Neo Jia | 16 Nov 2006 04:33
Picon
Gravatar

How to checkout the openJDK read-only SVN?

hi,

Where can I register my USERNAME for this SVN as a read-only user? I cannot checkout the code from the SVN repository.

Thanks,
Neo
--
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!

Glyn Normington | 16 Nov 2006 18:08
Picon
Favicon

Mercurial or subversion?


Mark Reinhold wrote ([1]) that OpenJDK would use Mercurial, but it is
currently using subversion.

Was there a change of direction or should we expect a migration to
Mercurial in the coming months?

BTW I like subversion and would be happy if it stayed put.

Glyn

[1] http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/openjdk_scm

Leo User | 16 Nov 2006 18:46
Picon
Favicon

Re: Mercurial or subversion?


--- Glyn Normington <glyn_normington@...>
wrote:

> 
> Mark Reinhold wrote ([1]) that OpenJDK would use
> Mercurial, but it is
> currently using subversion.
> 
> Was there a change of direction or should we expect
> a migration to
> Mercurial in the coming months?
> 
> BTW I like subversion and would be happy if it
> stayed put.
> 
> Glyn
> 
> [1] http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/openjdk_scm
> 

I read at the open-jdk irc that they only have an
internal mercurial repository set up for testing at
this time.  Im skeptical that it will remain
subversion since it seems to have been poo-pooed
because of the difficulties/inefficiencies of doing
distributed development... or something like that.  Im
sure someone will correct me on this. :)

leouser

 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link

Compare mortgage rates for today. 
Get up to 5 free quotes. 
Www2.nextag.com

James Melvin | 16 Nov 2006 19:09
Picon

Re: Mercurial or subversion?

I believe the plan of record is to migrate to Mercurial.  A subversion
repository will be available until we can switch over.

- Jim

Glyn Normington wrote:
> Mark Reinhold wrote ([1]) that OpenJDK would use Mercurial, but it is
> currently using subversion.
> 
> Was there a change of direction or should we expect a migration to
> Mercurial in the coming months?
> 
> BTW I like subversion and would be happy if it stayed put.
> 
> Glyn
> 
> [1] http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/openjdk_scm

Leo User | 16 Nov 2006 23:58
Picon
Favicon

Where does jtreg fit into the big picture?

Hi,

I was taking a gander at jtreg and saw that its how
you run the tests for the compiler.  Is this going to
be the tool that will be used for all testing of JDK
components as they become available?  I see there's a
mailing list for it specifically so Im going to take a
mad guess and say yes.

leouser

 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link

Don't quit your job - take classes online
www.Classesusa.com

Neo Jia | 17 Nov 2006 00:06
Picon
Gravatar

Bug database for openJDK project

hi,

Following the link "How to contribute to the openJDK project", I found the bug database under the category of "java". It seems that not all of them are related to the openJDK. Some of them are about jdk 1.7, right?

How can I filter out those projects, which are not in the open source scope?

Thanks,
Neo

--
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!

David Herron | 17 Nov 2006 00:07
Picon

Re: Where does jtreg fit into the big picture?


Well, the harness choice has been a long-running debate inside our team 
for a long time.  For whatever it's worth we have several different 
harnesses in use.

The jtreg harness is largely used by the SE development groups for the 
unit and regression tests.  The JCK team has its own harness (Java Test) 
from which jtreg is derived.  You may have seen the jtharness project 
that just launched a day or two ago on java.net.  The quality team has 
our own harness we call Tonga.

I don't know if there is a set plan of record (yet) regarding an 
official test harness.  My opinion is this could be a topic of 
discussion whether there should be an "official" test harness, and if so 
what it should be, what the requirements are, etc.

- David Herron

Leo User wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was taking a gander at jtreg and saw that its how
> you run the tests for the compiler.  Is this going to
> be the tool that will be used for all testing of JDK
> components as they become available?  I see there's a
> mailing list for it specifically so Im going to take a
> mad guess and say yes.
>
> leouser
>
>   

Leo User | 17 Nov 2006 00:12
Picon
Favicon

Re: Bug database for openJDK project


--- Neo Jia <neojia@...> wrote:

> hi,
> 
> Following the link "How to contribute to the openJDK
> project", I found the
> bug database under the category of "java". It seems
> that not all of them are
> related to the openJDK. Some of them are about jdk
> 1.7, right?
> 
> How can I filter out those projects, which are not
> in the open source scope?
> 
> Thanks,
> Neo
> 
> -- 
> I would remember that if researchers were not
> ambitious
> probably today we haven't the technology we are
> using!
> 

do you mean this lovely bug database?
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/index.jsp

leouser

 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link

Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. 
$510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment! 
www.LowerMyBills.com/lre

Neo Jia | 17 Nov 2006 00:15
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Bug database for openJDK project

Right. I get the bug database following the link https://openjdk.dev.java.net/contribute.html

Thanks,
Neo

On 11/16/06, Leo User <leouser126-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

--- Neo Jia <neojia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> hi,
>
> Following the link "How to contribute to the openJDK
> project", I found the
> bug database under the category of "java". It seems
> that not all of them are
> related to the openJDK. Some of them are about jdk
> 1.7, right?
>
> How can I filter out those projects, which are not
> in the open source scope?
>
> Thanks,
> Neo
>
> --
> I would remember that if researchers were not
> ambitious
> probably today we haven't the technology we are
> using!
>

do you mean this lovely bug database?
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/index.jsp

leouser



____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link

Mortgage rates near 39yr lows.
$510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment!
www.LowerMyBills.com/lre



--
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!

Gmane