[rules-dev] Rules Modelling with UML

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Re: [rules-dev] Rules Modelling with UML

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Re: [rules-dev] Rules Modelling with UML

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

[rules-dev] Problem in running rules file from command line

I am facing some problem when i am trying to do this. I am new to JBoss can
anybody please help me.

In a folder i copied HelloWorldExample.java & HelloWorld.drl and changed the
code to eliminate the package line
Next i changed the classpath and include different jar files required for
rule like drools-core.jar, ....
Compilation was absolutely fine
but when i am going to run the program the error is :
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundException .  Didn't get it why this exception is
coming.

I want to run the java file from command line like in this was javac
HelloWorldExample not from eclipse.

Please help me

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-in-running-rules-file-from-command-line-tf3512269.html#a9809498
Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Re: [rules-dev] Rules Modelling with UML

Hi,
The OMG Production Rule Represation (PRR) aims to standardize a business 
rule formalism independently of any rule engine. The OMG PRR is at the 
Platform Independent Level (PIM) of the Model Driven Architecture (MDA) 
will offer a MOF instance of a rule formalism (UML). The OMG has 
requested a proposal until 2003 and at this moment no real submission 
exist. As related work, the Rule Interchange Format (RIF) exist at the 
W3C. The W3C work on rule formalsm is planed in 2 phases. The first 
phase will be terminated in November 2007. Before OMG PRR and W3C RIF 
other tentatives have existed like RuleML, Common Rules (IBM)  Simple 
Rule (ILOG).
Actually it does not exist any standard rule formalism in UML and this 
make late the adoption of business rule approach because you have note a 
flexible way to migrate your rules into another rule engine format (loke 
JRules to JBoss Rules or JBoss Rules to Jess and so one).
In a project what we have done is to create our one rule formalism in 
UML and uses models transformation to transforme our rules to the 
selected rule engine.
Mouhamed Diouf

Mark Proctor a écrit :
> You have OMG PRR, but I don't know much about that.
>
> Mark
> Michael Neale wrote:
>> nothing specific - I remember reading somethign in the dim dark past, 
>> but I would have no more success then what a google search offers I 
>> am afraid.
>>
>> On 4/2/07, * Javier Chamizo Aguado* <chaminet <at> gmail.com 
>> <mailto:chaminet <at> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hello all,
>>      
>>     I am looking for references about ways of modelling business
>>     rules in UML but dont find anything.
>>      
>>     Could anyone give a hint about where and what to look for?
>>      
>>     Thank you very much
>>      
>>                Javier
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-dev mailing list
>>     rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

[rules-dev] drools-eclipse

Just a reminder that I have refactored the eclipse stuff and there are 
now four directories.under drools-eclipse, drools-ide no long exists.
drools-eclipse-plugin
drools-eclipse-feature
drools-eclipse-test
drools-eclipse-test-feature

We are gradually fully automating and customising maven so the top level 
build.xml will be killed off. soon, and most likely no longer works. 
However ant is still used to build the documentation and the eclipse 
plugin, it is just integrated into the mavne lifecycle using the antrun 
plugin.

We will continue include the engine, eclipse and brms in the same build 
system for now as the project is quite fluid and we need close 
co-operation. In the future, when the engine api and language features 
mature, we may look at seperating brms and eclipse, or atleast the brms, 
so that they baseline with a specific version of the engine release, 
this will allow projects to do releases on their own.

I have automed the eclipse plugin build, although still trying to get 
the unit tests automated, and that is now part of the maven life cycle. 
Edson is currently investigating having the various ant and manfiest 
files having their information populated from maven - i.e. dependencies 
and version info.

drools-eclipse is now activated as a profile, using the eclipse.home 
settings, this is part of the automation process and the libs will not 
be copied across unless you do this.
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip -Declipse.home=c:\java\eclipse install

The following classes have commented out tests, can I ask who ever is 
responsible for them to sort this out. I want to get the eclipse 
automation and testing ship shape, which will make things easier for the 
future.
IncompleteParsingTest
ReteooLayoutFactoryTest
RuleContentOutlineTest

Mark
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Re: [rules-dev] drools-eclipse

Also not only are many tests commented out, but most tests fail, would 
be good if we can sort this out.

Mark
Mark Proctor wrote:
> Just a reminder that I have refactored the eclipse stuff and there are 
> now four directories.under drools-eclipse, drools-ide no long exists.
> drools-eclipse-plugin
> drools-eclipse-feature
> drools-eclipse-test
> drools-eclipse-test-feature
>
> We are gradually fully automating and customising maven so the top 
> level build.xml will be killed off. soon, and most likely no longer 
> works. However ant is still used to build the documentation and the 
> eclipse plugin, it is just integrated into the mavne lifecycle using 
> the antrun plugin.
>
> We will continue include the engine, eclipse and brms in the same 
> build system for now as the project is quite fluid and we need close 
> co-operation. In the future, when the engine api and language features 
> mature, we may look at seperating brms and eclipse, or atleast the 
> brms, so that they baseline with a specific version of the engine 
> release, this will allow projects to do releases on their own.
>
> I have automed the eclipse plugin build, although still trying to get 
> the unit tests automated, and that is now part of the maven life 
> cycle. Edson is currently investigating having the various ant and 
> manfiest files having their information populated from maven - i.e. 
> dependencies and version info.
>
> drools-eclipse is now activated as a profile, using the eclipse.home 
> settings, this is part of the automation process and the libs will not 
> be copied across unless you do this.
> mvn -Dmaven.test.skip -Declipse.home=c:\java\eclipse install
>
> The following classes have commented out tests, can I ask who ever is 
> responsible for them to sort this out. I want to get the eclipse 
> automation and testing ship shape, which will make things easier for 
> the future.
> IncompleteParsingTest
> ReteooLayoutFactoryTest
> RuleContentOutlineTest
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Re: [rules-dev] Rules Modelling with UML

Hi all,

On Tue, Apr 3, 2007, Diouf Mouhamed <diouf <at> labri.fr> said:

> Hi,
> The OMG Production Rule Represation (PRR) aims to standardize a business 
> rule formalism independently of any rule engine. The OMG PRR is at the 
> Platform Independent Level (PIM) of the Model Driven Architecture (MDA) 
> will offer a MOF instance of a rule formalism (UML). The OMG has 
> requested a proposal until 2003 and at this moment no real submission 
> exist. As related work, the Rule Interchange Format (RIF) exist at the 
> W3C. The W3C work on rule formalsm is planed in 2 phases. The first 
> phase will be terminated in November 2007. Before OMG PRR and W3C RIF 
> other tentatives have existed like RuleML, Common Rules (IBM)  Simple 
> Rule (ILOG).
> Actually it does not exist any standard rule formalism in UML 
When you say standard you probably refer to OMG or?
and this 
> make late the adoption of business rule approach because you have note a 
> flexible way to migrate your rules into another rule engine format (loke 
> JRules to JBoss Rules or JBoss Rules to Jess and so one).
I am interested in any available interchange system/translator. Are you
aware about such software? Can you indicate a trial or demo?

I suggest you to consult the REWERSE I1 Working Group web page
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/ ). Here you'll find:
1. A visual language for modeling rules, URML
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=URML )
2. An interchange format, R2ML
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=R2ML).
3. A number of translators for rule interchange
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=translators )
4. A web Service for rules interchange
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=ws )
5. A visual modeling tool Strelka
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=strelka)
> In a project what we have done is to create our one rule formalism in 
> UML and uses models transformation to transforme our rules to the 
> selected rule engine.
Can you help me on that? I am very interested in this formalism.
> Mouhamed Diouf

All the best,
Adrian Giurca
> 
> Mark Proctor a écrit :
>> You have OMG PRR, but I don't know much about that.
>>
>> Mark
>> Michael Neale wrote:
>>> nothing specific - I remember reading somethign in the dim dark past, 
>>> but I would have no more success then what a google search offers I 
>>> am afraid.
>>>
>>> On 4/2/07, * Javier Chamizo Aguado* <chaminet <at> gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:chaminet <at> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hello all,
>>>      
>>>     I am looking for references about ways of modelling business
>>>     rules in UML but dont find anything.
>>>      
>>>     Could anyone give a hint about where and what to look for?
>>>      
>>>     Thank you very much
>>>      
>>>                Javier
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     rules-dev mailing list
>>>     rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>   
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>   
> 
> 

--

-- 

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Re: [rules-dev] Rules Modelling with UML

Hi all,

On Tue, Apr 3, 2007, Diouf Mouhamed <diouf <at> labri.fr> said:

> Hi,
> The OMG Production Rule Represation (PRR) aims to standardize a business 
> rule formalism independently of any rule engine. The OMG PRR is at the 
> Platform Independent Level (PIM) of the Model Driven Architecture (MDA) 
> will offer a MOF instance of a rule formalism (UML). The OMG has 
> requested a proposal until 2003 and at this moment no real submission 
> exist. As related work, the Rule Interchange Format (RIF) exist at the 
> W3C. The W3C work on rule formalsm is planed in 2 phases. The first 
> phase will be terminated in November 2007. Before OMG PRR and W3C RIF 
> other tentatives have existed like RuleML, Common Rules (IBM)  Simple 
> Rule (ILOG).
> Actually it does not exist any standard rule formalism in UML 
When you say standard you probably refer to OMG or?
and this 
> make late the adoption of business rule approach because you have note a 
> flexible way to migrate your rules into another rule engine format (loke 
> JRules to JBoss Rules or JBoss Rules to Jess and so one).
I am interested in any available interchange system/translator. Are you
aware about such software? Can you indicate a trial or demo?

I suggest you to consult the REWERSE I1 Working Group web page
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/ ). Here you'll find:
1. A visual language for modeling rules, URML
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=URML )
2. An interchange format, R2ML
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=R2ML).
3. A number of translators for rule interchange
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=translators )
4. A web Service for rules interchange
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=ws )
5. A visual modeling tool Strelka
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=strelka)
> In a project what we have done is to create our one rule formalism in 
> UML and uses models transformation to transforme our rules to the 
> selected rule engine.
Can you help me on that? I am very interested in this formalism.
> Mouhamed Diouf

All the best,
Adrian Giurca
> 
> Mark Proctor a écrit :
>> You have OMG PRR, but I don't know much about that.
>>
>> Mark
>> Michael Neale wrote:
>>> nothing specific - I remember reading somethign in the dim dark past, 
>>> but I would have no more success then what a google search offers I 
>>> am afraid.
>>>
>>> On 4/2/07, * Javier Chamizo Aguado* <chaminet <at> gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:chaminet <at> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hello all,
>>>      
>>>     I am looking for references about ways of modelling business
>>>     rules in UML but dont find anything.
>>>      
>>>     Could anyone give a hint about where and what to look for?
>>>      
>>>     Thank you very much
>>>      
>>>                Javier
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     rules-dev mailing list
>>>     rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>   
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>   
> 
> 

--

-- 

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Re: [rules-dev] Rules Modelling with UML

Hi all,

On Tue, Apr 3, 2007, Diouf Mouhamed <diouf <at> labri.fr> said:

> Hi,
> The OMG Production Rule Represation (PRR) aims to standardize a business 
> rule formalism independently of any rule engine. The OMG PRR is at the 
> Platform Independent Level (PIM) of the Model Driven Architecture (MDA) 
> will offer a MOF instance of a rule formalism (UML). The OMG has 
> requested a proposal until 2003 and at this moment no real submission 
> exist. As related work, the Rule Interchange Format (RIF) exist at the 
> W3C. The W3C work on rule formalsm is planed in 2 phases. The first 
> phase will be terminated in November 2007. Before OMG PRR and W3C RIF 
> other tentatives have existed like RuleML, Common Rules (IBM)  Simple 
> Rule (ILOG).
> Actually it does not exist any standard rule formalism in UML 
When you say standard you probably refer to OMG or?
and this 
> make late the adoption of business rule approach because you have note a 
> flexible way to migrate your rules into another rule engine format (loke 
> JRules to JBoss Rules or JBoss Rules to Jess and so one).
I am interested in any available interchange system/translator. Are you
aware about such software? Can you indicate a trial or demo?

I suggest you to consult the REWERSE I1 Working Group web page
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/ ). Here you'll find:
1. A visual language for modeling rules, URML
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=URML )
2. An interchange format, R2ML
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=R2ML).
3. A number of translators for rule interchange
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=translators )
4. A web Service for rules interchange
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=ws )
5. A visual modeling tool Strelka
(http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=strelka)
> In a project what we have done is to create our one rule formalism in 
> UML and uses models transformation to transforme our rules to the 
> selected rule engine.
Can you help me on that? I am very interested in this formalism.
> Mouhamed Diouf

All the best,
Adrian Giurca
> 
> Mark Proctor a écrit :
>> You have OMG PRR, but I don't know much about that.
>>
>> Mark
>> Michael Neale wrote:
>>> nothing specific - I remember reading somethign in the dim dark past, 
>>> but I would have no more success then what a google search offers I 
>>> am afraid.
>>>
>>> On 4/2/07, * Javier Chamizo Aguado* <chaminet <at> gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:chaminet <at> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hello all,
>>>      
>>>     I am looking for references about ways of modelling business
>>>     rules in UML but dont find anything.
>>>      
>>>     Could anyone give a hint about where and what to look for?
>>>      
>>>     Thank you very much
>>>      
>>>                Javier
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     rules-dev mailing list
>>>     rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>   
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>   
> 
> 

--

-- 

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev