User's list for jMock, a library for testing Java code using mock objects

Ashutosh Kumar | 13 Sep 2011 06:46

expects returns a default value for void return type

I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get error stating

java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)

expectations:

allowed, never invoked: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>); returns a default value

Here is my test :

public void testsaveUsers() {

try {

final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{

setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);

}};

final BrmUserBoImpl userBo = context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);

final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();

BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new BrmUserServiceImpl();

userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);

context.checking(new Expectations() {

{

allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);

}

});

userService.saveUser(user);

} catch (Exception e) {

fail();

}

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

headers

Fedor Bobin | 13 Sep 2011 07:14

Re: expects returns a default value for void return type

What jmock version do you use?
Is userService.saveUser() create or use threads?

2011/9/13 Ashutosh Kumar <Ashutosh.Kumar-YELz9hDmLZ5yjigaA7mwwQ@public.gmane.org>

I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get error stating

java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)

expectations:

allowed, never invoked: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>); returns a default value

Here is my test :

public void testsaveUsers() {

            try {

                  final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{

                    setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);

                }};

                  final BrmUserBoImpl userBo = context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);

                  final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();

                  BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new BrmUserServiceImpl();

                  userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);

                  context.checking(new Expectations() {

                        {

                              allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);



                        }

                  });

                  userService.saveUser(user);

            } catch (Exception e) {

                  fail();

            }

      }

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

headers

Ashutosh Kumar | 13 Sep 2011 07:16

RE: expects returns a default value for void return type

I am using 2.5.1 . It does not create any thread. Implementation classes use spring for dependency injection.

Thanks

Ashutosh

From: Fedor Bobin [mailto:fuudtorrentsru-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:45 AM
To: user-sXN/XchZ9OexIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [jmock-user] expects returns a default value for void return type

What jmock version do you use?
Is userService.saveUser() create or use threads?

2011/9/13 Ashutosh Kumar <Ashutosh.Kumar-YELz9hDmLZ5yjigaA7mwwQ@public.gmane.org>

I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get error stating

java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)

expectations:

allowed, never invoked: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>); returns a default value

Here is my test :

public void testsaveUsers() {

try {

final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{

setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);

}};

final BrmUserBoImpl userBo = context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);

final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();

BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new BrmUserServiceImpl();

userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);

context.checking(new Expectations() {

{

allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);

}

});

userService.saveUser(user);

} catch (Exception e) {

fail();

}

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

headers

Ashutosh Kumar | 13 Sep 2011 09:46

Re: expects returns a default value for void return type

Probably it is happening with transactional methods. Do I need to do something extra for transactional methods?

Thanks

Ashutosh

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Ashutosh Kumar <Ashutosh.Kumar-YELz9hDmLZ5yjigaA7mwwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

I am using 2.5.1 . It does not create any thread. Implementation classes use spring for dependency injection.

Thanks

Ashutosh

From: Fedor Bobin [mailto:fuudtorrentsru-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:45 AM
To: user <at> jmock.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [jmock-user] expects returns a default value for void return type

What jmock version do you use?
Is userService.saveUser() create or use threads?

2011/9/13 Ashutosh Kumar <Ashutosh.Kumar-YELz9hDmLZ4WUB6XyBwvMA@public.gmane.orgin>

I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get error stating

java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)

expectations:

allowed, never invoked: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>); returns a default value

Here is my test :

public void testsaveUsers() {

            try {

                  final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{

                    setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);

                }};

                  final BrmUserBoImpl userBo = context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);

                  final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();

                  BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new BrmUserServiceImpl();

                  userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);

                  context.checking(new Expectations() {

                        {

                              allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);



                        }

                  });

                  userService.saveUser(user);

            } catch (Exception e) {

                  fail();

            }

      }

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

headers

Fedor Bobin | 13 Sep 2011 09:51

Re: expects returns a default value for void return type

May be you can separate test and some classes so we can discover what is wrong.

2011/9/13 Ashutosh Kumar <ashutosh.k78 <at> gmail.com>

Probably it is happening with transactional methods. Do I need to do something extra for transactional methods?

Thanks

Ashutosh

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Ashutosh Kumar <Ashutosh.Kumar-YELz9hDmLZ5yjigaA7mwwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

I am using 2.5.1 . It does not create any thread. Implementation classes use spring for dependency injection.

Thanks

Ashutosh

From: Fedor Bobin [mailto:fuudtorrentsru-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:45 AM
To: user <at> jmock.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [jmock-user] expects returns a default value for void return type

What jmock version do you use?
Is userService.saveUser() create or use threads?

2011/9/13 Ashutosh Kumar <Ashutosh.Kumar-YELz9hDmLZ4WUB6XyBwvMA@public.gmane.orgin>

I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get error stating

java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)

expectations:

allowed, never invoked: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>); returns a default value

Here is my test :

public void testsaveUsers() {

            try {

                  final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{

                    setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);

                }};

                  final BrmUserBoImpl userBo = context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);

                  final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();

                  BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new BrmUserServiceImpl();

                  userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);

                  context.checking(new Expectations() {

                        {

                              allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);



                        }

                  });

                  userService.saveUser(user);

            } catch (Exception e) {

                  fail();

            }

      }

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

headers

Steve Freeman | 13 Sep 2011 13:06

Re: expects returns a default value for void return type

What about the equals() method on the brmUserBo? Is it not matching because of that? 

Incidentally, I wouldn't use a try/catch here. If you just declare the exception on the test method and let
it propagate up, junit will handle it appropriately.

S.

On 13 Sep 2011, at 06:46, Ashutosh Kumar wrote:
> I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get error stating
> 
> java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)
> expectations:
>  allowed, never invoked:
brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>); returns a default value
> 
> Here is my test :
> 
> public void testsaveUsers() {
>            try {
>                  final  Mockery context = new  JUnit4Mockery()  {{
>                    setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);
>                }};
>                  final BrmUserBoImpl userBo = context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);
>                  final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();
>                  BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new BrmUserServiceImpl();
>                  userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);
>                  context.checking(new Expectations() {
>                        {
>                              allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);
> 
>                        }
>                  });
>                  userService.saveUser(user);
>            } catch (Exception e) {
>                  fail();
>            }
>      }

Steve Freeman

Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006
Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com

+44 797 179 4105
Twitter:  <at> sf105
Higher Order Logic Limited
Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. 
Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

headers

Ashutosh Kumar | 13 Sep 2011 13:09

Re: expects returns a default value for void return type

There is no equal method defined there. Moreever it works for getUser. It fails for save.

Thanks

Ashutosh

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Steve Freeman <steve-/6t1Ty3A97Vaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> wrote:

What about the equals() method on the brmUserBo? Is it not matching because of that?

Incidentally, I wouldn't use a try/catch here. If you just declare the exception on the test method and let it propagate up, junit will handle it appropriately.

S.

On 13 Sep 2011, at 06:46, Ashutosh Kumar wrote:
> I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get error stating
>
> java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)
> expectations:
> allowed, never invoked: brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>); returns a default value
>
> Here is my test :
>
> public void testsaveUsers() {
> try {
> final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{
> setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);
> }};
> final BrmUserBoImpl userBo = context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);
> final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();
> BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new BrmUserServiceImpl();
> userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);
> context.checking(new Expectations() {
> {
> allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);
>
> }
> });
> userService.saveUser(user);
> } catch (Exception e) {
> fail();
> }
> }

Steve Freeman

Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006
Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com

+44 797 179 4105
Twitter: <at> sf105
Higher Order Logic Limited
Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ.
Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

headers

Ignat Zapolsky | 13 Sep 2011 13:11

Re: expects returns a default value for void return type

Do you mind posting code of BrmUserServiceImpl here?

On 13 Sep 2011 12:09, "Ashutosh Kumar" <ashutosh.k78-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> There is no equal method defined there. Moreever it works for getUser. It
> fails for save.
>
> Thanks
> Ashutosh
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Steve Freeman <steve-/6t1Ty3A97Vaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> What about the equals() method on the brmUserBo? Is it not matching because
>> of that?
>>
>> Incidentally, I wouldn't use a try/catch here. If you just declare the
>> exception on the test method and let it propagate up, junit will handle it
>> appropriately.
>>
>> S.
>>
>> On 13 Sep 2011, at 06:46, Ashutosh Kumar wrote:
>> > I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get
>> error stating
>> >
>> > java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation:
>> brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)
>> > expectations:
>> > allowed, never invoked:
>> brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>);
>> returns a default value
>> >
>> > Here is my test :
>> >
>> > public void testsaveUsers() {
>> > try {
>> > final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{
>> > setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);
>> > }};
>> > final BrmUserBoImpl userBo =
>> context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);
>> > final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();
>> > BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new
>> BrmUserServiceImpl();
>> > userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);
>> > context.checking(new Expectations() {
>> > {
>> > allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);
>> >
>> > }
>> > });
>> > userService.saveUser(user);
>> > } catch (Exception e) {
>> > fail();
>> > }
>> > }
>>
>> Steve Freeman
>>
>> Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006
>> Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com
>>
>> +44 797 179 4105
>> Twitter: <at> sf105
>> Higher Order Logic Limited
>> Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ.
>> Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>

headers

Ashutosh Kumar | 13 Sep 2011 13:13

RE: expects returns a default value for void return type

<at> Transactional(readOnly = false)

public void saveUser(BrmUser user) {

brmUserBo.saveUser(user);

}

From: Ignat Zapolsky [mailto:izapolsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 4:41 PM
To: user <at> jmock.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [jmock-user] expects returns a default value for void return type

Do you mind posting code of BrmUserServiceImpl here?

On 13 Sep 2011 12:09, "Ashutosh Kumar" <ashutosh.k78 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> There is no equal method defined there. Moreever it works for getUser. It
> fails for save.
>
> Thanks
> Ashutosh
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Steve Freeman <steve <at> m3p.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> What about the equals() method on the brmUserBo? Is it not matching because
>> of that?
>>
>> Incidentally, I wouldn't use a try/catch here. If you just declare the
>> exception on the test method and let it propagate up, junit will handle it
>> appropriately.
>>
>> S.
>>
>> On 13 Sep 2011, at 06:46, Ashutosh Kumar wrote:
>> > I have a method which returns void . However when I run the test I get
>> error stating
>> >
>> > java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation:
>> brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>)
>> > expectations:
>> > allowed, never invoked:
>> brmUserBo.saveUser(<com.arisglobal.agBRM.user.entity.BrmUser <at> 16672d6>);
>> returns a default value
>> >
>> > Here is my test :
>> >
>> > public void testsaveUsers() {
>> > try {
>> > final Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery() {{
>> > setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);
>> > }};
>> > final BrmUserBoImpl userBo =
>> context.mock(BrmUserBoImpl.class);
>> > final BrmUser user = new BrmUser();
>> > BrmUserServiceImpl userService = new
>> BrmUserServiceImpl();
>> > userService.setBrmUserBo(userBo);
>> > context.checking(new Expectations() {
>> > {
>> > allowing(userBo).saveUser(user);
>> >
>> > }
>> > });
>> > userService.saveUser(user);
>> > } catch (Exception e) {
>> > fail();
>> > }
>> > }
>>
>> Steve Freeman
>>
>> Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006
>> Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com
>>
>> +44 797 179 4105
>> Twitter: <at> sf105
>> Higher Order Logic Limited
>> Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ.
>> Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>

Disclaimer: This transmission, including attachments, is confidential, proprietary, and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and you are hereby advised that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this transmission, or any of the information included therein, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply and permanently delete all copies of this transmission and its attachments.

headers

Steve Freeman | 13 Sep 2011 13:14

Re: expects returns a default value for void return type

Do you /have/ to use the class imposteriser? Perhaps there's some more complicated behaviour going on there?

S.

On 13 Sep 2011, at 13:09, Ashutosh Kumar wrote:

> There is no equal method defined there. Moreever it works for getUser. It
> fails for save.
> 
> Thanks
> Ashutosh

Steve Freeman

Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006
Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com

+44 797 179 4105
Twitter:  <at> sf105
Higher Order Logic Limited
Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. 
Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30

2	April 2013
1	February 2013
5	December 2012
28	November 2012
1	October 2012
14	September 2012
2	July 2012
8	June 2012
8	May 2012
4	April 2012
3	March 2012
1	February 2012
18	January 2012
10	November 2011
15	September 2011
6	July 2011
8	June 2011
1	May 2011
1	January 2011
1	November 2010
7	October 2010
18	September 2010
20	August 2010
3	July 2010
6	March 2010
6	February 2010
4	January 2010
13	December 2009
15	November 2009
39	October 2009
23	September 2009
19	August 2009
15	July 2009
35	June 2009
24	May 2009
52	April 2009
41	March 2009
25	February 2009
13	January 2009
28	December 2008
50	November 2008
11	October 2008
19	September 2008
41	August 2008
80	July 2008
46	June 2008
44	May 2008
50	April 2008
69	March 2008
29	February 2008
85	January 2008
33	December 2007
48	November 2007
115	October 2007
82	September 2007
88	August 2007
83	July 2007
65	June 2007
37	May 2007
49	April 2007
30	March 2007
15	February 2007
20	May 2006
49	April 2006
69	March 2006
78	February 2006
103	January 2006
21	December 2005
78	November 2005
15	October 2005
80	September 2005
8	August 2005
24	July 2005
71	June 2005
38	May 2005