ante | 2 Mar 2003 14:43
Picon

Re: Everaldo

Did you try kde-look.org? 

On Friday 28 February 2003 23:42, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> I have been trying to get in contact with Everaldo for some time (including
> email to the address listed on his site), but he never replied. Could
> someone on this list please either a) tell me how to actually contact him,
> or b) maybe just help me out so he doesn't have to:
>
> I am looking for *older* versions of the Crystal icons. Specifically, I
> would like them in a format suitable for editing and manipulating, such as
> XCF, SVG, or even PSD, but if those are no longer available I'd still like
> to see the PNGs. (Basically I would like to have copies of the *basic
> elements* of them, for example the paintcan 'emblem' on the icon for a
> picture folder, but without the folder part.)
>
> I have been after these for quite some time and, although I have some of
> the older sets in PNG form, I haven't been able to find them in more
> convenient formats; nor did I ever find all the ones I want.
>
> Perhaps someone could help me out. Did Everaldo (or anyone else) archive
> these files somewhere along the line? Are they still available?
>
> Thanks!

--

-- 

Cordialemente,

Ante

(Continue reading)

ante | 2 Mar 2003 14:55
Picon

Re: Use of kdelibs-3.1/pics/crystalsvg/crsc-app-openoffice.svgz

On Friday 28 February 2003 19:48, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I missed finding that license in the archive.  So the LGPL with the
> add-on is consistent for OpenOffice.org.

yes. 

>
> If at all possible, I would still like to hear from the particular artist
> who created this icon just so that I know that he/she is okay with its use
> for OpenOffice.org.

Changes are Everaldo or Torsten made the icon. They are both on this list. 

>
> Even with the compatible license, I would not want to use something whose
> author personally did not like or approve of.

You asked it on the list that is the main platform, the license is ok. Well, 
if the author is too busy, use it. Many e-mails seem to go unanswered here, 
don't be shy, go ahead. Use of icons by others is OK. 

Cordialemente,

Ante

******

http://home.uwnet.nl/~vita
(Continue reading)

Torsten Rahn | 2 Mar 2003 15:20
Picon
Favicon

Re: Use of kdelibs-3.1/pics/crystalsvg/crsc-app-openoffice.svgz


I answered his mail in private stating that I am the author and that
permission in accordance to the LGPL is granted.

Torsten Rahn

----- Original Message -----
From: "ante" <vitanova <at> softhome.net>
To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <kevin.hendricks <at> sympatico.ca>;
<kde-artists <at> mail.kde.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: K-ARTIST:Use of
kdelibs-3.1/pics/crystalsvg/crsc-app-openoffice.svgz

> On Friday 28 February 2003 19:48, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry I missed finding that license in the archive.  So the LGPL with
the
> > add-on is consistent for OpenOffice.org.
>
> yes.
>
> >
> > If at all possible, I would still like to hear from the particular
artist
> > who created this icon just so that I know that he/she is okay with its
use
> > for OpenOffice.org.
>
(Continue reading)

Eric Christopherson | 4 Mar 2003 01:21
Favicon

Re: Everaldo

On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:43:09PM +0100, ante wrote:
> Did you try kde-look.org? 

Yes.

--

-- 
Furrfu!		r a k k o  at  c h a r t e r  dot  n e t
Alexander Kellett | 6 Mar 2003 10:17
Picon
Favicon

full set of 'crystal'ized icons for 3.2?

hiya all,

i noticed that the icons for open in 
filemanager and open in terminal are not 
in crystal style, and there are several
icons bugs on the artwork section in
bugs.kde.org. 

therefore, i was wondering, are the icon
creators much too busy currently, or is
the list of missing crystalized icons
likely to diminish by 3.2?

mvg,
Alex wishing he had enough time to learn to draw icons :(

(p.s please cc: me as i'm not subscribed to the list)
Avi Alkalay | 10 Mar 2003 20:26

New ScreenSaver

If I have new screen saver to contrib to the kdeartwork package, this is the
list I should talk to?
How can I upload new code to the CVS? Shoul I use KDE 3.2, 3.1 or 3.0 CVS
version?

Thank you,
Avi
Martin Konold | 21 Mar 2003 15:16
Picon

Re: KDE Website Beta Layout

Am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 00:23 schrieb Sebastian Faubel:

Hi Sebastian,

> here's my latest development snapshot of the KDE Frontpage.
> Anyone who's interested can modify it and send me her/his modifications,
> ideas and comments.

I very much like your ideas! What about making the the sub categories more 
"keramik-like"? With this I mean rounded corners...

Regards,
-- martin

Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold

e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959
email: martin.konold <at> erfrakon.de
Christoph Cullmann | 21 Mar 2003 22:58
Picon

Re: KDE Website Beta Layout


On Friday 21 March 2003 15:16, Martin Konold wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 00:23 schrieb Sebastian Faubel:
>
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> > here's my latest development snapshot of the KDE Frontpage.
> > Anyone who's interested can modify it and send me her/his modifications,
> > ideas and comments.
>
> I very much like your ideas! What about making the the sub categories more
> "keramik-like"? With this I mean rounded corners...
We allready use his design, yeah, what we now have is a cripled down version 
of that. And btw., that mail was written months ago and never reached that 
list ://////

--

-- 
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Co-Maintainer
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann <at> kde.org
Eric Christopherson | 22 Mar 2003 08:38
Favicon

Very delayed messages

I just noticed something odd... just yesterday, I received two messages sent
to this list from everaldo, whose dates were both Oct. 25 of 2002. They
showed up as "new" messages, and sure enough, the header shows that they
were delivered to my computer on Mar. 20, 2003. Anyone know what's going on?

--

-- 
Furrfu!		r a k k o  at  c h a r t e r  dot  n e t
luciash d' being | 22 Mar 2003 13:44
Picon

Re: Very delayed messages

maybe because of the total size of messages... they were not accepted by the 
list maintainer until yesterday? :/

Dne so 22. března 2003 07:38 Eric Christopherson napsal(a):
> I just noticed something odd... just yesterday, I received two messages
> sent to this list from everaldo, whose dates were both Oct. 25 of 2002.
> They showed up as "new" messages, and sure enough, the header shows that
> they were delivered to my computer on Mar. 20, 2003. Anyone know what's
> going on?

--

-- 

:.. :.: ::: :
luciash [graun]d' being :.:::.::. ::.:::  :: ::    :  :.:.::
simply just an( )other web designer? :::::.::.:.:::.:::  :.: :
l u c i  <at>  s h . g r o u n d . c z ::.:::..:::.::.::.::  :.  ::
c. p#one ++ 420 777 777 590 :::.::::..::.:::  ::    : :.: ::      
http://luci.skinbase.org ::.:::...:.: :  .::  ::.: ::   :::
:.. :.: ::: :

Gmane