headers
Marcio Ribeiro | 2 Jun 19:13
Picon

Build Not required

Hi,
my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option, when the build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout appear two messages:
 
is project up to date?
Build Not required
Build Not required



What's happening???

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill@...
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |
headers
Eric Minick | 2 Jun 19:51

Re: Build Not required

Marcio,

The logic in the build manager works like this (in psuedo code):

checkoutProject();

revisionList = getRevisions();

if (revisionList.isEmpty()) {
   log( "Build Not required")
}

if (build.isForced() OR revisionList.isNotEmpty()) {
   build();
}
else {
   log("Build Not Required);
}

So if you are seeing two "Build Not Required" messages, it is because 
there are no revisions and the build was not flagged as being forced. 
Currently, the schedules do not support always forcing builds which may 
be the source of your problem. Scheduled builds are always managed by 
the presence of revisions. Ad hoc builds may be forced though.

-- Eric

I found the double Build Not Required messages a bit confusing and not 
terribly useful. I've gone ahead and changed the first to simply be, "No 
revisions detected".

Marcio Ribeiro wrote:

> Hi,
> my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option, when the 
> build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout appear two 
> messages:
>  
> is project up to date?
> Build Not required
> Build Not required
>
>
>
> What's happening???
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill@...
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>  
>
Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |
headers
Marcio Ribeiro | 2 Jun 20:54
Picon

Re: Build Not required

but now I've added blank lines on a java source file and commited, changing the revision...   the scheduled build still doesnt work.

On 6/2/06, Eric Minick <etm-SVNIZWSJOcJl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Marcio,

The logic in the build manager works like this (in psuedo code):

checkoutProject();

revisionList = getRevisions();

if (revisionList.isEmpty()) {
   log( "Build Not required")
}

if (build.isForced() OR revisionList.isNotEmpty()) {
   build();
}
else {
   log("Build Not Required);
}

So if you are seeing two "Build Not Required" messages, it is because
there are no revisions and the build was not flagged as being forced.
Currently, the schedules do not support always forcing builds which may
be the source of your problem. Scheduled builds are always managed by
the presence of revisions. Ad hoc builds may be forced though.

-- Eric

I found the double Build Not Required messages a bit confusing and not
terribly useful. I've gone ahead and changed the first to simply be, "No
revisions detected".



Marcio Ribeiro wrote:

> Hi,
> my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option, when the
> build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout appear two
> messages:
>
> is project up to date?
> Build Not required
> Build Not required
>
>
>
> What's happening???
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill@...
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
gnugy | 2 Jun 23:48
Favicon

Re: [Bulk] Re: Build Not required

Are you by any chance using the SubversionRepositoryAdapter?  If you are 
I had the same problem a few months back that boiled down to a problem with
a regular expression in the getRevisionsSince() method.  If this is the 
case post back here and I'll dig up the expression that should fix things.

-- Philip.

Marcio Ribeiro wrote:

> but now I've added blank lines on a java source file and commited, 
> changing the revision...   the scheduled build still doesnt work.
>
> On 6/2/06, *Eric Minick * <etm@... 
> <mailto:etm@...>> wrote:
>
>     Marcio,
>
>     The logic in the build manager works like this (in psuedo code):
>
>     checkoutProject();
>
>     revisionList = getRevisions();
>
>     if (revisionList.isEmpty()) {
>        log( "Build Not required")
>     }
>
>     if (build.isForced() OR revisionList.isNotEmpty()) {
>        build();
>     }
>     else {
>        log("Build Not Required);
>     }
>
>     So if you are seeing two "Build Not Required" messages, it is because
>     there are no revisions and the build was not flagged as being forced.
>     Currently, the schedules do not support always forcing builds
>     which may
>     be the source of your problem. Scheduled builds are always managed by
>     the presence of revisions. Ad hoc builds may be forced though.
>
>     -- Eric
>
>     I found the double Build Not Required messages a bit confusing and not
>     terribly useful. I've gone ahead and changed the first to simply
>     be, "No
>     revisions detected".
>
>
>
>     Marcio Ribeiro wrote:
>
>     > Hi,
>     > my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option,
>     when the
>     > build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout
>     appear two
>     > messages:
>     >
>     > is project up to date?
>     > Build Not required
>     > Build Not required
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > What's happening???
>     >
>     >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >Anthill mailing list
>     >Anthill@... <mailto:Anthill@...>
>     >http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>     <http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>
>     >
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Anthill mailing list
>     Anthill@... <mailto:Anthill@...>
>     http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill@...
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>  
>
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Eric Minick | 3 Jun 00:36

Re: [Bulk] Re: Build Not required

Thanks for the reminder on that one Philip, I think knowing the 
repository adapter in use would be helpful regardless of what it is.

-- Eric

gnugy wrote:

> Are you by any chance using the SubversionRepositoryAdapter?  If you 
> are I had the same problem a few months back that boiled down to a 
> problem with
> a regular expression in the getRevisionsSince() method.  If this is 
> the case post back here and I'll dig up the expression that should fix 
> things.
>
> -- Philip.
>
> Marcio Ribeiro wrote:
>
>> but now I've added blank lines on a java source file and commited, 
>> changing the revision...   the scheduled build still doesnt work.
>>
>> On 6/2/06, *Eric Minick * <etm@... 
>> <mailto:etm@...>> wrote:
>>
>>     Marcio,
>>
>>     The logic in the build manager works like this (in psuedo code):
>>
>>     checkoutProject();
>>
>>     revisionList = getRevisions();
>>
>>     if (revisionList.isEmpty()) {
>>        log( "Build Not required")
>>     }
>>
>>     if (build.isForced() OR revisionList.isNotEmpty()) {
>>        build();
>>     }
>>     else {
>>        log("Build Not Required);
>>     }
>>
>>     So if you are seeing two "Build Not Required" messages, it is 
>> because
>>     there are no revisions and the build was not flagged as being 
>> forced.
>>     Currently, the schedules do not support always forcing builds
>>     which may
>>     be the source of your problem. Scheduled builds are always 
>> managed by
>>     the presence of revisions. Ad hoc builds may be forced though.
>>
>>     -- Eric
>>
>>     I found the double Build Not Required messages a bit confusing 
>> and not
>>     terribly useful. I've gone ahead and changed the first to simply
>>     be, "No
>>     revisions detected".
>>
>>
>>
>>     Marcio Ribeiro wrote:
>>
>>     > Hi,
>>     > my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option,
>>     when the
>>     > build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout
>>     appear two
>>     > messages:
>>     >
>>     > is project up to date?
>>     > Build Not required
>>     > Build Not required
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > What's happening???
>>     >
>>     
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>
>>     >
>>     >_______________________________________________
>>     >Anthill mailing list
>>     >Anthill@... <mailto:Anthill@...>
>>     >http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>     <http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Anthill mailing list
>>     Anthill@... <mailto:Anthill@...>
>>     http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anthill mailing list
>> Anthill@...
>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill mailing list
> Anthill@...
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Robert E Dobbins | 3 Jun 01:22
Picon
Favicon

Robert E Dobbins/Alpharetta/IBM is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 06/02/2006 and will not return until 06/12/2006.

If you need assistance please contact Chris Holden, Kathy Amundson. I will respond to your message(s) when I return.

If it is an urgent matter call my cell.

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill@...
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Res Pons | 4 Jun 19:42
Picon

Re: [Bulk] Re: Build Not required

For this very reason and also the fact that someone decided for the rest of 
us if there's no rev changes, a build therefore is not necessary regardless 
whether we would still want it or not in Anthill OS....I check in a dummy 
build.number file into my projects every night, so AH is forced to do 
automated builds.

----Original Message Follows----
From: gnugy <gnugy@...>
Reply-To: Anthill user list <anthill@...>
To: Anthill user list <anthill@...>
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Anthill] Build Not required
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:48:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([64.34.169.154]) by 
bay0-mc6-f17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 2 
Jun 2006 14:48:57 -0700
Received: (qmail 30071 invoked by uid 510); 2 Jun 2006 21:48:59 -0000
Received: from anthill-bounces@... by
caladin.urbancode.com 
by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20  (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.  Processed in 0.021285 secs); 02 Jun 2006 21:48:59 
-0000
Received: from localhost (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1)  by 
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2006 21:48:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 30045 invoked by uid 510); 2 Jun 2006 21:48:58 -0000
Received: from gnugy@... by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 
withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:0(206.190.36.81):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.617921 secs); 02 
Jun 2006 21:48:58 -0000
Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (206.190.36.81)by 
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2006 21:48:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 26972 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2006 21:48:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 
?192.168.1.100?)(pgraham41@...@70.29.203.81 with
plain)by 
smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2006 21:48:52 -0000
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt1Enu+rK2N7WAXLUxcqz2vzQ4wvj44mGtM=
Return-Path: <gnugy@...>
Delivered-To: mailman-anthill@...
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; 
d=rogers.com;h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;b=4XxzlSxEie5L4dOaHRoabsr8RHRmwQekF5aAHpiWegGi4OavGFYp877QHMC1lp8g5YN6bhjLlqjU84T/DWU0WIkUg1HXWvCDUTyvNzoDc72he74MTaDi+BL4tinNQ1HpzFI+Gw1zOE8K0hI6LRbqnat5Ku67Kf0GyYp+GaQf5hM=;
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
References: 
<2791ac1b0606021013r717c7973i829769b73e0a09f2@...>	<44807AAD.3030000@...><2791ac1b0606021154o4efed9cahe59784dc461ae4c8@...>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
caladin.urbancode.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.61
X-BeenThere: anthill@...
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anthill user list <anthill.lists.urbancode.com>
List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request@...?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill>
List-Post: <mailto:anthill@...>
List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request@...?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request@...?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: anthill-bounces@...
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2006 21:48:57.0414 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[59A59660:01C6868E]

Are you by any chance using the SubversionRepositoryAdapter?  If you are I 
had the same problem a few months back that boiled down to a problem with
a regular expression in the getRevisionsSince() method.  If this is the case 
post back here and I'll dig up the expression that should fix things.

-- Philip.

Marcio Ribeiro wrote:

>but now I've added blank lines on a java source file and commited, changing 
>the revision...   the scheduled build still doesnt work.
>
>On 6/2/06, *Eric Minick * <etm@...
<mailto:etm@...>> 
>wrote:
>
>     Marcio,
>
>     The logic in the build manager works like this (in psuedo code):
>
>     checkoutProject();
>
>     revisionList = getRevisions();
>
>     if (revisionList.isEmpty()) {
>        log( "Build Not required")
>     }
>
>     if (build.isForced() OR revisionList.isNotEmpty()) {
>        build();
>     }
>     else {
>        log("Build Not Required);
>     }
>
>     So if you are seeing two "Build Not Required" messages, it is because
>     there are no revisions and the build was not flagged as being forced.
>     Currently, the schedules do not support always forcing builds
>     which may
>     be the source of your problem. Scheduled builds are always managed by
>     the presence of revisions. Ad hoc builds may be forced though.
>
>     -- Eric
>
>     I found the double Build Not Required messages a bit confusing and not
>     terribly useful. I've gone ahead and changed the first to simply
>     be, "No
>     revisions detected".
>
>
>
>     Marcio Ribeiro wrote:
>
>     > Hi,
>     > my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option,
>     when the
>     > build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout
>     appear two
>     > messages:
>     >
>     > is project up to date?
>     > Build Not required
>     > Build Not required
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > What's happening???
>     >
>     
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >Anthill mailing list
>     >Anthill@... <mailto:Anthill@...>
>     >http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>     <http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>
>     >
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Anthill mailing list
>     Anthill@... <mailto:Anthill@...>
>     http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill@...
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill@...
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to 
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Robert E Dobbins | 5 Jun 00:05
Picon
Favicon

Robert E Dobbins/Alpharetta/IBM is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 06/02/2006 and will not return until 06/12/2006.

If you need assistance please contact Chris Holden, Kathy Amundson. I will respond to your message(s) when I return.

If it is an urgent matter call my cell.

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill@...
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Marcio Marchini | 5 Jun 17:33

Re: Re:Project being built - forever !?


	Sorry for the long delay.

	If I try to run the cvs log command manually from "DOS", it works just 
fine, no freezes.

	Why does it hang when run from Anthill 1.8.1? Thanks,

marcio

Varban wrote:
> Hi Marcio,
> 
> I have seen this happen before and the problem was somewhere on the cvs server 
> because if I ran the command manually in a console, the cvs process never 
> returned, it was just sitting there and waiting for something. Can you run 
> the 
> cvs -d :ext:marcio@...:/home/cvs log -d">2005-12-05
16:46:31 
> GMT"  -rHEAD -N
> 
> command manually and see if the same thing happens?
> 
> Varban
> On Friday 19 May 2006 18:40, Marcio Marchini wrote:
>> 	I tried it again with Anthill version 1.8.1.303 and Tomcat not as a
>> service, and in the console I see this:
>>
>>
>> 18:25:24:640 [Thread - AnthillBuildDaemon] INFO
>> com.urbancode.anthill.BuildMana
>> ger  - Step 7) Publish Project:
>> 18:25:26:000 [Thread - AnthillBuildDaemon] INFO
>> com.urbancode.anthill.adapter.C
>> VSRepositoryAdapter  - Get revisions since command: cmd /x/c
>>          cd /d
>> C:\java\anthill-1.8.1.303\HelloWorldWorkDir\agile\CTIP\com.bedarra
>> .continuousbuild.example &&
>> cvs -d :ext:marcio@...:/home/cvs log -d">2005-12-05
>> 16:46:31 GMT" -
>> rHEAD -N
>>
>> cvs server: Logging .
>> cvs server: Logging context
>> cvs server: Logging context/WEB-INF
>> cvs server: Logging src
>> cvs server: Logging src/com
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild/example
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild/example/tests
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild/example/tests/cactus
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild/example/tests/fitnesse
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild/example/tests/httpunit
>> cvs server: Logging
>> src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild/example/tests/httpunit/cactu
>> s
>> cvs server: Logging src/com/bedarra/continuousbuild/example/tests/junit
>> cvs server: Logging src/jsp
>> cvs server: Logging web
>> cvs server: Logging web/WEB-INF
>> cvs server: Logging wiki
>> cvs server: Logging xsl
>>
>>
>>
>> 	And nothing else. It stays that way. My cvs.exe is this one:
>>
>> C:\Documents and Settings\marcio>cvs -v
>>
>> Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.2 (client)
>>
>> Copyright (c) 1989-2001 Brian Berliner, david d `zoo' zuhn,
>>                          Jeff Polk, and other authors
>>
>> CVS may be copied only under the terms of the GNU General Public License,
>> a copy of which can be found with the CVS distribution kit.
>>
>> Specify the --help option for further information about CVS
>>
>>
>> 	Any ideas? It seems to be frozen in cvs.exe ??
>>
>>
>> marcio
>>
>> Marcio Marchini wrote:
>>>     Ok, the problem has come back to me. I am still running Anthill
>>> version 1.8.0.264
>>>
>>> - I do have the patched ant.bat as per this message:
>>>
>>> “this is a problem with the ant.bat file that comes with the Ant
>>> distributions. The batch script does not return the real exit code from
>>> the java process, instead it returns 0 which confuses Anthill as to the
>>> real outcome of the build. If you switch the ant.bat file in the ant
>>> distribution you are using with this one:
>>> http://www.urbancode.com/download/ant.bat
>>> Anthill will be able to detect the failures.”
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -I do have a patched CommonsExecute.jar as per this message (even though
>>> I run XP)
>>>
>>> If you are running Tomcat 5.5 under Win2003, the problem is with an
>>> outdated Anthill jar. The bug fixes will be released with Anthill 1.8.1.
>>> As a workaround for now, you can use the patched jar available here:
>>> http://www.urbancode.com/download/anthill_os/CommonsExecute.jar . It
>>> needs to go into Anthill’s lib folder and also into the
>>> anthill/WEB-INF/lib folder Tomcat explodes out from the war file
>>> (CATALINA_HOME/webapps/anthill/WEB-INF/lib).
>>>
>>>
>>> - I am running cvs and another project from the same repo builds fine
>>>
>>> - I looked at the Tomcat logs and I see nothing strange.
>>>
>>>
>>>     I run Tomcat as a service. Even running it from a BAT I see nothing
>>> strange. I see "HelloWorld -- Being built" forever in the browser.
>>>
>>>
>>>     What else can I try? Too dangerous to upgrade Anthill at this point,
>>> so let me know how to make it work with 1.8.0.264 under Java 1.5.0_05.
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> marcio
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Anthill mailing list
>>> Anthill@...
>>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anthill mailing list
>> Anthill@...
>> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Marcio Ribeiro | 5 Jun 18:08
Picon

Re: [Bulk] Re: Build Not required

Yes Philip, I'm using SubversionRepositoryAdapter.

On 6/4/06, Res Pons <pons32-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
For this very reason and also the fact that someone decided for the rest of
us if there's no rev changes, a build therefore is not necessary regardless
whether we would still want it or not in Anthill OS....I check in a dummy
build.number file into my projects every night, so AH is forced to do
automated builds.

----Original Message Follows----
From: gnugy <gnugy-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Reply-To: Anthill user list < anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
To: Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Anthill] Build Not required
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:48:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([64.34.169.154]) by
bay0-mc6-f17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 2
Jun 2006 14:48:57 -0700
Received: (qmail 30071 invoked by uid 510); 2 Jun 2006 21:48:59 -0000
Received: from anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org by caladin.urbancode.com
by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20  (spamassassin: 2.61.
Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1 ):.  Processed in 0.021285 secs); 02 Jun 2006 21:48:59
-0000
Received: from localhost (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1)  by
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2006 21:48:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 30045 invoked by uid 510); 2 Jun 2006 21:48:58 -0000
Received: from gnugy-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504
withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61.
Clear:RC:0(206.190.36.81):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.617921 secs); 02
Jun 2006 21:48:58 -0000
Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (206.190.36.81)by
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2006 21:48:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 26972 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2006 21:48:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO
?192.168.1.100?)(pgraham41-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org <at> 70.29.203.81 with plain)by
smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2006 21:48:52 -0000
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt1Enu+rK2N7WAXLUxcqz2vzQ4wvj44mGtM=
Return-Path: <gnugy-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Delivered-To: mailman-anthill-QRS84+L55VVJU0hlZIk5wmXnswh1EIUO@public.gmane.org
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024;
d=rogers.com;h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;b=4XxzlSxEie5L4dOaHRoabsr8RHRmwQekF5aAHpiWegGi4OavGFYp877QHMC1lp8g5YN6bhjLlqjU84T/DWU0WIkUg1HXWvCDUTyvNzoDc72he74MTaDi+BL4tinNQ1HpzFI+Gw1zOE8K0hI6LRbqnat5Ku67Kf0GyYp+GaQf5hM=;
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
References:
<2791ac1b0606021013r717c7973i829769b73e0a09f2-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org >   <44807AAD.3030000-SVNIZWSJOcJl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org><2791ac1b0606021154o4efed9cahe59784dc461ae4c8-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org >
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
caladin.urbancode.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.61
X-BeenThere: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anthill user list < anthill.lists.urbancode.com>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto: anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill>
List-Post: <mailto: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
< http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2006 21:48:57.0414 (UTC)
FILETIME=[59A59660:01C6868E]

Are you by any chance using the SubversionRepositoryAdapter?  If you are I
had the same problem a few months back that boiled down to a problem with
a regular expression in the getRevisionsSince() method.  If this is the case
post back here and I'll dig up the expression that should fix things.

-- Philip.

Marcio Ribeiro wrote:

>but now I've added blank lines on a java source file and commited, changing
>the revision...   the scheduled build still doesnt work.
>
>On 6/2/06, *Eric Minick * <etm-SVNIZWSJOcJl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org <mailto:etm-SVNIZWSJOcJl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org >>
>wrote:
>
>     Marcio,
>
>     The logic in the build manager works like this (in psuedo code):
>
>     checkoutProject();
>
>     revisionList = getRevisions();
>
>     if (revisionList.isEmpty()) {
>        log( "Build Not required")
>     }
>
>     if (build.isForced() OR revisionList.isNotEmpty()) {
>        build();
>     }
>     else {
>        log("Build Not Required);
>     }
>
>     So if you are seeing two "Build Not Required" messages, it is because
>     there are no revisions and the build was not flagged as being forced.
>     Currently, the schedules do not support always forcing builds
>     which may
>     be the source of your problem. Scheduled builds are always managed by
>     the presence of revisions. Ad hoc builds may be forced though.
>
>     -- Eric
>
>     I found the double Build Not Required messages a bit confusing and not
>     terribly useful. I've gone ahead and changed the first to simply
>     be, "No
>     revisions detected".
>
>
>
>     Marcio Ribeiro wrote:
>
>     > Hi,
>     > my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option,
>     when the
>     > build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout
>     appear two
>     > messages:
>     >
>     > is project up to date?
>     > Build Not required
>     > Build Not required
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > What's happening???
>     >
>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >Anthill mailing list
>     >Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org <mailto: Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
>     >http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>     < http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>
>     >
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Anthill mailing list
>     Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org <mailto:Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
>     http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/P3rXihlmxnZCEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill@...
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane