headers
Andrew Purtell (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 01:50
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Created: (HBASE-2278) TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch

TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: HBASE-2278
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278
             Project: Hadoop HBase
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
             Fix For: 0.20.4

My tests have picked up a regression on branch:

Error Message

i=101 expected:<1000> but was:<0>

Stacktrace

junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: i=101 expected:<1000> but was:<0>
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion.testWritesWhileGetting(TestHRegion.java:2085)

--

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Andrew Purtell (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 01:52
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Updated: (HBASE-2278) TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-2278:
----------------------------------

    Description: 
My tests have picked up a regression on branch:

test:
     [echo] contrib: indexed
...
    [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes
    [junit] Tests run: 41, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18.382 sec
    [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes FAILED

Error Message

i=101 expected:<1000> but was:<0>

Stacktrace

junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: i=101 expected:<1000> but was:<0>
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion.testWritesWhileGetting(TestHRegion.java:2085)

  was:
My tests have picked up a regression on branch:

Error Message
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Andrew Purtell (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 01:52
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Updated: (HBASE-2278) [indexed] TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-2278:
----------------------------------

    Summary: [indexed] TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch 
(was: TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch)

> [indexed] TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2278
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.20.4
>
>
> My tests have picked up a regression on branch:
> test:
>      [echo] contrib: indexed
> ...
>     [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes
>     [junit] Tests run: 41, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18.382 sec
>     [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes FAILED
> Error Message
> i=101 expected:<1000> but was:<0>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Andrew Purtell (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 02:06
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-2278) [indexed] TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839513#action_12839513
] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-2278:
---------------------------------------

It looks like what happens occasionally is the previous test, TestHRegionWithIdxRegion, will not
terminate but instead spin on one CPU indefinitely, causing the following test
TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes to return unexpected results. 

> [indexed] TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2278
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.20.4
>
>
> My tests have picked up a regression on branch:
> test:
>      [echo] contrib: indexed
> ...
>     [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes
>     [junit] Tests run: 41, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18.382 sec
>     [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes FAILED
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Andrew Purtell (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 02:26
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Resolved: (HBASE-2257) [stargate] multiuser mode


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-2257.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Forgot to close this out.

> [stargate] multiuser mode
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2257
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2257
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.20.4
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-2257.patch
>
>
> Support an optional operating mode with simple user isolation.

--

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Andrew Purtell (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 02:28
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Resolved: (HBASE-1690) [stargate] http basic authentication support


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-1690.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

For simple basic authentication, the servlet container suffices. For more fine grained stuff, that falls
under HBASE-1697.

> [stargate] http basic authentication support
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1690
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1690
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Support a simple access control mechanism via HTTP basic authentication.  Allow definition of
authorized users and assignment of ACLs to those users backed by an HBase table. A first cut might just be to
control table accesses -- a user will either be allowed any access to a table or nothing. Subsequently,
supporting the granting or revocation of various combinations of create, update, read, and delete
privileges on tables or column families can be considered. 

--

--
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Nicolas Spiegelberg (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 02:30
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-2234) Roll Hlog if any datanode in the write pipeline dies


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839522#action_12839522
] 

Nicolas Spiegelberg commented on HBASE-2234:
--------------------------------------------

 <at> ryan I could go a couple ways with rebindWriterFunc().  I either need the "this" pointer to set
"this.hdfs_out", in which case I don't need to explicitly pass in any params since it's always
"this.writer".  Or I could return an OutputStream and make this function static.  I'm new to Java from an
embedded C++ background; but to me it look like this is 6 of one, half-dozen of the other.  I have a couple
internal comments about this diff I may need to apply as well, so I'll roll that change into my next diff.

> Roll Hlog if any datanode in the write pipeline dies
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2234
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2234
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: dhruba borthakur
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 0.20.4, 0.21.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-2234-20.4.patch
>
>
> HDFS does not replicate the last block of a file that is being written to. This means that is datanodes in the
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
ryan rawson (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 04:57
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-1845) Discussion issue for multi calls, MultiDelete, MultiGet and MultiPut


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839548#action_12839548
] 

ryan rawson commented on HBASE-1845:
------------------------------------

you should work this against the branch for 0.20.4 - will will introduce HBASE-2219 to the branch and allow
the addition of methods in patches from now on.  So aim for the branch and we can get it in for 0.20.4 - sounds good?

> Discussion issue for multi calls, MultiDelete, MultiGet and MultiPut
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1845
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Erik Holstad
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>         Attachments: batch.patch, hbase-1845_0.20.3.patch, multi-v1.patch
>
>
> I've started to create a general interface for doing these batch/multi calls and would like to get some
input and thoughts about how we should handle this and what the protocol should
> look like. 
> First naive patch, coming soon.

--

--
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dan Washusen (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 06:01
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-2278) [indexed] TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839550#action_12839550
] 

Dan Washusen commented on HBASE-2278:
-------------------------------------

I've just run the build three times without a failure.  I'll keep trying but if someone sees this again could
you please provide a thread dump?

> [indexed] TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes.testWritesWhileGetting failing on branch
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2278
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2278
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.20.4
>
>
> My tests have picked up a regression on branch:
> test:
>      [echo] contrib: indexed
> ...
>     [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes
>     [junit] Tests run: 41, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18.382 sec
>     [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithIdxRegionNoIndexes FAILED
> Error Message
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Matthias Lehmann (JIRA | 1 Mar 2010 10:57
Picon
Favicon

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-2272) put with timestamp after delete is not stored


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839625#action_12839625
] 

Matthias Lehmann commented on HBASE-2272:
-----------------------------------------

I made a terribly stupid mistake: I was used to think of timestamps of seconds since epoch time (python uses
floats to express milliseconds) but HBase uses Longs of millisenconds since epoch time. So obviously, my
explicit timestamps lay way back in the past, which is why the put with timestamp was shadowed by the delete.

Sorry that I took so much of you time - larsgeorge and jdcryans.

> put with timestamp after delete is not stored
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2272
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2272
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.3
>            Reporter: Matthias Lehmann
>
> When I delete a row and afterwards put a value for that row again, I can not get it (so apparently it was not
stored), but only, when I put the value with a timestamp.
> A flush of the table between delete and put bypasses the problem.
> I give a hbase-shell log as an example.
> Lets assume, we have a table 'foo' with a column-familiy 's:':
> The Error
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane