19 Dec 01:22
Re: Jeep is a trademark of Chrysler
IANAL, but the facts remain. The word "Jeep" is not a word in any other context but that used to define the WWII General Purpose military vehicle and its derivatives. Except perhaps as a character in Popeye comics. My point is that the word is contrived, not a part of standard vocabulary. At Dictionary.com it's defined as "A trademark used for a civilian motor vehicle." So the principle below is beside the point. As intellectual property, that particular word is not a part of the public domain and cannot be used. Like "Frisbee" brand flying discs and "Kleenex" brand facial tissues, "Jeep" is not applicable to any other usage. -- N. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike" <apache@...> To: <geronimo-dev@...> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:06 PM Subject: Re: Jeep is a trademark of Chrysler > The principle to trademark infringement is whether it creates > confusion in the marketplace. "Jeep" is a widely recognized trademark > in this country, and has been applied to non-vehicular, "lifestyle" > products, I believe, though nothing like an app server! So there's > potential for confusion, but it's arguable. And we have enough to > argue about right now.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed