Lasantha Ranaweera | 1 Feb 02:41 2007

Re: Geronimo v1.2 Web services sample

Hernan,

Thanks for pointing out this issue. Looks like we definitely have a case
here. Please verify the error you are getting as same given below.

After you have mentioned I tested this sample application in both Jetty &
Tomcat version of the server for 1.1.1 & trunk version (built recently)
but not in 1.2. The client side of the application fails in the Jetty
version of the server with following error for each case for me too:(. The
interesting thing is it works fine for Tomcat version.

AxisFault
 faultCode: {http://xml.apache.org/axis/}HTTP
 faultSubcode:
 faultString: (404)Not Found
 faultActor:
 faultNode:
 faultDetail:
        {}:return code:  404
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1"/>
<title>Error 404 </title>
</head>
<body><h2>HTTP ERROR:
404</h2><pre>NOT_FOUND</pre>
<p>RequestURI=//Calculator/calculator</p><p><i><small><a
href="http://jetty.mortbay.org/">Powered by
Jetty://</a></small></i></p><br/>
(Continue reading)

David Blevins | 1 Feb 03:00 2007

Re: [all] jarfiles in svn

Going to crank these out now, expect to see some votes for them.

-David

On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> So I don't forget, some commons projects need JDK 1.3 compiled  
> versions of some of our J2EE 1.4 specs, so at some when I get a  
> spare cycle I plan to build and put those up for a vote.
>
> -David
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: David Blevins <david.blevins@...>
>> Date: January 10, 2007 11:27:41 AM PST
>> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons- 
>> dev@...>
>> Subject: Re: [all] jarfiles in svn
>> Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons- 
>> dev@...>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>>
>>> David Blevins <david.blevins <at> visi.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Only passively reading the thread, but from some of the comments  
>>>> and
(Continue reading)

Prasad Kashyap | 1 Feb 04:09 2007
Picon

Re: svn commit: r501969 - /geronimo/samples/trunk/pom.xml

The project did not inherit from genesis' project-config because I
could not prevent it from inheriting all the reports. I tried using
<excludeDefaults> for the maven-project-info-plugin and that didn't
work too.

Now I have it extending from project-config but I have to exclude all
other unwanted reports by setting their inherited=false.

Cheers
Prasad

On 1/31/07, Jason Dillon <jason@...> wrote:
> Any reason why this is extending 'genesis' and not 'project-config'?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:58 AM, prasad@... wrote:
>
> > Author: prasad
> > Date: Wed Jan 31 11:58:44 2007
> > New Revision: 501969
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=501969
> > Log:
> > * set parent to org.apache.geronimo.genesis:genesis
> >
> > Modified:
> >     geronimo/samples/trunk/pom.xml
> >
(Continue reading)

Paul McMahan | 1 Feb 04:37 2007
Picon

Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?

I built from core/branches/jsf12

Best wishes,
Paul

On 1/31/07, Don Hill <justj2ee@...> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ?
>
> Don
>
>
> On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@...> wrote:
> > I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
> > apache project.   I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
> > very little trouble (just disabled unit tests).   Then I included
> > their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
> > to Geronimo.   The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
> > faces-config.xml and started the webapp.   I was able to access the
> > webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls.   I think
> > that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
> > we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
> > On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <sppatel2@...> wrote:
> > > Yes, I think we should consider this.  From what I hear its been weeks
> since
(Continue reading)

David Blevins | 1 Feb 04:48 2007

[vote] Release geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.1

All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as  
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.

I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.

  Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ 
branches/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.1
  Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/ 
apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec/1.1.1/

Here's my +1

-David

David Blevins | 1 Feb 04:49 2007

[vote] Release geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.1

All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as  
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.

I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.

  Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ 
branches/geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.1
  Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/ 
apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec/1.1.1/

Here's my +1

-David

David Blevins | 1 Feb 04:49 2007

[vote] Release geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.1

All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3 as  
requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.

I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.

  Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ 
branches/geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.1
  Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/ 
apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec/1.1.1/


Here's my +1

-David

Kevan Miller | 1 Feb 05:33 2007
Picon

Re: [vote] Release geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.1

Looks good.

+1

--kevan

On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3  
> as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
>  Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ 
> branches/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.1
>  Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/ 
> apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec/1.1.1/
>
> Here's my +1
>
> -David

Lin Sun | 1 Feb 05:33 2007
Picon

url-pattern issue continues

Hi there,

Continue the discussion in a new thread (without Axis2 in the title) as the
questions are not specific to web services. :-)

1) I tried to run a test where a user didn't specify servlet-mapping for the
jaxws test servlet and that didn't go well.  (BTW, this is allowed per JSR
109).  How is the web container handling the cases where servlet-mapping
isn't specified by the user.  Would the container set the url-pattern to a
default value? Can someone shed some light on that?

2) We had to have an asterisk ("*") in the url-pattern (e.g. /servlet/*) of
the jaxws test servlet.  I tried to remove the * but I would get 404 when I
issue ?wsdl from the browser.  I think this is something we may have to
write code to work around the spec requirement, as a user needs to be able
to run ?wsdl calls using different syntax (like GreeterImpl?wsdl or
test?wsdl...).   For example, a user can only specify 1 (or 0)
servlet-mapping and url-pattern for one servlet in web.xml, but the Axis2
integration code can add other url-patterns to the web deployment plan that
will be used by the web container. I am wondering if there is anyway to
overwrite the in-memory version of servlet-mapping or url-pattern for
Geronimo to use (of course, don't overwrite the original web.xml)?  Any
pointer is appreciated!

Thanks, Lin

Reference doc:
JSR 109 rev 1.2 Page 61 (sec 7.1.2) where it says:
--//--
Servlet Mapping. A developer may optionally specify a servlet-mapping, In
(Continue reading)

Kevan Miller | 1 Feb 05:34 2007
Picon

Re: [vote] Release geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.1

+1

--kevan
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:49 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3  
> as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
>
> I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
>
>  Release Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ 
> branches/geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.1
>  Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/ 
> apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec/1.1.1/
>
> Here's my +1
>
> -David


Gmane