Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.2 Release
How about trying to upgrade trunk first and then backport to 2.1.2 if
all goes well....
-Donald
Jason Warner wrote:
> We might want to think about updating derby. I believe we skipped over
> updating to previous releases because of a bug. See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3545 for details. The
> issue is fixed in both the 10.3.3.0 <http://10.3.3.0> release and the
> 10.4.1.3 <http://10.4.1.3> release. I haven't really looked at them, so
> I don't know much about new functionality, but our current derby version
> is over 2 years old. Any thoughts?
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@...
> <mailto:joe.bohn@...>> wrote:
>
> One more thing for 2.1.2 would be to upgrade to MyFaces 1.2.3.
> <http://1.2.3.> I helped them verify this via the Geronimo TCK so I
> don't anticipate any problems.
>
> What other projects are at newer versions that we should consider
> picking up for a 2.1.2 release?
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> Hey Kevan,
>
> I agree that it would be nice to get a 2.1.2 release out soon.
> I've seen a number of duplicate JIRAs reported that are already
> fixed in 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT.
>
> some more comments inline ...
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>
> Not a whole lot of discussion, so far. I'm going to leave
> this open a while longer... Hoping we can see a few more
> opinions voiced.
>
> To date, we have identified the following non-server related
> work items:
>
> 1) New JavaMail release to pick up the recent fixes -- I
> totally agree. Happy to see the cooperation between the
> Geronimo and James projects. Do we think we're at a
> reasonable point for a new JavaMail release?
>
> +1 ... agree that it would be good to get a javamail release and
> pick it up in 2.1.2. <http://2.1.2.>
>
> 2) GEP 2.1.2 that supports Eclipse Ganymede -- I'd like to
> see this also. However, I don't think this is a GEP
> discussion and need not occur prior to our server release
> discussion.
>
> Agree .. this doesn't really impact a server 2.1.2 release.
>
> 3) TranQL Oracle RAC connector -- would be nice to see. Do
> we have an expectation on when this could be provided?
> 4) Release DayTrader 2.1 -- I'd like to see this, also.
> Anybody willing to work on making this happen? I don't think
> that this is a hard requirement for a 2.1.2 release.
>
> I expect this would be independent of a 2.1.2 server release.
>
> 5) Samples -- We're currently discussing a release of our
> samples. I'd certainly expect that our samples will work on
> 2.1.2 and expect that we'll test and verify this.
>
> Hopefully this will be the case, but at the moment the samples
> are still tied to a specific server release. However, I think
> the samples issue can be handled independent of a 2.1.2 server
> release.
>
>
> One additional fixes that I'd like to see:
>
> GERONIMO-4131 Identifies an issue with our RA deployment. I
> think we should get this fixed.
>
> There may be others. Will take a look at the Jira's.
>
> Any Release Manager volunteers?
>
>
> Since this is still fresh in my mind from 2.1.1 I would be
> willing to act as the Release Manager again for 2.1.2 if there
> are no other volunteers.
>
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Jason Warner
RSS Feed