Jean-Jacques Parent (JIRA | 30 Jul 10:58 2014
Picon

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6525) LDAP realm userSearchMatching filter


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14079084#comment-14079084
] 

Jean-Jacques Parent commented on GERONIMO-6525:
-----------------------------------------------

Take care : the andpercent amp; is converted in the description field for the config.xml sample. Edit the
description field to see the original text...

> LDAP realm userSearchMatching filter
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-6525
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6525
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.1
>         Environment: Windows server 2003
> JDK1.7.0_60
>            Reporter: Jean-Jacques Parent
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Get problem when using such property in a ldap securityrealm:
> in the console : userSearchMatching=(&(sAMAccountName={0})(objectclass=user))
>  in the config.xml : userSearchMatching=(&(sAMAccountName\={0})(objectclass\=user))
> - used to work with geronimo 2
(Continue reading)

Jean-Jacques Parent (JIRA | 30 Jul 10:48 2014
Picon

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6525) LDAP realm userSearchMatching filter

Jean-Jacques Parent created GERONIMO-6525:
---------------------------------------------

             Summary: LDAP realm userSearchMatching filter
                 Key: GERONIMO-6525
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6525
             Project: Geronimo
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: public (Regular issues)
          Components: security
    Affects Versions: 3.0.1
         Environment: Windows server 2003
JDK1.7.0_60
            Reporter: Jean-Jacques Parent
            Priority: Minor

Get problem when using such property in a ldap securityrealm:
in the console : userSearchMatching=(&(sAMAccountName={0})(objectclass=user))
 in the config.xml : userSearchMatching=(&(sAMAccountName\={0})(objectclass\=user))

- used to work with geronimo 2
- get error with geronimo 3 
javax.naming.directory.InvalidSearchFilterException: Unbalanced parenthesis; remaining name 'dc=brucity,dc=be'
	at com.sun.jndi.ldap.Filter.findRightParen(Filter.java:694)
	at com.sun.jndi.ldap.Filter.encodeFilterList(Filter.java:733)
	at com.sun.jndi.ldap.Filter.encodeComplexFilter(Filter.java:657)
	at com.sun.jndi.ldap.Filter.encodeFilter(Filter.java:104)
	at com.sun.jndi.ldap.Filter.encodeFilterString(Filter.java:74)
	at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapClient.search(LdapClient.java:547)
	at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.doSearch(LdapCtx.java:1985)
(Continue reading)

Jean-Jacques Parent (JIRA | 30 Jul 10:26 2014
Picon

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-5663) Geronimo compatibility with windows 2008


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jean-Jacques Parent closed GERONIMO-5663.
-----------------------------------------

       Resolution: Done
    Fix Version/s: 2.0.1

Works on windows server 2008
Whatever you can choose between jdk 32b or 64b

> Geronimo compatibility with windows 2008
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-5663
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5663
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Jacques Parent
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.1
>
>
> Not a bug but a question
> Can't find in any documentation if Geronimo 2.0 is compatible with windows 2008- 64 bits.
(Continue reading)

Jean-Jacques Parent (JIRA | 30 Jul 10:24 2014
Picon

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-4906) DB connection problem


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jean-Jacques Parent closed GERONIMO-4906.
-----------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.0.1

Out of date
No problem since c3p0 and Oracle 11g

> DB connection problem
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-4906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4906
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: databases
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>         Environment: Geronimo running on Windows server 2003 (Virtual Machine)
> Oracle 10g
> Driver jdbc 10.2.0.1
> Spring-Version: 2.0.2
> Hibernate-Version: 3.2.0.cr4
>            Reporter: Jean-Jacques Parent
>             Fix For: 2.0.1
(Continue reading)

Sameer Mahajan (JIRA | 29 Jul 13:27 2014
Picon

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6524) 2014-07-29 10:17:21,233 ERROR [AbstractEncryption] Unable to decrypt java.io.EOFException doing deploy


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sameer Mahajan updated GERONIMO-6524:
-------------------------------------

    Description: 
I am required to deploy geromino and daytrader application on CentOS 6.4 using only command line
utilities. I am able to install geromino alright, and compile the daytrader app fine. However when I run
the deploy command I get the following error:

2014-07-29 11:26:00,435 ERROR [DeployTool] Error: 
org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Login Failed
	at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.cli.OnlineServerConnection.tryToConnect(OnlineServerConnection.java:126)
	at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.cli.OnlineServerConnection.<init>(OnlineServerConnection.java:75)
	at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.cli.OnlineServerConnection.<init>(OnlineServerConnection.java:50)
	at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.cli.DeployTool.execute(DeployTool.java:167)
	at org.apache.geronimo.system.main.MainBridge.execute(MainBridge.java:64)
	at org.apache.geronimo.main.Bootstrapper.start(Bootstrapper.java:88)
	at org.apache.geronimo.main.Bootstrapper.execute(Bootstrapper.java:61)
	at org.apache.geronimo.cli.AbstractCLI.executeMain(AbstractCLI.java:65)
	at org.apache.geronimo.cli.deployer.DeployerCLI.main(DeployerCLI.java:32)

the geromino log shows the error of:

2014-07-29 10:17:21,233 ERROR [AbstractEncryption] Unable to decrypt
java.io.EOFException
        at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream.java:2303)
        at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.readShort(ObjectInputStream.java:2772)
(Continue reading)

Sameer Mahajan (JIRA | 29 Jul 13:22 2014
Picon

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6524) 2014-07-29 10:17:21,233 ERROR [AbstractEncryption] Unable to decrypt java.io.EOFException doing deploy

Sameer Mahajan created GERONIMO-6524:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: 2014-07-29 10:17:21,233 ERROR [AbstractEncryption] Unable to decrypt java.io.EOFException
doing deploy
                 Key: GERONIMO-6524
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6524
             Project: Geronimo
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: public (Regular issues)
    Affects Versions: 3.0.1
            Reporter: Sameer Mahajan

--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

xiezhi (JIRA | 24 Jul 08:36 2014
Picon

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6470) Enable the tomcat feature to Modify Apache-Coyote/1.1 Banner


    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14072891#comment-14072891
] 

xiezhi commented on GERONIMO-6470:
----------------------------------

Could anyone help me to check and commit it? Thanks.

> Enable the tomcat feature to Modify Apache-Coyote/1.1 Banner
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-6470
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6470
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: Tomcat
>    Affects Versions: 1.x
>            Reporter: xiezhi
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: ModifyBanner.patch
>
>
> In Response Headers, it exposure the version number of the Apache Tomcat Web Server which runs on port 8080
by default.
> We hope to modify the TomcatWebConnector'attribute server to protect this information.
> I think the good pratice is below.
> In <geronimo-home>\var\config\config.xml
(Continue reading)

Romain Manni-Bucau | 23 Jul 18:23 2014
Picon

[RESULT][VOTE] geronimo javamail 1.8.4

The vote got 5+1s (3 bindings) so it passed :)

Thank you all for the votes, I'll pushed binaries on central just after this mail.

PS: any other action needed?


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: <at> rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-07-23 15:31 GMT+02:00 Jarek Gawor <jgawor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
+1

Jarek

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rmannibucau-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I'd like to call a vote for geronimo javamail 1.8.4
>
> It mainly fixes a bug for pop3 protocol where INBOX was replaced by INPUT in
> our code (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6523)
>
> Here is the staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1002/
>
> vote will be opened for 3 days or until 3 pmc votes are obtained as usually.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: <at> rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau

sangeeta lal | 20 Jul 18:19 2014
Picon

Application Logging Practices in Industrial and Open-Source Software

Dear Geronimo Team,


Application Logging Practices in Industrial and Open-Source Software


I am a PhD scholar at a state university at India working in the area of mining software repositories and empirical software engineering. I am currently working on a project to study developer logging practices in industrial and open-source software. Following is a link to a short survey (about 1 minute to complete). Your response will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.



Take a minute to improve state of the art of software development.

Thank You
--
 
Regards...
Sangeeta
Assistant Professor
CSE Department <at> JIIT Noida
Romain Manni-Bucau | 20 Jul 09:40 2014
Picon

[VOTE] geronimo javamail 1.8.4

Hi guys

I'd like to call a vote for geronimo javamail 1.8.4

It mainly fixes a bug for pop3 protocol where INBOX was replaced by INPUT in our code (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6523)


vote will be opened for 3 days or until 3 pmc votes are obtained as usually.


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: <at> rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA | 20 Jul 09:39 2014
Picon

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6523) javamail pop folder doesn't consider INBOX exists?


     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Romain Manni-Bucau updated GERONIMO-6523:
-----------------------------------------

    Component/s: mail

> javamail pop folder doesn't consider INBOX exists?
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-6523
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6523
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: mail
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> Hi
> didn't check that much but org.apache.geronimo.javamail.store.pop3.POP3Folder#POP3Folder states:
> "The name of the folder.  Note that POP3 stores only
>      *               have 2 real folders, the root ("") and the in-basket
>      *               ("INBOX")."
> as javadoc but implements:
> {code}
>         if (name.equalsIgnoreCase("INPUT")) {
>             exists = true; 
>         }
> {code}
> (root case is handled in a subclass correctly)
> Shouldn't this INPUT be INBOX?

--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)


Gmane