may be that
> there are
> some guys in the future, who are able to fix this, but in the
> meantime,
> especially for kde on cygwin, this patches are necessary to ensure a
> minimum
> performance.
I see.
Ralf
Each sycoca entry starts with a
type-id that identifies the kind of object that follows. See the KST_ enum in
ksycocatype.h
294919 is clearly not a valid type. Somehow you have corruption in your sycoca
database.
Cheers,
Waldo
RSS Feed