Re: 4.7.2 Compile Times Vs. 4.0.16
Max Carlson <max@...
2010-07-01 18:44:08 GMT
We're happy to help you track down datapath issues - just send us a
On 6/25/10 8:47 AM, Ryan M wrote:
> Well, have about 73 compiled in resources but they aren't large images.
> It may be a moot point as I'm seeing some compilation stability issues
> with 4.8 and datapaths. Could be back to 4.0.16 for us.
> On 6/25/2010 9:52 AM, Raju Bitter wrote:
>> Ryan, do you compile a lot of resources into the SWF file? I've been
>> working on Flex projects where we had a lot of resources compiled into
>> the app, and the compilation could take up to 3-4 minutes. Generally
>> the Flex compiler is much slower than the OpenLaszlo compiler for the
>> SWF8 runtime. I've heard of Flex projects with compile times going to
>> up 8 minutes.
>> - Raju
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Henry
>> Minsky<hminsky@...> wrote:
>>> It's definitely going to be slower to compile swf10, because we're doing
>>> some preprocessing and then invoking the flex compiler. I'd like to
>>> out where the time is going, at the least how much is being spent in the
>>> flex compiler vs the LZX phase.