12 Jun 2006 05:56
Re: plugin proposal
Milos Kleint <mkleint <at> gmail.com>
2006-06-12 03:56:59 GMT
2006-06-12 03:56:59 GMT
ping On 6/12/06, Brett Porter <brett <at> apache.org> wrote: > re: commit rights, you have to request it from the xircles interface and > then ping the list to get a despot to accept/reject. > > - Brett > > Milos Kleint wrote: > > I don't have commit rights to the mojo repository yet (I suppose at least) > > I've done a few releases on the mevenide site already, my plan was to > > re-release the last one, so that it gets into the mojo's remote > > repository.. > > > > > > Milos > > > > > > On 6/10/06, Kris Bravo <kris.bravo <at> corridor-software.us> wrote: > >> I imagine if you already have access to the sandbox you can check the > >> code in there. The benefit of attaching to a ticket is peer review, but > >> once you release an alpha you will get that anyway. > >> > >> Good luck! > >> > >> > >> On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 20:24 +0200, Milos Kleint wrote: > >> > What is the result? is it a go? And what's next? > >> > Shall I file an issue and attach the sources of the plugin with it? > >> > Since I have the plugin at codehaus as well, is it possible just(Continue reading)
Brett Porter a écrit :
> shorter answer: nobody has scp access to codehaus :)
>
> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>> short answer: it's over http and can be use with firewalls
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Grzegorz Slowikowski a écrit :
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I don't know webdav technology, but can you tell me
>>> shortly, what are the webdav adventages compared to scp
>>> deployment?
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "jerome lacoste"
>>> <jerome.lacoste <at> gmail.com>
>>> To: <dev <at> mojo.codehaus.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:29 AM
>>> Subject: [mojo-dev] migrating mojo project to webdav
>>>
>>>
>>>> I start working on migrating the mojo project to webdav.
>>>>
>>>> Will send a summary later on.
>>>>
RSS Feed